• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床实验室通过公共数据库共享变异数据:同意、隐私和进一步研究政策的联系。

Variant data sharing by clinical laboratories through public databases: consent, privacy and further contact for research policies.

机构信息

Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

出版信息

Genet Med. 2019 May;21(5):1031-1037. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0316-x. Epub 2018 Oct 8.

DOI:10.1038/s41436-018-0316-x
PMID:30293992
Abstract

Access to detailed variant data is key to inform and verify the interpretation of genomic data. Clinical laboratories can play a significant role in sharing patients' data through public variant databases. To facilitate data sharing, various public databases, such as ClinVar and DECIPHER have been established, which accept data submission from laboratories, clinicians, researchers, and patients. Despite clear benefits to sharing, questions may arise about the adequate form of consent to be obtained from patients when sharing data from their clinical tests through public databases. In this paper, we provide an overview and critical analysis of the relevant consent policies of the major public databases, and of the consent forms of clinical laboratories that share variant data via ClinVar.

摘要

获取详细的变异数据对于解释和验证基因组数据至关重要。临床实验室可以通过公共变异数据库在分享患者数据方面发挥重要作用。为了促进数据共享,已经建立了各种公共数据库,如 ClinVar 和 DECIPHER,这些数据库接受来自实验室、临床医生、研究人员和患者的数据提交。尽管共享数据有明显的好处,但在通过公共数据库共享患者临床检测数据时,如何获得患者充分的同意可能会引起争议。在本文中,我们对主要公共数据库的相关同意政策以及通过 ClinVar 分享变异数据的临床实验室的同意表格进行了概述和批判性分析。

相似文献

1
Variant data sharing by clinical laboratories through public databases: consent, privacy and further contact for research policies.临床实验室通过公共数据库共享变异数据:同意、隐私和进一步研究政策的联系。
Genet Med. 2019 May;21(5):1031-1037. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0316-x. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
2
Points to consider for sharing variant-level information from clinical genetic testing with ClinVar.关于将临床基因检测的变异水平信息分享至ClinVar需考虑的要点。
Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud. 2018 Feb 1;4(1). doi: 10.1101/mcs.a002345. Print 2018 Feb.
3
Shariant platform: Enabling evidence sharing across Australian clinical genetic-testing laboratories to support variant interpretation.Shariant 平台:实现澳大利亚临床基因检测实验室之间的证据共享,以支持变异解释。
Am J Hum Genet. 2022 Nov 3;109(11):1960-1973. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.10.006.
4
To share or not to share: a randomized trial of consent for data sharing in genome research.是否共享:基因组研究中数据共享同意的随机试验。
Genet Med. 2011 Nov;13(11):948-55. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3182227589.
5
Development of a consent resource for genomic data sharing in the clinical setting.制定临床环境下基因组数据共享同意书资源。
Genet Med. 2019 Jan;21(1):81-88. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0017-5. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
6
GenoShare: Supporting Privacy-Informed Decisions for Sharing Individual-Level Genetic Data.基因共享:支持在保护隐私前提下共享个人层面基因数据的决策
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2020 Jun 16;270:238-241. doi: 10.3233/SHTI200158.
7
Clinical laboratories collaborate to resolve differences in variant interpretations submitted to ClinVar.临床实验室合作解决提交给 ClinVar 的变异解释差异。
Genet Med. 2017 Oct;19(10):1096-1104. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.14. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
8
Regulatory Frameworks for Clinical Trial Data Sharing: Scoping Review.监管框架临床试验数据共享:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 May 4;24(5):e33591. doi: 10.2196/33591.
9
Genomic Data-Sharing Practices.基因组数据共享实践。
J Law Med Ethics. 2019 Mar;47(1):31-40. doi: 10.1177/1073110519840482.
10
ClinGen's GenomeConnect registry enables patient-centered data sharing.ClinGen 的 GenomeConnect 注册系统支持以患者为中心的数据共享。
Hum Mutat. 2018 Nov;39(11):1668-1676. doi: 10.1002/humu.23633.

引用本文的文献

1
Increasing pathogenic germline variant diagnosis rates in precision medicine: current best practices and future opportunities.提高精准医学中致病种系变异的诊断率:当前最佳实践与未来机遇
Hum Genomics. 2025 Aug 22;19(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s40246-025-00811-z.
2
A Comparative Review of ICMR, WHO, and EMA Guidelines for Good Clinical Laboratory Practices.印度医学研究理事会、世界卫生组织和欧洲药品管理局《良好临床实验室规范指南》的比较综述
J Lab Physicians. 2022 Oct 20;15(2):179-186. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1757237. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
Federated Analysis for Privacy-Preserving Data Sharing: A Technical and Legal Primer.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical genomics, big data, and electronic medical records: reconciling patient rights with research when privacy and science collide.临床基因组学、大数据与电子病历:当隐私与科学发生冲突时,如何在研究中兼顾患者权利
J Law Biosci. 2017 Jan 15;4(1):94-132. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsw061. eCollection 2017 Apr.
联邦分析用于隐私保护的数据共享:技术和法律基础
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2023 Aug 25;24:347-368. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-110122-084756. Epub 2023 May 30.
4
Functional genomics of OCTN2 variants informs protein-specific variant effect predictor for Carnitine Transporter Deficiency.OCTN2 变体的功能基因组学为肉碱转运体缺乏症提供了蛋白质特异性变体效应预测器。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Nov 16;119(46):e2210247119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2210247119. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
5
Recent Developments in Privacy-Preserving Mining of Clinical Data.临床数据隐私保护挖掘的最新进展
ACM IMS Trans Data Sci. 2021 Nov;2(4). doi: 10.1145/3447774.
6
Genomic variant sharing: a position statement.基因组变异共享:立场声明。
Wellcome Open Res. 2019 Feb 5;4:22. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15090.2. eCollection 2019.
7
Rethinking the ethical principles of genomic medicine services.重新思考基因组医学服务的伦理原则。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2020 Feb;28(2):147-154. doi: 10.1038/s41431-019-0507-1. Epub 2019 Sep 18.