van de Donk Niels Wcj, van der Holt Bronno, Minnema Monique C, Vellenga Edo, Croockewit Sandra, Kersten Marie José, von dem Borne Peter A, Ypma Paula, Schaafsma Ron, de Weerdt Okke, Klein Saskia K, Delforge Michel, Levin Mark-David, Bos Gerard M, Jie Kon-Siong G, Sinnige Harm, Coenen Jules Llm, de Waal Esther G, Zweegman Sonja, Sonneveld Pieter, Lokhorst Henk M
Department of Haematology, VU University Medical Centre, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
HOVON Data Centre, Department of Haematology, Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Lancet Haematol. 2018 Oct;5(10):e479-e492. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(18)30149-2.
In patients with recently diagnosed multiple myeloma, the HOVON-50 phase 3 trial showed improved event-free survival for thalidomide-containing induction and maintenance regimens (in conjunction with high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation [auto-SCT]) after a median of 52 months of follow-up, by comparison with regimens containing classical cytotoxic drugs. In this follow-up analysis, we aimed to determine the long-term effects of thalidomide in induction and maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma.
In this open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial, patients with recently diagnosed multiple myeloma were recruited from 44 Dutch and Belgian hospitals. Participants had been diagnosed with multiple myeloma of Durie-Salmon stage II or III and were aged 18-65 years. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) either to receive three 28-day cycles of vincristine (0·4 mg, intravenous rapid infusion on days 1-4), doxorubicin (9 mg/m, intravenous rapid infusion on days 1-4) and dexamethasone (40 mg, orally on days 1-4, 9-12, and 17-20; control group); or to receive the same regimen, but with thalidomide (200-400 mg, orally on days 1-28) instead of vincristine (thalidomide group). No masking after assignment to intervention was used. Patients were randomly assigned to groups, stratified by centre and treatment policy (one vs two courses of high-dose melphalan and auto-SCT). After stem cell harvest, patients received one or two courses of 200 mg/m melphalan intravenously with auto-SCT. Patients with at least a partial response to high-dose melphalan and auto-SCT were eligible for maintenance therapy, starting 2-3 months after high-dose melphalan. Patients in the control group received maintenance therapy with interferon alfa (3 × 10 international units, subcutaneously, three times weekly). Patients in the thalidomide group received thalidomide as maintenance therapy (50 mg, orally, daily). Maintenance therapy was given until relapse, progression, or the occurrence of adverse events. The primary endpoint of the study was event-free survival (EFSc; censored at allogeneic stem cell transplantation), analysed by intention to treat. The study is closed for enrolment and this Article represents the final analysis. This trial was registered with the Netherlands Trial Register, number NTR238.
Between Nov 27, 2001 and May 31, 2005, 556 patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 536 (96%) were eligible for evaluation and were randomly allocated (268 [50%] to the control group and 268 [50%] to the thalidomide group). These 536 patients were assessed for the primary endpoint of EFSc. At an extended median follow-up of 129 months (IQR 123-136), EFSc was significantly longer in the thalidomide group compared with the control group (multivariate analysis hazard ratio [HR] 0·62, 95% CI 0·50-0·77; p<0·0001). Thalidomide maintenance was stopped because of toxicity in 65 (42%) of 155 patients in the thalidomide group (neuropathy in 49 [75%] patients, skin reactions in four [6%] patients, fatigue in two [3%] patients, and as other symptoms [such as abdominal pain, pancreatitis, and dyspnoea] in ten [15%] patients). 24 (27%) of 90 patients in the control group discontinued protocol treatment during maintenance therapy with interferon alfa because of toxicity (five [21%] patients with psychiatric side-effects, five [21%] patients with flu-like symptoms, four [17%] patients with haematological toxicity [thrombocytopenia and leucocytopenia], three [13%] patients with skin reactions, and seven [29%] patients with other symptoms [such as infections, cardiomyopathy, and headache]). The frequency of second primary malignancies was similar in both groups. There were 23 second primary malignancies in 17 patients in the control group and 29 second primary malignancies in 24 patients in the thalidomide group. There were 19 treatment-related deaths in the control group, and 16 treatment-related deaths in the thalidomide group.
