Suppr超能文献

加拿大儿童久坐行为与身体素养的关系:来自 RBC-CAPL Learn to Play 研究的横断面分析。

The relationship between sedentary behaviour and physical literacy in Canadian children: a cross-sectional analysis from the RBC-CAPL Learn to Play study.

机构信息

Department of Applied Human Sciences, University of Prince Edward Island, 550 University Avenue, Charlottetown, PE, C1A 4P3, Canada.

Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB, T1K 3M4, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2018 Oct 2;18(Suppl 2):1037. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5892-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Physical literacy is the foundation of a physically active lifestyle. Sedentary behaviour displays deleterious associations with important health indicators in children. However, the association between sedentary behaviour and physical literacy is unknown. The purpose of this study was to identify the aspects of physical literacy that are associated with key modes of sedentary behaviour among Canadian children participating in the RBC-CAPL Learn to Play study.

METHODS

A total of 8,307 children aged 8.0-12.9 years were included in the present analysis. Physical literacy was assessed using the Canadian Assessment of Physical Literacy, which measures four domains (Physical Competence, Daily Behaviour, Motivation and Confidence, Knowledge and Understanding). Screen-based sedentary behaviours (TV viewing, computer and video game use), non-screen sedentary behaviours (reading, doing homework, sitting and talking to friends, drawing, etc.) and total sedentary behaviour were assessed via self-report questionnaire. Linear regression models were used to determine significant (p<0.05) correlates of each mode of sedentary behaviour.

RESULTS

In comparison to girls, boys reported more screen time (2.7±2.0 vs 2.2±1.8 hours/day, Cohen's d=0.29), and total sedentary behaviour (4.3±2.6 vs 3.9±2.4 hours/day, Cohen's d=0.19), but lower non-screen-based sedentary behaviour (1.6±1.3 vs 1.7±1.3 hours/day, Cohen's d=0.08) (all p< 0.05). Physical Competence (standardized β's: -0.100 to -0.036, all p<0.05) and Motivation and Confidence (standardized β's: -0.274 to -0.083, all p<0.05) were negatively associated with all modes of sedentary behaviour in fully adjusted models. Knowledge and Understanding was negatively associated with screen-based modes of sedentary behaviour (standardized β's: -0.039 to -0.032, all p<0.05), and positively associated with non-screen sedentary behaviour (standardized β: 0.098, p<0.05). Progressive Aerobic Cardiovascular Endurance Run score and log-transformed plank score were negatively associated with all screen-based modes of sedentary behaviour, while the Canadian Agility and Movement Skill Assessment score was negatively associated with all modes of sedentary behaviour other than TV viewing (all p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

These results highlight differences in the ways that screen and non-screen sedentary behaviours relate to physical literacy. Public health interventions should continue to target screen-based sedentary behaviours, given their potentially harmful associations with important aspects of physical literacy.

摘要

背景

身体素养是积极生活方式的基础。久坐行为与儿童的重要健康指标呈有害关联。然而,久坐行为与身体素养之间的关系尚不清楚。本研究的目的是确定加拿大 RBC-CAPL Learn to Play 研究中参与的儿童的身体素养与主要久坐行为模式相关的方面。

方法

共有 8307 名 8.0-12.9 岁的儿童参与了本分析。身体素养使用加拿大身体素养评估进行评估,该评估测量四个领域(身体能力、日常行为、动机和信心、知识和理解)。通过自我报告问卷评估屏幕为基础的久坐行为(看电视、使用电脑和视频游戏)、非屏幕为基础的久坐行为(阅读、做作业、坐着与朋友交谈、画画等)和总久坐行为。使用线性回归模型确定每种久坐行为模式的显著(p<0.05)相关因素。

结果

与女孩相比,男孩报告的屏幕时间更多(2.7±2.0 与 2.2±1.8 小时/天,Cohen's d=0.29),总久坐行为时间更多(4.3±2.6 与 3.9±2.4 小时/天,Cohen's d=0.19),但非屏幕为基础的久坐行为时间更少(1.6±1.3 与 1.7±1.3 小时/天,Cohen's d=0.08)(均 p<0.05)。在完全调整的模型中,身体能力(标准化β:-0.100 至-0.036,均 p<0.05)和动机和信心(标准化β:-0.274 至-0.083,均 p<0.05)与所有模式的久坐行为呈负相关。知识和理解与屏幕为基础的久坐行为模式呈负相关(标准化β:-0.039 至-0.032,均 p<0.05),与非屏幕为基础的久坐行为模式呈正相关(标准化β:0.098,p<0.05)。渐进式有氧心血管耐力跑得分和记录式平板支撑得分与所有屏幕为基础的久坐行为模式呈负相关,而加拿大敏捷和运动技能评估得分与除电视观看以外的所有久坐行为模式呈负相关(均 p<0.05)。

结论

这些结果突出了屏幕和非屏幕久坐行为与身体素养相关的方式的差异。鉴于屏幕为基础的久坐行为与身体素养的重要方面呈潜在有害关联,公共卫生干预措施应继续针对该行为。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1aaa/6167761/0ab47ed29b7d/12889_2018_5892_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验