Department of Educational, School, and Counseling Psychology.
Department of Psychology.
Sch Psychol. 2019 Mar;34(2):187-200. doi: 10.1037/spq0000281. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
Implementation science provides guidance on existing evidence based practices (EBPs) by incorporating implementation concerns from the start. Focus-group methodology was used to understand barriers and facilitators of transition planning and implementation for students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) who often experience disparate postsecondary outcomes compared to peers. Results were used to modify an evidence-based consultation intervention originally applied to young students with ASD, called the Collaborative Model for Promoting Competence and Success (COMPASS; Ruble, Dalrymple, & McGrew, 2012). Because consultation is a multilevel EBP, two existing implementation science frameworks were used to guide adaptation: the Framework for Evidence Based Implementation and Intervention Practices (Dunst & Trivette, 2012) and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (Damschroder et al., 2009). The purpose of this article is to describe a process of adaptation of COMPASS that may be useful for other implementation science studies of consultation interventions, teacher acceptability, feasibility, and burden, and parent/student satisfaction with the adapted intervention. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
实施科学通过从一开始就纳入实施关注点,为现有的基于证据的实践(EBPs)提供指导。采用焦点小组方法来了解自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)学生过渡规划和实施的障碍和促进因素,这些学生与同龄人相比,往往在高等教育后结果存在显著差异。研究结果用于修改最初应用于患有 ASD 的年轻学生的循证咨询干预措施,称为促进能力和成功的协作模型(COMPASS;Ruble、Dalrymple 和 McGrew,2012)。由于咨询是一种多层次的 EBP,因此使用了两个现有的实施科学框架来指导适应性调整:基于证据的实施和干预实践框架(Dunst 和 Trivette,2012)和实施研究综合框架(Damschroder 等人,2009)。本文的目的是描述 COMPASS 适应性调整的过程,这对于其他咨询干预措施、教师可接受性、可行性和负担、以及对改编干预措施的家长/学生满意度的实施科学研究可能是有用的。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。