Friedrich Julia, Mückschel Moritz, Beste Christian
Cognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Germany.
Cognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Germany; MS Centre Dresden, Faculty of Medicine of the TU Dresden, Germany.
Behav Brain Res. 2019 Feb 1;359:597-608. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2018.10.006. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
Response inhibition is a central aspect of cognitive control. Yet, only recently the role of sensory mechanisms for response inhibition has been addressed and neurophysiological mechanisms are far from being understood. Here we ask in how far the physical intensity of stimuli is a relevant perceptual factor modulating motor inhibitory control. We investigated how different physical (objective) stimulus and the subjectively perceived stimulus magnitude modulated response inhibition and its neurophysiological correlates. To this end we used a somatosensory GO/NOGO task in combination with EEG recordings and applied temporal signal decomposition and source localization methods. The behavioral (false alarm) data clearly demonstrated that response inhibition performance was worse in the subjective and objective stimulation condition as compared to the reference stimulation condition with higher stimulus magnitude. Despite primary perceptual aspects were manipulated, neurophysiological correlates of lower-level perceptual and attentional selection processes did not explain effects on overt response inhibition behavior. Rather, neurophysiological processes at the response selection level were modulated. These were associated with activation differences in the right inferior frontal gyrus and suggest that "braking processes" enabling the inhibition of a to-be-executed motor response were modulated. The modulation of these braking processes depends on objective physical magnitude of incoming sensory information and not the subjectively perceived stimulus magnitude.
反应抑制是认知控制的核心方面。然而,直到最近,感觉机制在反应抑制中的作用才得到探讨,其神经生理机制仍远未被理解。在这里,我们探讨刺激的物理强度在多大程度上是调节运动抑制控制的一个相关感知因素。我们研究了不同的物理(客观)刺激以及主观感知的刺激强度如何调节反应抑制及其神经生理相关性。为此,我们使用了一个体感“执行/不执行”任务,并结合脑电图记录,应用了时间信号分解和源定位方法。行为学(虚报)数据清楚地表明,与具有较高刺激强度的参考刺激条件相比,在主观和客观刺激条件下,反应抑制表现更差。尽管主要的感知方面受到了操控,但较低层次的感知和注意力选择过程的神经生理相关性并不能解释对明显反应抑制行为的影响。相反,反应选择水平的神经生理过程受到了调节。这些与右侧额下回的激活差异有关,表明能够抑制即将执行的运动反应的“制动过程”受到了调节。这些制动过程的调节取决于传入感觉信息的客观物理强度,而不是主观感知的刺激强度。