Our data indicate that thalidomide-based treatment could be a treatment option for patients with multiple myeloma who are eligible for auto-SCT who live in countries without access to proteasome inhibitors or lenalidomide. However, careful follow-up and timely dose adjustments are important to prevent the development of thalidomide-induced neurotoxicity.
The Dutch Cancer Foundation.
在近期诊断为多发性骨髓瘤的患者中,HOVON-50 3期试验显示,在中位随访52个月后,与含传统细胞毒性药物的方案相比,含沙利度胺的诱导和维持方案(联合大剂量美法仑和自体干细胞移植[auto-SCT])可改善无事件生存期。在这项随访分析中,我们旨在确定沙利度胺在多发性骨髓瘤诱导和维持治疗中的长期效果。
在这项开放标签的3期随机对照试验中,从44家荷兰和比利时医院招募近期诊断为多发性骨髓瘤的患者。参与者被诊断为Durie-Salmon II期或III期多发性骨髓瘤,年龄在18-65岁之间。患者被随机分配(1:1)接受三个28天周期的长春新碱(0.4 mg,第1-4天静脉快速输注)、阿霉素(9 mg/m²,第1-4天静脉快速输注)和地塞米松(40 mg,第1-4天、9-12天和17-20天口服;对照组);或接受相同方案,但用沙利度胺(200-400 mg,第1-28天口服)代替长春新碱(沙利度胺组)。分配至干预措施后不采用盲法。患者按中心和治疗策略(一疗程或两疗程大剂量美法仑和auto-SCT)分层随机分组。干细胞采集后,患者接受一疗程或两疗程200 mg/m²美法仑静脉输注及auto-SCT。对大剂量美法仑和auto-SCT至少有部分反应的患者有资格接受维持治疗,在大剂量美法仑后2-3个月开始。对照组患者接受干扰素α(3×10⁶国际单位,皮下注射,每周三次)维持治疗。沙利度胺组患者接受沙利度胺作为维持治疗(50 mg,口服,每日)。维持治疗持续至复发、进展或出现不良事件。研究的主要终点是无事件生存期(EFSc;在异基因干细胞移植时截尾),采用意向性分析。该研究已结束入组,本文代表最终分析。本试验已在荷兰试验注册中心注册,编号为NTR238。
2001年11月27日至2005年5月31日期间,556例患者入组本研究,其中536例(96%)符合评估条件并被随机分配(268例[50%]至对照组,268例[50%]至沙利度胺组)。对这536例患者评估了EFSc这一主要终点。在延长的中位随访129个月(IQR 123-136)时,沙利度胺组的EFSc显著长于对照组(多变量分析风险比[HR]0.62,95%CI 0.50-0.77;p<0.0001)。沙利度胺组155例患者中有65例(42%)因毒性停止沙利度胺维持治疗(49例[75%]患者出现神经病变,4例[6%]患者出现皮肤反应,2例[3%]患者出现疲劳以及10例[15%]患者出现其他症状[如腹痛、胰腺炎和呼吸困难])。对照组90例患者中有24例(27%)在干扰素α维持治疗期间因毒性停止方案治疗(5例[21%]患者出现精神副作用,5例[21%]患者出现流感样症状,4例[17%]患者出现血液学毒性[血小板减少和白细胞减少],3例[13%]患者出现皮肤反应,7例[29%]患者出现其他症状[如感染、心肌病和头痛])。两组中第二原发性恶性肿瘤的发生率相似。对照组17例患者中有23例第二原发性恶性肿瘤,沙利度胺组24例患者中有29例第二原发性恶性肿瘤。对照组有19例治疗相关死亡,沙利度胺组有16例治疗相关死亡。
我们的数据表明,对于有资格接受auto-SCT且所在国家无法获得蛋白酶体抑制剂或来那度胺的多发性骨髓瘤患者,基于沙利度胺的治疗可能是一种治疗选择。然而,仔细的随访和及时的剂量调整对于预防沙利度胺诱导的神经毒性的发生很重要。
荷兰癌症基金会。