• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“护理安全感——患者评估”工具:其开发与展示

The instrument 'sense of security in care--patients' evaluation': its development and presentation.

作者信息

Krevers Barbro, Milberg Anna

机构信息

Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

出版信息

Psychooncology. 2014 Aug;23(8):914-20. doi: 10.1002/pon.3502. Epub 2014 Feb 14.

DOI:10.1002/pon.3502
PMID:24677414
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this paper is to report the development, construction, and psychometric properties of the new instrument Sense of Security in Care - Patients' Evaluation (SEC-P) in palliative home care.

METHODS

The preliminary instrument was based on a review of the literature and an analysis of qualitative interviews with patients about their sense of security. To test the instrument, 161 patients (58% women) in palliative home care were recruited and participated in a structured interview based on a comprehensive questionnaire (response rate 73%). We used principal component analysis to identify subscales and tested the construction in correlation with other scales and questions representing concepts that we expected to be related to sense of security in care.

RESULTS

The principal component analysis resulted in three subscales: Care Interaction, Identity, and Mastery, built on a total of 15 items. The component solution had an explained variance of 55%. Internal consistency of the subscales ranged from 0.84 to 0.69. Inter-scale correlations varied between 0.40 and 0.59. The scales were associated to varying degrees with the quality of the care process, perceived health, quality of life, stress, and general sense of security.

CONCLUSIONS

The developed SEC-P provides a three-component assessment of palliative home care settings using valid and reliable scales. The scales were associated with other concepts in ways that were expected. The SEC-P is a manageable means of assessment that can be used to improve quality of care and in research focusing on patients' sense of security in care.

摘要

目的

本文旨在报告姑息家庭护理中新型工具“护理安全感 - 患者评估量表(SEC - P)”的开发、构建及心理测量特性。

方法

初步量表基于文献综述以及对患者关于其安全感的定性访谈分析。为测试该量表,招募了161名姑息家庭护理患者(58%为女性),他们参与了基于综合问卷的结构化访谈(回复率73%)。我们使用主成分分析来确定子量表,并测试该量表结构与其他代表我们预期与护理安全感相关概念的量表和问题之间的相关性。

结果

主成分分析得出三个子量表:护理互动、身份认同和掌控感,共由15个项目构成。该成分分析的解释方差为55%。子量表的内部一致性范围为0.84至0.69。量表间的相关性在0.40至0.59之间。这些量表在不同程度上与护理过程质量、感知健康状况、生活质量、压力及总体安全感相关。

结论

所开发的SEC - P使用有效且可靠的量表对姑息家庭护理环境进行了三方面评估。这些量表与预期的其他概念相关。SEC - P是一种易于管理的评估手段,可用于改善护理质量以及专注于患者护理安全感的研究。

