Institute for Health and Sport (IHES), Victoria University, PO Box 14428, Melbourne, VIC, 8001, Australia.
School of Education, College of Design and Social Context, RMIT, PO Box 71, Melbourne, VIC, 3083, Australia.
BMC Public Health. 2018 Oct 5;18(1):1162. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6075-4.
There is growing evidence of the public health benefits of promoting cycling. The ways that the built environment and perceived social norms independently influence cycling participation is well established. However, whether these factors interact to influence cycling participation has not been examined. Such research is important because understanding the effect of multiple socio-ecological factors and the interactions between them is needed to guide the development of interventions and strategies to increase cycling participation. Therefore, the aim of this study is to explore the interactive effects of the built environment and perceived social norms on transport and recreational cycling.
Data was collected using a self-administered online questionnaire from 228 office workers in Metropolitan Melbourne, Australia. Measures used in previous research were employed to assess self-reported transport and recreation cycling in the last week, perceptions of neighbourhood built environment, perceived social norms towards cycling, and objective land-use mix, residential density and street connectivity of the suburbs in which participants lived and work. Multiple binary logistic regression analyses were conducted to explore the interactive effects of the built environment and perceived social norms on transport and recreation cycling. All interactive effects were considered significant at p < 0.10.
There was a significant interactive effect between the workplace built environment and perceived group norm on transport cycling (p = 0.06). There were no other significant interactive effects observed between components of the built environment and perceived social norms on transport or recreational cycling.
The interactive effect found in this study provides some evidence that the workplace built environment interacts with perceived group norms to influence cycling for transport. Positive perceptions of the workplace built environment, such as showers and secure bike racks, can somewhat compensate for the negative influence of when cycling is considered less of a norm among, family, friend or colleagues. However, the findings of this study did not support that the neighbourhood built environment and perceived social norms interact to influence cycling for recreation or transport. These findings contribute to the knowledge of how multiple factors may reciprocate to influence individual's decision to cycle. More research into the interactive effects of socio-ecological factors is warranted.
越来越多的证据表明,促进骑自行车出行对公众健康有益。建成环境和感知到的社会规范独立影响骑自行车出行的方式已得到充分证实。然而,这些因素是否相互作用影响骑自行车出行尚未得到检验。此类研究很重要,因为了解多种社会生态因素的影响及其相互作用,有助于指导干预措施和增加自行车出行策略的制定。因此,本研究旨在探讨建成环境和感知到的社会规范对交通和休闲自行车骑行的交互影响。
本研究使用澳大利亚墨尔本大都市地区 228 名上班族的自我管理在线问卷收集数据。采用先前研究中使用的测量方法,评估参与者在过去一周内的交通和休闲自行车骑行情况、对邻里建成环境的感知、对骑自行车的感知社会规范以及参与者居住和工作的郊区的客观土地利用混合、居住密度和街道连通性。进行了多项二元逻辑回归分析,以探讨建成环境和感知到的社会规范对交通和休闲自行车骑行的交互影响。所有交互效应均在 p<0.10 时被认为具有统计学意义。
工作场所建成环境与感知群体规范对交通自行车骑行有显著的交互作用(p=0.06)。在交通或休闲自行车骑行方面,建成环境各组成部分与感知社会规范之间没有观察到其他显著的交互作用。
本研究发现的交互效应提供了一些证据表明,工作场所建成环境与感知群体规范相互作用,影响交通自行车骑行。对工作场所建成环境的积极看法,例如淋浴间和安全自行车架,可以在一定程度上弥补当骑自行车在家人、朋友或同事中不被视为常态时的负面影响。然而,本研究的结果并不支持邻里建成环境和感知社会规范相互作用影响休闲或交通自行车骑行的观点。这些发现有助于了解多个因素如何相互作用影响个人骑自行车的决策。需要进一步研究社会生态因素的交互效应。