Bodmer Benjamin, Beste Christian
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Cognitive Neurophysiology, Faculty of Medicine of the TU, Dresden, Germnay.
Experimental Neurobiology, National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Apr;38(4):1941-1951. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23495. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
The ability to inhibit responses is a central sensorimotor function but only recently the importance of sensory processes for motor inhibition mechanisms went more into the research focus. In this regard it is elusive, whether there are differences between sensory modalities to trigger response inhibition processes. Due to functional neuroanatomical considerations strong differences may exist, for example, between the visual and the tactile modality. In the current study we examine what neurophysiological mechanisms as well as functional neuroanatomical networks are modulated during response inhibition. Therefore, a Go/NoGo-paradigm employing a novel combination of visual, tactile, and visuotactile stimuli was used. The data show that the tactile modality is more powerful than the visual modality to trigger response inhibition processes. However, the tactile modality loses its efficacy to trigger response inhibition processes when being combined with the visual modality. This may be due to competitive mechanisms leading to a suppression of certain sensory stimuli and the response selection level. Variations in sensory modalities specifically affected conflict monitoring processes during response inhibition by modulating activity in a frontal parietal network including the right inferior frontal gyrus, anterior cingulate cortex and the temporoparietal junction. Attentional selection processes are not modulated. The results suggest that the functional neuroanatomical networks involved in response inhibition critically depends on the nature of the sensory input. Hum Brain Mapp 38:1941-1951, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
抑制反应的能力是一种核心的感觉运动功能,但直到最近,感觉过程对运动抑制机制的重要性才更多地成为研究焦点。在这方面,尚不清楚不同感觉模态在触发反应抑制过程中是否存在差异。基于功能神经解剖学的考虑,例如视觉和触觉模态之间可能存在显著差异。在当前的研究中,我们研究了在反应抑制过程中哪些神经生理机制以及功能神经解剖网络受到了调制。因此,我们采用了一种结合视觉、触觉和视觉触觉刺激的新的Go/NoGo范式。数据表明,触觉模态比视觉模态更能有效地触发反应抑制过程。然而,当触觉模态与视觉模态结合时,其触发反应抑制过程的效力会降低。这可能是由于竞争机制导致某些感觉刺激和反应选择水平受到抑制。感觉模态的变化通过调节包括右侧额下回、前扣带回皮质和颞顶叶交界处在内的额顶网络的活动,特别影响了反应抑制过程中的冲突监测。注意选择过程不受调制。结果表明,参与反应抑制的功能神经解剖网络严重依赖于感觉输入的性质。《人类大脑图谱》38:1941 - 1951,2017年。©2017威利期刊公司。