Gomez Rapson, Vance Alasdair, Stavropoulos Vasileios
Cairnmillar Institute, Hawthorn East, Victoria, Australia.
Federation University Australia, Mount Helen, Victoria, Australia.
Assessment. 2020 Oct;27(7):1463-1475. doi: 10.1177/1073191118803714. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
This study used the correlated trait-correlated method minus one model to examine the convergent and discriminant validity of the scales of the Conners 3 Short [C 3 (S)]. The C 3 (S) scales in the analysis were inattention (IN), hyperactivity/impulsivity (HY), learning problems (LP; learning problems/executive functioning from the teacher version), aggression (AG), and peer relations (PR, only for parent and teacher versions). A total of 529 adolescents and children (75% males, mean age = 11.75 years, = 2.97 years) provided self-ratings, and were also rated by their mothers and teachers. The findings indicated no support for the convergence of IN and HY across the three respondents. In contrast, there was convergence for LP, AG, and PR. There was support for the discriminant validity of the traits, except between IN and HY. The findings are discussed in relation to the convergent and discriminant validity of the C 3 (S) measures, and the clinical use of the C 3 (S).
本研究采用相关特质相关方法减一模型,检验康纳斯3简版量表[C 3 (S)]各分量表的聚合效度和区分效度。分析中的C 3 (S)分量表包括注意力不集中(IN)、多动/冲动(HY)、学习问题(LP;教师版中的学习问题/执行功能)、攻击行为(AG)和同伴关系(PR,仅适用于家长版和教师版)。共有529名青少年和儿童(75%为男性,平均年龄 = 11.75岁,标准差 = 2.97岁)进行了自评,同时他们的母亲和教师也对其进行了评分。研究结果表明,在三位受访者中,未发现IN和HY的聚合效度。相比之下,LP、AG和PR存在聚合效度。除IN和HY之间外,各特质的区分效度均得到支持。本文结合C 3 (S)量表的聚合效度和区分效度以及C 3 (S)量表的临床应用对研究结果进行了讨论。