Suppr超能文献

抗组胺药在特应性皮炎治疗中的应用评估。

An assessment of the use of antihistamines in the management of atopic dermatitis.

机构信息

Center for Dermatology Research, Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.

Center for Dermatology Research, Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Department of Pathology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Department of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.

出版信息

J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018 Jul;79(1):92-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.12.077. Epub 2018 Jan 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Antihistamines are often used to treat pruritus associated with atopic dermatitis (AD) despite lack of evidence for their efficacy. The American Academy of Dermatology does not recommend the general use of antihistamines in the management of AD, although the value of short-term sedating antihistamine use for insomnia secondary to itch is recognized.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the use of sedating and nonsedating antihistamines for AD in 2003-2012.

METHODS

The National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey provided data on physician visits in 2003-2012. Sedating and nonsedating antihistamine use was identified at visits for AD.

RESULTS

There were 990,000 annual visits for AD. Antihistamines were prescribed for AD in a significant proportion of visits across physician specialties (16%-44%). Dermatologists and pediatricians primarily used sedating antihistamines (58%-70%), whereas the majority of family/general practitioners, internists, and other specialists prescribed nonsedating antihistamines for AD (55%-100%) LIMITATIONS: We were limited by the accuracy of AD diagnosis and medication recording.

CONCLUSIONS

Antihistamines are widely used for the treatment of AD. There is no high-level evidence to suggest that nonsedating antihistamines reduce itch in patients with AD or that sedating antihistamines provide benefit in controlling AD symptoms (except perhaps sleep and AD comorbidities, such as allergic rhinitis).

摘要

背景

尽管抗组胺药治疗特应性皮炎(AD)相关瘙痒的疗效缺乏证据,但仍常被用于治疗瘙痒。美国皮肤病学会不建议在 AD 的管理中常规使用抗组胺药,但承认短期使用镇静性抗组胺药治疗瘙痒引起的失眠是有价值的。

目的

评估 2003-2012 年镇静性和非镇静性抗组胺药在 AD 中的应用。

方法

国家门诊医疗调查提供了 2003-2012 年医生就诊的数据。在 AD 就诊时确定使用镇静性和非镇静性抗组胺药。

结果

每年有 99 万次 AD 就诊。在各专科医生的就诊中,相当一部分就诊中开具了抗组胺药(16%-44%)。皮肤科医生和儿科医生主要使用镇静性抗组胺药(58%-70%),而大多数家庭/全科医生、内科医生和其他专科医生为 AD 开具非镇静性抗组胺药(55%-100%)。

局限性

我们受到 AD 诊断和药物记录准确性的限制。

结论

抗组胺药广泛用于治疗 AD。没有高级别的证据表明非镇静性抗组胺药能减轻 AD 患者的瘙痒,也没有证据表明镇静性抗组胺药能控制 AD 症状(除了可能对睡眠和 AD 合并症如过敏性鼻炎有益)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验