KU Leuven (University of Leuven), Department of Oral Health Sciences, BIOMAT & UZ Leuven (University Hospitals Leuven), Dentistry, Kapucijnenvoer 7, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium; Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Department of Dentistry, Operative Dentistry, Campus Reitor João David Ferreira Lima, s/n - Trindade, Florianópolis, SC, 88040-900, Brazil.
KU Leuven (University of Leuven), Department of Oral Health Sciences, BIOMAT & UZ Leuven (University Hospitals Leuven), Dentistry, Kapucijnenvoer 7, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Dent Mater. 2018 Nov;34(11):1679-1689. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.08.303. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
Dentin biomodification using collagen cross-linkers has been proposed as one of the strategies to improve bond durability of adhesives to dentin. However, literature is not very consistent regarding their benefit, in particular when cross-linkers are applied in clinically realistic application times. This study investigated the effect of three cross-linkers on the mini-interfacial fracture toughness (mini-iFT) of four adhesives bonded to dentin following either etch&rinse (E&R) or self-etch (SE) modes.
60 molars were randomly divided in accordance with the three variables: cross-linker, adhesive and bonding mode (n=5). The cross-linkers glutaraldehyde (5wt%; GA), proanthocyanidin (6.5wt%; PA), or UVA-activated riboflavin (0.5wt%; RB), and distilled water (control) were applied on dentin for 60s after acid-etching (E&R) or before self-etching (SE). The 3-step E&R adhesive (3E&Ra) OptiBond FL (Kerr), the 2-step SE adhesive (2SEa) Clearfil SE Bond 2 (Kuraray Noritake) and the universal adhesives G-Premio Bond (GC) and Prime&Bond Active (Dentsply), the latter two employed in both E&R and SE modes, were applied following the respective manufacturer's instructions. Composite buildups (8×8×8mm) were made using Filtek Supreme XTE (3M) prior to 1-week storage in artificial saliva. After the teeth were sectioned into mini-specimens (1.5×2.0×18mm), a single notch was prepared at the adhesive-dentin interface. Half of the specimens were immediately loaded until failure by 4-point bending to determine the mini-iFT, while the remaining specimen set was tested upon 6-month aging. Data were statistically analyzed with a linear model (p<0.05).
No significant decrease in mini-iFT was noted only for PA (p<0.05), while the mini-iFT decreased for both other cross-linkers and in quite a similar way as when solely water (Wa) was applied.
The cross-linker proanthocyanidin (PA) applied in clinically relevant conditions was able to maintain a stable mini-iFT after 6-month aging. The incorporation of UVA-activated riboflavin (RB) and glutaraldehyde (GA) in the dentin-bonding protocol appeared not effective to improve the stability of adhesive-dentin interfaces.
使用胶原交联剂对牙本质进行生物修饰已被提议作为提高牙本质胶粘剂耐久性的策略之一。然而,文献对于它们的益处并不十分一致,特别是当交联剂在临床现实的应用时间内使用时。本研究调查了三种交联剂对四种胶粘剂在酸蚀-冲洗(E&R)或自酸蚀(SE)模式下粘结到牙本质后的微型界面断裂韧性(mini-iFT)的影响。
60 个磨牙随机分为三个变量:交联剂、胶粘剂和粘结模式(n=5)。交联剂戊二醛(5wt%;GA)、原花青素(6.5wt%;PA)或 UVA 激活核黄素(0.5wt%;RB)和蒸馏水(对照)在酸蚀(E&R)后或自酸蚀(SE)前涂于牙本质上 60s。3 步 E&R 胶粘剂(3E&Ra)OptiBond FL(Kerr)、2 步 SE 胶粘剂(2SEa)Clearfil SE Bond 2(Kuraray Noritake)和通用胶粘剂 G-Premio Bond(GC)和 Prime&Bond Active(Dentsply),后两者在 E&R 和 SE 模式下均有使用,按照各自制造商的说明进行应用。在人工唾液中储存 1 周之前,用 Filtek Supreme XTE(3M)进行复合堆积(8×8×8mm)。牙齿被切成微型试件(1.5×2.0×18mm)后,在胶粘剂-牙本质界面处制备单个缺口。一半的试件立即进行四点弯曲加载直至失效,以确定 mini-iFT,而其余试件组在 6 个月老化后进行测试。数据采用线性模型进行统计学分析(p<0.05)。
只有 PA(p<0.05)的 mini-iFT 没有明显下降,而其他两种交联剂以及单独用水(Wa)处理的 mini-iFT 均下降。
在临床相关条件下应用的原花青素(PA)交联剂能够在 6 个月老化后保持稳定的 mini-iFT。在牙本质粘结方案中加入 UVA 激活核黄素(RB)和戊二醛(GA)似乎并不能有效提高胶粘剂-牙本质界面的稳定性。