• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

同伴支持对 2 型糖尿病成人自我效能和生活质量的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。

The effectiveness of peer support on self-efficacy and quality of life in adults with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

The first Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 2019 Apr;75(4):711-722. doi: 10.1111/jan.13870. Epub 2018 Nov 12.

DOI:10.1111/jan.13870
PMID:30289552
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Peer support has been suggested as a promising approach for diabetes management. No conclusive evidence exists on the effects of peer support on self-efficacy and quality of life in adults with type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of peer support on self-efficacy and the quality of life in adults with type 2 diabetes.

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.

DATA SOURCES

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Allied Health Literature database guide for relevant literatures from inception to 30 September 2017.

REVIEW METHODS

The review was conducted according to the guidelines of Cochrane Collaboration. The outcomes were self-efficacy and quality of life. The standardized mean difference and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for pooled results.

RESULTS

A total of 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. The pooled results revealed that peer support did not significantly improve self-efficacy and quality of life in adults with type 2 diabetes, but significantly improved self-efficacy and quality of life in studies with intervention duration ≤6 months. There was no evidence of publication bias.

CONCLUSION

Peer support intervention did not lead to better effects on the improvement in self-efficacy and quality of life among adults with type 2 diabetes. However, peer support with intervention duration not more than 6 months had positive effects on self-efficacy and quality of life. More high-quality studies with large sample size are needed to support or counter the results.

摘要

背景

同伴支持被认为是一种有前途的糖尿病管理方法。目前尚无确凿证据表明同伴支持对 2 型糖尿病成人的自我效能和生活质量有影响。

目的

评估同伴支持对 2 型糖尿病成人自我效能和生活质量的影响。

设计

系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

资料来源

我们从建库起至 2017 年 9 月 30 日,检索了 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 中心对照试验注册库和循证医学数据库指南,以获取相关文献。

综述方法

本综述按照 Cochrane 协作组的指南进行。结果为自我效能和生活质量。汇总结果计算标准化均数差和 95%置信区间。

结果

共有 15 项研究符合纳入标准。汇总结果显示,同伴支持并不能显著提高 2 型糖尿病成人的自我效能和生活质量,但在干预持续时间≤6 个月的研究中,自我效能和生活质量显著提高。不存在发表偏倚的证据。

结论

同伴支持干预对 2 型糖尿病成人自我效能和生活质量的改善没有更好的效果。然而,干预持续时间不超过 6 个月的同伴支持对自我效能和生活质量有积极影响。需要更多高质量、大样本量的研究来支持或反驳这一结果。

相似文献

1
The effectiveness of peer support on self-efficacy and quality of life in adults with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.同伴支持对 2 型糖尿病成人自我效能和生活质量的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Apr;75(4):711-722. doi: 10.1111/jan.13870. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
2
The effectiveness of the teach-back method on adherence and self-management in health education for people with chronic disease: a systematic review.反馈教学法对慢性病患者健康教育中依从性和自我管理的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Jan;14(1):210-47. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2296.
3
Effect of peer support intervention on diabetes distress in people with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.同伴支持干预对 2 型糖尿病患者糖尿病困扰的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Nurs Pract. 2020 Oct;26(5):e12830. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12830. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
4
Effect of peer support interventions in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review.同伴支持干预对2型糖尿病患者的影响:一项系统评价。
Patient Educ Couns. 2024 May;122:108172. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108172. Epub 2024 Jan 28.
5
Effectiveness of smartphone-based self-management interventions on self-efficacy, self-care activities, health-related quality of life and clinical outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.基于智能手机的自我管理干预对2型糖尿病患者自我效能、自我护理活动、健康相关生活质量及临床结局的有效性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Apr;116:103286. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.02.003. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
6
7
The effectiveness of peer support on self-efficacy and self-management in people with type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis.同伴支持对 2 型糖尿病患者自我效能和自我管理的有效性:荟萃分析。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Apr;104(4):760-769. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.11.011. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
8
9
What is the effect of peer support on diabetes outcomes in adults? A systematic review.同伴支持对成人糖尿病结局的影响如何?系统评价。
Diabet Med. 2012 Nov;29(11):1361-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03749.x.
10

引用本文的文献

1
The Experience of Fear of Complications Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Qualitative Study.2型糖尿病患者对并发症恐惧的体验:一项定性研究。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Aug 20;19:2553-2563. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S536379. eCollection 2025.
2
A common-sense model-based nursing intervention improves exercise compliance in coronary heart disease: a randomized controlled trial and a pilot study.基于常识模型的护理干预可提高冠心病患者的运动依从性:一项随机对照试验和一项试点研究。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Aug 8;12:1579015. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1579015. eCollection 2025.
3
Community interventions improve diabetes management and oral health in type 2 diabetes patients with chronic periodontitis.
社区干预可改善患有慢性牙周炎的2型糖尿病患者的糖尿病管理及口腔健康状况。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 8;15(1):24395. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09034-7.
4
Early Predictors of Quality of Life among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Southern Jordan.约旦南部2型糖尿病患者生活质量的早期预测指标
SAGE Open Nurs. 2025 Apr 27;11:23779608251323813. doi: 10.1177/23779608251323813. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
5
Effects of Personalized DiaBetes TEXT Messaging Combined with Peer Support Education on Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial.个性化糖尿病短信联合同伴支持教育对2型糖尿病患者的影响:一项随机对照试验
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025 Jan 29:19322968251314501. doi: 10.1177/19322968251314501.
6
The health-related quality of life of patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis.1 型和 2 型糖尿病患者的健康相关生活质量:一项荟萃分析。
Endocrine. 2024 Sep;85(3):1170-1177. doi: 10.1007/s12020-024-03824-1. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
7
Empowerment Enabled by Information and Communications Technology and Intention to Sustain a Healthy Behavior: Survey of General Users.信息通信技术赋权与维持健康行为意向:普通用户调查。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Nov 22;10:e47103. doi: 10.2196/47103.
8
Peer Support as Part of Scaling-Up Integrated Care in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Arterial Hypertension at the Primary Healthcare Level: A Study Protocol.同伴支持作为基层医疗层面扩大2型糖尿病和动脉高血压患者综合护理的一部分:一项研究方案
Zdr Varst. 2023 Mar 15;62(2):93-100. doi: 10.2478/sjph-2023-0013. eCollection 2023 Jun.
9
Effectiveness of Peer Support on Quality of Life and Anxiety in Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.同伴支持对乳腺癌患者生活质量和焦虑的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Breast Care (Basel). 2023 Feb;18(1):49-59. doi: 10.1159/000527849. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
10
The Effects of Self-Efficacy and Physical Activity Improving Methods on the Quality of Life in Patients with Diabetes: A Systematic Review.自我效能感和身体活动改善方法对糖尿病患者生活质量的影响:系统评价。
J Diabetes Res. 2022 Jul 27;2022:2884933. doi: 10.1155/2022/2884933. eCollection 2022.