GIGA Cardiovascular Sciences, Department of Cardiology, Heart Valve Clinic, University of Liège Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire du Sart Tilman, Liège, Belgium.
Gruppo Villa Maria Care and Research, Anthea Hospital, Bari, Italy.
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Nov 1;3(11):1060-1068. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.3152.
The natural history and the management of patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) have not been fully examined in the current era.
To determine the clinical outcomes of patients with asymptomatic AS using data from the Heart Valve Clinic International Database.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This registry was assembled by merging data from prospectively gathered institutional databases from 10 heart valve clinics in Europe, Canada, and the United States. Asymptomatic patients with an aortic valve area of 1.5 cm2 or less and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) greater than 50% at entry were considered for the present analysis. Data were collected from January 2001 to December 2014, and data were analyzed from January 2017 to July 2018.
Natural history, need for aortic valve replacement (AVR), and survival of asymptomatic patients with moderate or severe AS at entry followed up in a heart valve clinic. Indications for AVR were based on current guideline recommendations.
Of the 1375 patients included in this analysis, 834 (60.7%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 71 (13) years. A total of 861 patients (62.6%) had severe AS (aortic valve area less than 1.0 cm2). The mean (SD) overall survival during medical management (mean [SD] follow up, 27 [24] months) was 93% (1%), 86% (2%), and 75% (4%) at 2, 4, and 8 years, respectively. A total of 104 patients (7.6%) died under observation, including 57 patients (54.8%) from cardiovascular causes. The crude rate of sudden death was 0.65% over the duration of the study. A total of 542 patients (39.4%) underwent AVR, including 388 patients (71.6%) with severe AS at study entry and 154 (28.4%) with moderate AS at entry who progressed to severe AS. Those with severe AS at entry who underwent AVR did so at a mean (SD) of 14.4 (16.6) months and a median of 8.7 months. The mean (SD) 2-year and 4-year AVR-free survival rates for asymptomatic patients with severe AS at baseline were 54% (2%) and 32% (3%), respectively. In those undergoing AVR, the 30-day postprocedural mortality was 0.9%. In patients with severe AS at entry, peak aortic jet velocity (greater than 5 m/s) and LVEF (less than 60%) were associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality without AVR; these factors were also associated with postprocedural mortality in those patients with severe AS at baseline who underwent AVR (surgical AVR in 310 patients; transcatheter AVR in 78 patients).
In patients with asymptomatic AS followed up in heart valve centers, the risk of sudden death is low, and rates of overall survival are similar to those reported from previous series. Patients with severe AS at baseline and peak aortic jet velocity of 5.0 m/s or greater or LVEF less than 60% have increased risks of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality even after AVR. The potential benefit of early intervention should be considered in these high-risk patients.
在当前时代,尚未充分研究无症状主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者的自然病史和治疗方法。
使用来自国际心脏瓣膜诊所数据库的数据,确定无症状 AS 患者的临床结局。
设计、地点和参与者:本注册研究通过合并来自欧洲、加拿大和美国的 10 家心脏瓣膜诊所前瞻性收集的机构数据库中的数据而组建。符合本次分析条件的是在入组时主动脉瓣口面积为 1.5cm2 或以下且左心室射血分数(LVEF)大于 50%的无症状患者。数据收集时间为 2001 年 1 月至 2014 年 12 月,数据分析时间为 2017 年 1 月至 2018 年 7 月。
在心脏瓣膜诊所随访的、入组时患有中度或重度 AS 的无症状患者的自然病史、主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)的需求以及生存情况。AVR 的适应证基于当前指南建议。
本分析纳入的 1375 例患者中,834 例(60.7%)为男性,平均(SD)年龄为 71(13)岁。861 例(62.6%)患者患有严重 AS(主动脉瓣口面积小于 1.0cm2)。在接受药物治疗的情况下,总生存(平均[SD]随访时间为 27[24]个月)的总体 2 年、4 年和 8 年生存率分别为 93%(1%)、86%(2%)和 75%(4%)。共有 104 例患者(7.6%)在观察期间死亡,其中 57 例(54.8%)死于心血管原因。研究期间总死亡率为 0.65%。共有 542 例患者(39.4%)接受了 AVR,其中 388 例(71.6%)患者在入组时患有严重 AS,154 例(28.4%)患者在入组时患有中度 AS,且进展为严重 AS。在入组时患有严重 AS 且接受 AVR 的患者中,AVR 的平均(SD)时间为 14.4(16.6)个月,中位数为 8.7 个月。在基线时患有严重 AS 的无症状患者中,2 年和 4 年的 AVR 无事件生存率分别为 54%(2%)和 32%(3%)。在接受 AVR 的患者中,30 天的术后死亡率为 0.9%。在入组时患有严重 AS 的患者中,峰值主动脉射流速度(大于 5m/s)和 LVEF(小于 60%)与全因和心血管死亡率相关,即使在接受 AVR 的基线时患有严重 AS 的患者中,这些因素也与术后死亡率相关(310 例患者行外科 AVR,78 例患者行经导管 AVR)。
在接受心脏瓣膜中心随访的无症状 AS 患者中,猝死风险较低,总生存率与以往研究报道的相似。基线时患有严重 AS 且峰值主动脉射流速度为 5.0m/s 或更高或 LVEF 小于 60%的患者,即使在接受 AVR 后,全因和心血管死亡率的风险也会增加。应考虑对这些高危患者进行早期干预。