Department of Special Education, San Diego State University.
Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego.
Am Psychol. 2020 Nov;75(8):1105-1115. doi: 10.1037/amp0000649.
Understanding the factors that influence the use of evidence-based practices (EBPs) for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in schools is critical to the selection of effective implementation strategies to support their sustained use. The current study has 2 aims: (a) evaluate the association between school leadership profiles (undifferentiated and optimal) and fidelity of EBP implementation and (b) examine the role of implementation climate as a mediator in this association. Participants included 56 principals, 90 special education teachers, and 133 classroom staff from 66 elementary schools. Participants completed the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire and Implementation Climate Scale. Teachers and staff reported on intensity (frequency) of EBP delivery, and the research team rated the accuracy (adherence) to the components of the EBP. Schools were required to implement at least 1 of 3 EBPs for ASD (discrete trial training, pivotal response training, or visual supports). Using structural equation modeling, we found that schools with optimal leadership had higher observed ratings of teacher and staff fidelity for pivotal response training accuracy (p < .05), but not for discrete trial training or visual supports. However, this association became nonsignificant with the introduction of implementation climate into the models. Optimal leadership profiles were linked to more positive teacher/staff-reported implementation climate, compared with undifferentiated profiles (p < .01), but found no association between implementation climate and fidelity. Overall, the results of this study indicate that the role of principal leadership in EBP implementation is complex, which has implications for fostering a conducive organizational implementation context in schools. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
了解影响学校自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)中使用循证实践(EBP)的因素对于选择有效的实施策略以支持其持续使用至关重要。本研究有两个目的:(a)评估学校领导概况(无差别和最佳)与 EBP 实施保真度之间的关联,以及(b)检验实施氛围在这种关联中的中介作用。参与者包括 66 所小学的 56 名校长、90 名特殊教育教师和 133 名课堂工作人员。参与者完成了多因素领导力问卷和实施氛围量表。教师和工作人员报告了 EBP 实施的强度(频率),研究小组则对 EBP 组成部分的准确性(遵从性)进行了评分。学校必须实施至少 3 种 ASD 的 EBP 之一(离散试训、关键反应训练或视觉支持)。通过结构方程模型,我们发现具有最佳领导力的学校在关键反应训练准确性方面具有更高的教师和工作人员遵从性观察评分(p <.05),但在离散试训或视觉支持方面则不然。然而,随着实施氛围被纳入模型,这种关联变得不再显著。与无差别概况相比,最佳领导概况与更积极的教师/工作人员报告的实施氛围相关(p <.01),但在实施氛围与保真度之间未发现关联。总的来说,这项研究的结果表明,校长领导力在 EBP 实施中的作用是复杂的,这对在学校营造有利的组织实施环境具有影响。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。