• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

C3-7 关节融合术的长期预后:4 节段前路颈椎间盘切除融合术与颈椎后路减压融合术的比较。

Long-term fate of C3-7 arthrodesis: 4-level ACDF versus cervical laminectomy and fusion.

机构信息

Unit of Spinal Neurosurgery and Neurotrauma, Division of Neurosurgery, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA -

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA -

出版信息

J Neurosurg Sci. 2021 Aug;65(4):402-407. doi: 10.23736/S0390-5616.18.04563-0. Epub 2018 Oct 2.

DOI:10.23736/S0390-5616.18.04563-0
PMID:30290695
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) most commonly occurs at the C3-7 levels and is successfully treated by multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or cervical laminectomy and fusion (CLF), but no procedure has clearly demonstrated superiority. Most prior investigations comparing approaches are limited by marked heterogeneity in the composition of the study groups. This investigation compares ACDF versus CLF surgery specifically at C3-7 in terms of long-term neurological outcome and the fate of the adjacent levels.

METHODS

Over a twelve-year period, surgeries to treat CSM at C3-7 by ACDF or CLF were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic/clinical data were recorded, pre/postoperative modified Japanese orthopedic association scores (mJOA) were calculated, and any complications were noted.

RESULTS

Of 781 cervical surgery patients, 15 underwent C3-7 ACDF and 49 CLF. There were no differences in patient characteristics or pre/postoperative mJOA scores. Mean follow-up was 52 and 44 months for the anterior and posterior groups, respectively. A complication occurred in 3/15 (21%) of the anterior and 14/49 (28%) of the posterior group. No infections occurred in ACDF patients, but there were three in CLF patients. Pseudoarthrosis occurred in two ACDF patients, neither associated with symptoms. Four in the CLF group had asymptomatic pseudoarthrosis; two others needed reoperation for kyphosis at the inferior level.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term neurological improvement occurs following C3-7 ACDF and CLF to a similar degree. While not statistically significant, fewer complications, were seen following ACDF. The absence of symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) following ACDF in this series raises a question for further study whether the statistical likelihood of ASD changes once the C3-7 levels are already fused.

摘要

背景

颈椎脊髓病(CSM)最常发生在 C3-7 水平,通过多节段前路颈椎间盘切除术和融合术(ACDF)或颈椎板切除术和融合术(CLF)可成功治疗,但没有哪种手术方法明显具有优势。大多数比较手术方法的先前研究受到研究组组成明显异质性的限制。本研究比较了 C3-7 处 ACDF 与 CLF 手术在长期神经预后和相邻节段命运方面的效果。

方法

回顾性分析了 12 年间采用 ACDF 或 CLF 治疗 C3-7 颈椎脊髓病的手术。记录了人口统计学/临床数据,计算了术前/术后改良日本矫形协会评分(mJOA),并注意到任何并发症。

结果

在 781 例颈椎手术患者中,有 15 例行 C3-7 ACDF,49 例行 CLF。患者特征或术前/术后 mJOA 评分无差异。前路组和后路组的平均随访时间分别为 52 个月和 44 个月。前路组有 3/15(21%)例发生并发症,后路组有 14/49(28%)例发生并发症。ACDF 患者无感染,但 CLF 患者有 3 例。2 例 ACDF 患者发生假关节,均无症状。CLF 组有 4 例患者无症状性假关节;另有 2 例因下节段后凸畸形需要再次手术。

结论

C3-7 ACDF 和 CLF 均可获得类似程度的长期神经改善。虽然没有统计学意义,但 ACDF 组并发症较少。在本系列中,ACDF 后没有出现症状性相邻节段退变(ASD),这引发了一个进一步研究的问题,即一旦 C3-7 水平已经融合,ASD 的统计学可能性是否会发生变化。

