Karl Florian M, Holle Rolf, Schwettmann Lars, Peters Annette, Meisinger Christa, Rückert-Eheberg Ina-Maria, Laxy Michael
Institute of Health Economics and Healthcare Management Helmholtz Zentrum München (GmbH) Neuherberg Germany.
German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD) Neuherberg Germany.
Health Sci Rep. 2020 May 5;3(2):e157. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.157. eCollection 2020 Jun.
Unrealistic comparative optimism (UO), as the erroneous judgement of personal risks to be lower than the risks of others, could help explain differences in diabetes self-management. The present study tested the hypothesis that individuals with type 2 diabetes who underestimate their comparative heart attack risk, have a lower adherence regarding recommended self-management.
We used data from individuals with type 2 diabetes participating in the German KORA (Cooperative Health Research in the Region of Augsburg) GEFU 4 (self-administered health questionnaire 2016) study. UO was estimated by comparing participants' subjective comparative risk for having a heart attack within the next 5-years (ie, "higher than others," "average," "lower than others"), with their objective comparative 10-year cardiovascular disease risk based on the Framingham equations. We estimated binary logistic and linear regression models to analyze which characteristics were associated with UO and to test the association between UO and participants' self-management behaviors (ie, regular self-monitoring of body weight, blood sugar, and blood pressure, regular foot care, keeping a diabetes diary, and having a diet plan), and their sum score, respectively. All models were adjusted for socio-demographic and disease-related variables.
The studied sample included n = 633 individuals with type 2 diabetes (mean age 70.7 years, 45% women). Smokers and males were more likely to show UO than nonsmokers and females. Furthermore, a higher blood pressure and a higher body mass index were associated with a higher likelihood of UO regarding heart attack risk. However, UO was not significantly associated with patient self-management.
Unfavorable health behavior and risk factors are associated with UO. However, our results suggest that UO with regard to perceived heart attack risk may not be a relevant factor for patient self-management in those with type 2 diabetes.
不切实际的比较性乐观(UO),即错误地判断个人风险低于他人风险,可能有助于解释糖尿病自我管理中的差异。本研究检验了以下假设:低估自身比较性心脏病发作风险的2型糖尿病患者,在推荐的自我管理方面依从性较低。
我们使用了参与德国奥格斯堡地区合作健康研究(KORA)GEFU 4(2016年自我管理健康问卷)研究的2型糖尿病患者的数据。通过比较参与者对未来5年内心脏病发作的主观比较风险(即“高于他人”、“平均”、“低于他人”)与基于弗雷明汉方程的客观比较10年心血管疾病风险来估计UO。我们估计了二元逻辑回归模型和线性回归模型,以分析哪些特征与UO相关,并分别检验UO与参与者自我管理行为(即定期自我监测体重、血糖和血压、定期足部护理、记录糖尿病日记以及制定饮食计划)及其总分之间的关联。所有模型均针对社会人口统计学和疾病相关变量进行了调整。
研究样本包括n = 633名2型糖尿病患者(平均年龄70.7岁,45%为女性)。吸烟者和男性比不吸烟者和女性更有可能表现出UO。此外,更高的血压和更高的体重指数与心脏病发作风险方面的UO可能性更高相关。然而,UO与患者自我管理没有显著关联。
不良健康行为和风险因素与UO相关。然而,我们的结果表明,在2型糖尿病患者中,关于感知到的心脏病发作风险的UO可能不是患者自我管理的相关因素。