相似文献

1
The instrument 'sense of security in care--patients' evaluation': its development and presentation.“护理安全感——患者评估”工具:其开发与展示
Psychooncology. 2014 Aug;23(8):914-20. doi: 10.1002/pon.3502. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
2
The sense of security in care--Relatives' Evaluation instrument: its development and presentation.护理中的安全感——亲属评估工具:其开发与展示
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Mar;49(3):586-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.06.019. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
3
Patients' sense of security during palliative care-what are the influencing factors?姑息治疗期间患者的安全感——影响因素有哪些?
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Jul;48(1):45-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.08.021. Epub 2014 May 5.
4
A new Italian questionnaire to assess caregivers of cancer patients' satisfaction with palliative care: multicenter validation of the post mortem questionnaire-short form.一份用于评估癌症患者照护者对姑息治疗满意度的全新意大利问卷:验尸后问卷简表的多中心验证
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Feb;47(2):298-306. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.03.018. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
5
A scale for measuring feelings of support and security regarding cancer care in a region of Japan: a potential new endpoint of cancer care.用于衡量日本某地区癌症护理支持感和安全感的量表:癌症护理的潜在新终点。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012 Feb;43(2):218-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.005. Epub 2011 Sep 25.
6
Patients' sense of support within the family in the palliative care context: what are the influencing factors?姑息治疗背景下患者在家庭中的支持感:影响因素有哪些?
Psychooncology. 2014 Dec;23(12):1340-9. doi: 10.1002/pon.3564. Epub 2014 May 13.
7
Relationship between three palliative care outcome scales.三种姑息治疗结局量表之间的关系。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004 Nov 29;2:68. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-2-68.
8
Development and testing of the Oncology Patients' Perceptions of the Quality of Nursing Care Scale.肿瘤患者对护理质量感知量表的开发与测试
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2003 Mar-Apr;30(2):283-90. doi: 10.1188/03.ONF.283-290.
9
The meaning of quality of life: narrations by patients with incurable cancer in palliative home care.生活质量的意义:姑息性家庭护理中晚期癌症患者的叙述。
Palliat Support Care. 2008 Sep;6(3):231-8. doi: 10.1017/S1478951508000370.
10
Development and validation of a measurement tool to assess perceptions of palliative care.评估姑息治疗认知的测量工具的开发与验证。
Psychooncology. 2013 Apr;22(4):940-6. doi: 10.1002/pon.3071. Epub 2012 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Timely short-term specialised palliative home care for older people with frailty and their family: a mixed-methods pilot randomised controlled trial and process evaluation.为体弱老年人及其家庭提供及时的短期专科姑息居家护理:一项混合方法的试点随机对照试验及过程评估。
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 3;15(2):e077495. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077495.
2
Nonparticipation in a Digital Health Intervention Study Among Older Adults: Uneven Involvement, Biased Outcomes, and the Effect of Weighting.老年人未参与数字健康干预研究:参与不均衡、结果有偏差及加权的影响
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2024 Dec 11;80(1). doi: 10.1093/gerona/glae265.
3
'Development and psychometric evaluation of the safety feeling scale in adult patients at hospital: Exploratory sequential mixed method'.
《成人住院患者安全感量表的编制及心理测量学评价:探索性序贯混合方法》
Nurs Open. 2023 Sep;10(9):6165-6174. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1850. Epub 2023 May 28.
4
Safe acceptance in the nurses' cultural care of medical tourists in Iran: a qualitative study.伊朗护士对医疗游客文化关怀的安全接纳:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr 25;23(1):399. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09378-8.
5
Dying within dyads: Stress, sense of security and support during palliative home care.在二人组中死亡:姑息治疗家庭护理期间的压力、安全感和支持。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 14;16(9):e0257274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257274. eCollection 2021.
6
Timely short-term specialised palliative care service intervention for frail older people and their family carers in primary care: study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial.及时的短期专业姑息治疗服务干预对脆弱的老年人及其初级保健中的家庭照顾者:一项试点随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 20;11(1):e043663. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043663.
7
Factors associated with health-related quality of life and burden on relatives of older people with multi-morbidity: a dyadic data study.与多病老年人的健康相关生活质量及其亲属负担相关的因素:一项对偶数据研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Jun 26;20(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01604-w.
8
A sense of security in palliative homecare in a Norwegian municipality; dyadic comparisons of the perceptions of patients and relatives - a quantitative study.挪威一市安宁疗护中的安全感:患者和亲属感知的对偶比较——一项定量研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Jan 11;19(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-0513-7.
9
Proactive healthcare for frail elderly persons: study protocol for a prospective controlled primary care intervention in Sweden.衰弱老年人的主动医疗保健:瑞典一项前瞻性对照初级保健干预研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 22;9(5):e027847. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027847.
10
Self-reported health and quality of life outcomes of heart failure patients in the aftermath of a national economic crisis: a cross-sectional study.国家经济危机后心力衰竭患者的自我报告健康状况和生活质量结果:一项横断面研究。
ESC Heart Fail. 2019 Feb;6(1):111-121. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12369. Epub 2018 Oct 18.