相似文献

1
Long-term fate of C3-7 arthrodesis: 4-level ACDF versus cervical laminectomy and fusion.C3-7 关节融合术的长期预后:4 节段前路颈椎间盘切除融合术与颈椎后路减压融合术的比较。
J Neurosurg Sci. 2021 Aug;65(4):402-407. doi: 10.23736/S0390-5616.18.04563-0. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
2
Comparison of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Cervical Laminectomy and Fusion in the Treatment of 4-Level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.对比 4 节段脊髓型颈椎病的前路颈椎间盘切除融合术与后路颈椎板切除融合术。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Feb;14(2):229-237. doi: 10.1111/os.13058. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
3
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with stand-alone anchored cages versus posterior laminectomy and fusion for four-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective study with 2-year follow-up.前路颈椎间盘切除及独立锚定椎间融合器融合术与后路椎板切除术及融合术治疗四节段脊髓型颈椎病的回顾性研究:两年随访
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Jul 12;19(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2136-1.
4
Two-level corpectomy versus three-level discectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a comparison of perioperative, radiographic, and clinical outcomes.颈椎脊髓病的两级椎体次全切除术与三级椎间盘切除术:围手术期、影像学及临床结果比较
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Sep;23(3):280-9. doi: 10.3171/2014.12.SPINE14545. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
5
Is cervical disc arthroplasty good for congenital cervical stenosis?颈椎间盘置换术对先天性颈椎管狭窄症有益吗?
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 May;26(5):577-585. doi: 10.3171/2016.10.SPINE16317. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
6
Cervical spondylotic myelopathy with severe axial neck pain: is anterior or posterior approach better?伴有严重颈部轴性疼痛的脊髓型颈椎病:前路还是后路手术更好?
J Neurosurg Spine. 2022 Aug 26;38(1):42-55. doi: 10.3171/2022.6.SPINE22110. Print 2023 Jan 1.
7
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus corpectomy and fusion in treating two-level adjacent cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a minimum 5-year follow-up study.前路颈椎间盘切除融合术与椎体次全切除融合术治疗双节段相邻型脊髓型颈椎病的至少5年随访研究
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015 Feb;135(2):149-153. doi: 10.1007/s00402-014-2123-4. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
8
Comparison of the effect of anterior and posterior neurosurgical treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a clinical outcome.前后路神经外科手术治疗颈椎病脊髓病的疗效比较:临床结果。
Acta Neurol Belg. 2019 Dec;119(4):585-593. doi: 10.1007/s13760-019-01184-6. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
9
[Comparison of the outcomes between anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus posterior laminectomy and fusion for the treatment of multi-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy combined with cervical kyphosis].[前路颈椎间盘切除融合术与后路椎板切除融合术治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病合并颈椎后凸的疗效比较]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2016 Dec 20;96(47):3800-3804. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2016.47.007.
10
Analysis of Cervical Sagittal Balance in Treating Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: 1-Level Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion Versus 2-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.分析治疗颈椎病脊髓病的颈椎矢状平衡:1 级前路颈椎椎体切除术和融合术与 2 级前路颈椎间盘切除术和融合术。
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Jul 29;26:e923748. doi: 10.12659/MSM.923748.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing two surgical approaches for treating multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: A meta-analysis.比较两种手术方法治疗多节段颈椎病脊髓病:荟萃分析。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Oct;32(10):3485-3496. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07790-6. Epub 2023 Jul 1.
2
Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Decompression for Ossified Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Technical Note.内镜下颈椎后路骨化后纵韧带减压术:技术要点
Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Jun;17(3):356-363. doi: 10.14444/8453. Epub 2023 May 25.
3
Comparison of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Cervical Laminectomy and Fusion in the Treatment of 4-Level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.
对比 4 节段脊髓型颈椎病的前路颈椎间盘切除融合术与后路颈椎板切除融合术。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Feb;14(2):229-237. doi: 10.1111/os.13058. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
4
Dural Tear During Thoracic Laminectomy Using Craniotome With Footplate Attachment.使用带脚板附件的颅骨刀进行胸椎椎板切除术时的硬脑膜撕裂
Cureus. 2021 May 7;13(5):e14893. doi: 10.7759/cureus.14893.
5
Kyphosis Correction in Patients Undergoing a Four-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.接受四级前路颈椎间盘切除融合术患者的脊柱后凸矫正
Cureus. 2020 Jun 25;12(6):e8826. doi: 10.7759/cureus.8826.