Suppr超能文献

关于反应抑制过程对感觉模态的依赖性。

On the dependence of response inhibition processes on sensory modality.

作者信息

Bodmer Benjamin, Beste Christian

机构信息

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Cognitive Neurophysiology, Faculty of Medicine of the TU, Dresden, Germnay.

Experimental Neurobiology, National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Apr;38(4):1941-1951. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23495. Epub 2017 Jan 3.

Abstract

The ability to inhibit responses is a central sensorimotor function but only recently the importance of sensory processes for motor inhibition mechanisms went more into the research focus. In this regard it is elusive, whether there are differences between sensory modalities to trigger response inhibition processes. Due to functional neuroanatomical considerations strong differences may exist, for example, between the visual and the tactile modality. In the current study we examine what neurophysiological mechanisms as well as functional neuroanatomical networks are modulated during response inhibition. Therefore, a Go/NoGo-paradigm employing a novel combination of visual, tactile, and visuotactile stimuli was used. The data show that the tactile modality is more powerful than the visual modality to trigger response inhibition processes. However, the tactile modality loses its efficacy to trigger response inhibition processes when being combined with the visual modality. This may be due to competitive mechanisms leading to a suppression of certain sensory stimuli and the response selection level. Variations in sensory modalities specifically affected conflict monitoring processes during response inhibition by modulating activity in a frontal parietal network including the right inferior frontal gyrus, anterior cingulate cortex and the temporoparietal junction. Attentional selection processes are not modulated. The results suggest that the functional neuroanatomical networks involved in response inhibition critically depends on the nature of the sensory input. Hum Brain Mapp 38:1941-1951, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

摘要

抑制反应的能力是一种核心的感觉运动功能,但直到最近,感觉过程对运动抑制机制的重要性才更多地成为研究焦点。在这方面,尚不清楚不同感觉模态在触发反应抑制过程中是否存在差异。基于功能神经解剖学的考虑,例如视觉和触觉模态之间可能存在显著差异。在当前的研究中,我们研究了在反应抑制过程中哪些神经生理机制以及功能神经解剖网络受到了调制。因此,我们采用了一种结合视觉、触觉和视觉触觉刺激的新的Go/NoGo范式。数据表明,触觉模态比视觉模态更能有效地触发反应抑制过程。然而,当触觉模态与视觉模态结合时,其触发反应抑制过程的效力会降低。这可能是由于竞争机制导致某些感觉刺激和反应选择水平受到抑制。感觉模态的变化通过调节包括右侧额下回、前扣带回皮质和颞顶叶交界处在内的额顶网络的活动,特别影响了反应抑制过程中的冲突监测。注意选择过程不受调制。结果表明,参与反应抑制的功能神经解剖网络严重依赖于感觉输入的性质。《人类大脑图谱》38:1941 - 1951,2017年。©2017威利期刊公司。

相似文献

7
How perceptual ambiguity affects response inhibition processes.感知歧义如何影响反应抑制过程。
J Neurophysiol. 2019 Aug 1;122(2):500-511. doi: 10.1152/jn.00298.2019. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
9
Sequential neural processes of tactile-visual crossmodal working memory.触觉-视觉跨模态工作记忆的序列神经过程。
Neuroscience. 2006 Apr 28;139(1):299-309. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.05.058. Epub 2005 Dec 1.

引用本文的文献

6
Cognitive Neural Mechanism of Backward Inhibition and Deinhibition: A Review.逆向抑制与去抑制的认知神经机制:综述
Front Behav Neurosci. 2022 May 20;16:846369. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.846369. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

5
Understanding the role of the primary somatosensory cortex: Opportunities for rehabilitation.了解初级体感皮层的作用:康复的机遇。
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Dec;79(Pt B):246-55. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.07.007. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
9
Re-evaluating the role of TPJ in attentional control: contextual updating?重新评估 TPJ 在注意力控制中的作用:上下文更新?
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Dec;37(10 Pt 2):2608-20. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.08.010. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
10
Inhibition and impulsivity: behavioral and neural basis of response control.抑制和冲动:反应控制的行为和神经基础。
Prog Neurobiol. 2013 Sep;108:44-79. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.06.005. Epub 2013 Jul 13.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验