Charles Sturt University.
Am Psychol. 2018 Oct;73(7):930-931. doi: 10.1037/amp0000342.
This comment attempts to correct misconceptions about psychometric measurement in the American Psychologist article "Journal Article Reporting Standards for Quantitative Research in Psychology" (Appelbaum et al., 2018) by offering an outline of what the author calls the new psychometrics. The new psychometrics argues for replacing "construct validation" with construct-to-measure validation, abandoning "convergent validation" in favor of content validation requiring correspondence of the content of the measure with the content of the construct definition, and restricting the term reliability to mean only the precision of scores from the measure. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).
这篇评论试图纠正《美国心理学家》杂志上的一篇文章“心理学定量研究的期刊文章报告标准”（Appelbaum 等人，2018 年）中关于心理测量学的误解，提出了作者所谓的新心理测量学的大纲。新心理测量学主张用构念到测量的验证来取代“构念验证”，放弃“会聚验证”，转而支持内容验证，要求测量的内容与构念定义的内容相对应，并将可靠性一词的含义仅限于测量结果的精度。（PsycINFO 数据库记录（c）2018 APA，保留所有权利）。
