Department of Dermatology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 Feb;80(2):417-424. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.09.026. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
This study was designed to assess the adherence to evidence-based guidelines of care for atopic dermatitis (AD).
To characterize AD treatment in the United States, ambulatory visits from the 2006-2015 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey were analyzed. For each medication prescribed, a grade was assigned on the basis of the American Academy of Dermatology treatment guidelines for topical and systemic medications. Considering all visit prescriptions, I calculated a composite grade, analogous to the US academic grading system (scores A-F).
I noted prescribing differences across specialty groups. Systemic corticosteroids were more likely to be prescribed by family and general physicians and less likely by pediatricians. Dermatologists were more likely than other specialties to prescribe nonsedating antihistamines, which lack a guideline base supporting their use. Depending upon modeling of care assumptions, all physician specialty visits earned mean guideline-based grades of B or C in their care of AD patients.
The clinical, social, and demographic factors influencing prescribing behavior cannot be completely assessed by using extant data.
This preliminary study demonstrates that physicians might benefit from reviewing guidelines of care; there might be an educational gap in the implementation of these guidelines.
本研究旨在评估特应性皮炎(AD)护理的循证指南遵循情况。
为了描述美国 AD 的治疗情况,对 2006-2015 年全国门诊医疗调查中的门诊就诊情况进行了分析。根据美国皮肤病学会(AAD)的外用和系统药物治疗指南,对开出的每种药物进行了分级。考虑到所有就诊处方,我计算了一个综合分级,类似于美国学术评分系统(A-F 评分)。
我注意到不同专业组之间存在处方差异。全身性皮质类固醇更可能由家庭和普通内科医生开具,而较少由儿科医生开具。与其他专业相比,皮肤科医生更有可能开出非镇静抗组胺药,这些药物缺乏支持其使用的指南依据。根据护理假设模型,所有医生专业的就诊在治疗 AD 患者时的指南基础评分均为 B 或 C。
使用现有数据无法完全评估影响处方行为的临床、社会和人口统计学因素。
这项初步研究表明,医生可能受益于审查护理指南;在这些指南的实施方面可能存在教育差距。