Heart Lung Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
GIGA Cardiovascular Sciences, Department of Cardiology, Heart Valve Clinic, University of Liège Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sart Tilman, Liège, Belgium.
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Sep 1;3(9):839-847. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.2288.
The optimal timing to operate in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) remains controversial. Left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV GLS) may help to identify patients who might benefit from undergoing earlier aortic valve replacement.
To investigate the prevalence of impaired LV GLS, the natural course of LV GLS, and its prognostic implications in patients with asymptomatic severe AS with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This registry-based study included the institutional registries of 3 large tertiary referral centers and 220 patients with asymptomatic severe AS and preserved LVEF (>50%) who were matched for age and sex with 220 controls without structural heart disease. The echocardiograms of patients and controls were performed between 1998 and 2017.
Both clinical and echocardiographic data were assessed retrospectively. Severe AS was defined by an indexed aortic valve area less than 0.6 cm2/m2. Left ventricular global longitudinal strain was evaluated on transthoracic echocardiography using speckle tracking imaging.
The prevalence of impaired LV GLS, the natural course of LV GLS, and the association of impaired LV GLS with symptom onset and the need for aortic valve intervention.
Two hundred twenty patients (mean [SD] age, 68 [13] years; 126 men [57%]) were included. Despite comparable LVEF, LV GLS was significantly impaired in patients with asymptomatic severe AS compared with age- and sex-matched controls without AS (mean [SD] LV GLS, -17.9% [2.5%] vs -19.6% [2.1%]; P < .001). After a median follow-up of 12 (interquartile range, 7-23) months, mean (SD) LV GLS significantly deteriorated (-18.0% [2.6%] to -16.3% [2.8%]; P < .001) while LVEF remained unchanged. Patients with impaired LV GLS at baseline (>-18.2%) showed a higher risk for developing symptoms (P = .02) and needing aortic valve intervention (P = .03) at follow-up compared with patients with more preserved LV GLS (≤-18.2%).
Subclinical myocardial dysfunction that is characterized by impaired LV GLS is often present in patients with asymptomatic severe AS with preserved LVEF. Left ventricular global longitudinal strain further deteriorates over time and impaired LV GLS at baseline is associated with an increased risk for progression to the symptomatic stage and the need for aortic valve intervention.
对于无症状严重主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者,最佳手术时机仍存在争议。左心室整体纵向应变(LV GLS)可能有助于确定可能受益于早期主动脉瓣置换的患者。
研究无症状严重 AS 合并左心室射血分数(LVEF)保留患者中 LV GLS 受损的患病率、LV GLS 的自然病程及其预后意义。
设计、地点和参与者:本基于注册的研究包括 3 家大型三级转诊中心的机构注册中心和 220 名无症状严重 AS 合并 LVEF(>50%)的患者,这些患者与 220 名无结构性心脏病的对照者按年龄和性别匹配。患者和对照者的超声心动图检查于 1998 年至 2017 年之间进行。
回顾性评估临床和超声心动图数据。严重 AS 定义为指数化主动脉瓣面积小于 0.6 cm2/m2。使用斑点追踪成像技术在经胸超声心动图上评估左心室整体纵向应变。
LV GLS 受损的患病率、LV GLS 的自然病程以及 LV GLS 受损与症状发作和主动脉瓣干预的相关性。
共纳入 220 名患者(平均[标准差]年龄,68[13]岁;男性 126 名[57%])。尽管 LVEF 相当,但与无 AS 的年龄和性别匹配的对照组相比,无症状严重 AS 患者的 LV GLS 明显受损(平均[标准差]LV GLS,-17.9%[2.5%]与-19.6%[2.1%];P<0.001)。中位随访 12(四分位距,7-23)个月后,平均(标准差)LV GLS 显著恶化(-18.0%[2.6%]至-16.3%[2.8%];P<0.001),而 LVEF 保持不变。与保留 LV GLS(≤-18.2%)的患者相比,基线时存在 LV GLS 受损(>-18.2%)的患者发生症状(P=0.02)和需要主动脉瓣干预(P=0.03)的风险更高。
无症状严重 AS 合并 LVEF 保留患者常存在亚临床心肌功能障碍,表现为 LV GLS 受损。左心室整体纵向应变随时间进一步恶化,基线时的 LV GLS 受损与进展至症状期和需要主动脉瓣干预的风险增加相关。