Suppr超能文献

久坐行为研究网络(SBRN)——术语共识项目的过程与成果。

Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) - Terminology Consensus Project process and outcome.

作者信息

Tremblay Mark S, Aubert Salomé, Barnes Joel D, Saunders Travis J, Carson Valerie, Latimer-Cheung Amy E, Chastin Sebastien F M, Altenburg Teatske M, Chinapaw Mai J M

机构信息

Healthy Active Living and Obesity Research Group, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, 401 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L1, Canada.

Department of Applied Human Sciences, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PEI, C1A 4P3, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Jun 10;14(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0525-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The prominence of sedentary behavior research in health science has grown rapidly. With this growth there is increasing urgency for clear, common and accepted terminology and definitions. Such standardization is difficult to achieve, especially across multi-disciplinary researchers, practitioners, and industries. The Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) undertook a Terminology Consensus Project to address this need.

METHOD

First, a literature review was completed to identify key terms in sedentary behavior research. These key terms were then reviewed and modified by a Steering Committee formed by SBRN. Next, SBRN members were invited to contribute to this project and interested participants reviewed and provided feedback on the proposed list of terms and draft definitions through an online survey. Finally, a conceptual model and consensus definitions (including caveats and examples for all age groups and functional abilities) were finalized based on the feedback received from the 87 SBRN member participants who responded to the original invitation and survey.

RESULTS

Consensus definitions for the terms physical inactivity, stationary behavior, sedentary behavior, standing, screen time, non-screen-based sedentary time, sitting, reclining, lying, sedentary behavior pattern, as well as how the terms bouts, breaks, and interruptions should be used in this context are provided.

CONCLUSION

It is hoped that the definitions resulting from this comprehensive, transparent, and broad-based participatory process will result in standardized terminology that is widely supported and adopted, thereby advancing future research, interventions, policies, and practices related to sedentary behaviors.

摘要

背景

久坐行为研究在健康科学领域的重要性迅速增长。随着这种增长,对于清晰、通用且被认可的术语和定义的需求日益迫切。这种标准化很难实现,尤其是在多学科研究人员、从业者和行业之间。久坐行为研究网络(SBRN)开展了一项术语共识项目来满足这一需求。

方法

首先,完成了一项文献综述以确定久坐行为研究中的关键术语。这些关键术语随后由SBRN组建的指导委员会进行审查和修改。接下来,邀请SBRN成员参与该项目,感兴趣的参与者通过在线调查对拟议的术语列表和定义草案进行审查并提供反馈。最后,根据对最初邀请和调查做出回应的87名SBRN成员参与者的反馈,确定了一个概念模型和共识定义(包括针对所有年龄组和功能能力的注意事项和示例)。

结果

提供了身体活动不足、静止行为、久坐行为、站立、屏幕时间、非基于屏幕的久坐时间、坐姿、斜倚、躺卧、久坐行为模式等术语的共识定义,以及在这种情况下应如何使用发作、休息和中断等术语。

结论

希望通过这个全面、透明且基础广泛的参与过程得出的定义将产生得到广泛支持和采用的标准化术语,从而推动未来与久坐行为相关的研究、干预措施、政策和实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e09/5466781/271be76c70a3/12966_2017_525_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验