1 Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA.
2 Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK.
Palliat Med. 2018 Feb;32(2):404-412. doi: 10.1177/0269216317727157. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
Phase of Illness describes stages of advanced illness according to care needs of the individual, family and suitability of care plan. There is limited evidence on its association with other measures of symptoms, and health-related needs, in palliative care.
The aims of the study are as follows. (1) Describe function, pain, other physical problems, psycho-spiritual problems and family and carer support needs by Phase of Illness. (2) Consider strength of associations between these measures and Phase of Illness.
Secondary analysis of patient-level data; a total of 1317 patients in three settings. Function measured using Australia-modified Karnofsky Performance Scale. Pain, other physical problems, psycho-spiritual problems and family and carer support needs measured using items on Palliative Care Problem Severity Scale.
Australia-modified Karnofsky Performance Scale and Palliative Care Problem Severity Scale items varied significantly by Phase of Illness. Mean function was highest in stable phase (65.9, 95% confidence interval = 63.4-68.3) and lowest in dying phase (16.6, 95% confidence interval = 15.3-17.8). Mean pain was highest in unstable phase (1.43, 95% confidence interval = 1.36-1.51). Multinomial regression: psycho-spiritual problems were not associated with Phase of Illness ( χ = 2.940, df = 3, p = 0.401). Family and carer support needs were greater in deteriorating phase than unstable phase (odds ratio (deteriorating vs unstable) = 1.23, 95% confidence interval = 1.01-1.49). Forty-nine percent of the variance in Phase of Illness is explained by Australia-modified Karnofsky Performance Scale and Palliative Care Problem Severity Scale.
Phase of Illness has value as a clinical measure of overall palliative need, capturing additional information beyond Australia-modified Karnofsky Performance Scale and Palliative Care Problem Severity Scale. Lack of significant association between psycho-spiritual problems and Phase of Illness warrants further investigation.
疾病阶段根据个体、家庭的护理需求和护理计划的适宜性来描述晚期疾病的阶段。在姑息治疗中,其与其他症状和健康相关需求的测量方法的关联证据有限。
本研究的目的如下。(1)按疾病阶段描述功能、疼痛、其他身体问题、心理-精神问题以及家庭和照顾者的支持需求。(2)考虑这些测量方法与疾病阶段之间的关联强度。
在三个地点共 1317 名患者的患者水平数据的二次分析。使用澳大利亚改良 Karnofsky 表现量表测量功能。使用姑息治疗问题严重程度量表上的项目测量疼痛、其他身体问题、心理-精神问题和家庭及照顾者的支持需求。
澳大利亚改良 Karnofsky 表现量表和姑息治疗问题严重程度量表项目在疾病阶段之间有显著差异。稳定阶段的平均功能最高(65.9,95%置信区间=63.4-68.3),临终阶段最低(16.6,95%置信区间=15.3-17.8)。不稳定阶段的平均疼痛最高(1.43,95%置信区间=1.36-1.51)。多项回归:心理-精神问题与疾病阶段无关( χ 2 =2.940,df=3,p=0.401)。恶化阶段的家庭和照顾者支持需求大于不稳定阶段(恶化与不稳定相比的比值比=1.23,95%置信区间=1.01-1.49)。疾病阶段的 49%的方差由澳大利亚改良 Karnofsky 表现量表和姑息治疗问题严重程度量表来解释。
疾病阶段作为一种整体姑息治疗需求的临床测量方法具有价值,它可以提供澳大利亚改良 Karnofsky 表现量表和姑息治疗问题严重程度量表之外的额外信息。心理-精神问题与疾病阶段之间缺乏显著关联值得进一步研究。