• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1 型糖尿病患儿及其家庭应用胰岛素泵治疗的心理社会获益:Pumpkin 多中心随机对照试验。

Psychosocial benefits of insulin pump therapy in children with diabetes type 1 and their families: The pumpkin multicenter randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, University of Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany.

Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, University of Luebeck, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany.

出版信息

Pediatr Diabetes. 2018 Dec;19(8):1471-1480. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12777. Epub 2018 Oct 10.

DOI:10.1111/pedi.12777
PMID:30302877
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) is on the rise among pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Metabolic effects alone cannot explain this rising popularity. From the patient's perspective, the main benefits of CSII may be found in subjective psychosocial health outcomes (patient-reported outcomes [PRO]).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

In a multicenter open randomized controlled trial, children and adolescents aged 6 to16 years currently treated with multiple daily injections (MDI) were randomized 1:1, stratified by center, to either starting with CSII immediately after the baseline interview or to continuing MDI while waiting 6 months for transmission to CSII. The primary outcomes were patient-reported diabetes-specific health-related quality of life (DHRQOL) and diabetes burden of the main caregiver. Secondary outcomes were caregiver stress, fear of hypoglycemia, satisfaction with treatment, and HbA1c.

RESULTS

Two-hundred and eleven patients were randomized between February 2011 and October 2014, and 186 caregivers and 170 patients were analyzed using the intention-to-treat principle for primary outcomes. Children 8 to 11 years in the CSII group reported improved DHRQOL at follow-up compared to MDI (median difference [MD] 9.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.6-16.7, P = 0.004). There were no treatment differences in the adolescent age-group 12 to 16 years (MD 2.7; 95% CI -3.2-9.5; P = 0.353). The main caregivers of the CSII group reported a significant decline of overall diabetes burden at follow-up compared to the MDI group (MD 0; 95% CI -1-0; P = 0.029). Secondary PROs also were in favor of CSII.

CONCLUSIONS

CSII has substantial psychosocial benefits. PROs demonstrate these benefits. Registered as NCT01338922 at clinicaltrials.gov.

摘要

目的

在患有 1 型糖尿病的儿科患者中,连续皮下胰岛素输注(CSII)的应用正在增加。仅从代谢方面来看,无法解释这种应用的增加。从患者的角度来看,CSII 的主要好处可能在于主观的心理社会健康结果(患者报告的结果[PRO])。

受试者和方法

在一项多中心开放性随机对照试验中,年龄在 6 至 16 岁之间的儿童和青少年目前接受多次每日胰岛素注射(MDI)治疗,根据中心进行分层,以 1:1 的比例随机分配,要么在基线访谈后立即开始 CSII,要么继续接受 MDI,等待 6 个月后再转为 CSII。主要结局是患者报告的糖尿病特异性健康相关生活质量(DHRQOL)和主要照顾者的糖尿病负担。次要结局是照顾者的压力、对低血糖的恐惧、对治疗的满意度和 HbA1c。

结果

2011 年 2 月至 2014 年 10 月期间,共随机分配了 211 名患者,共有 186 名照顾者和 170 名患者根据主要结局进行意向治疗分析。CSII 组 8 至 11 岁的儿童在随访时报告 DHRQOL 得到改善,与 MDI 相比(中位数差值[MD]9.5,95%置信区间[CI]3.6-16.7,P=0.004)。在 12 至 16 岁的青少年年龄组中,治疗无差异(MD 2.7;95%CI-3.2-9.5;P=0.353)。CSII 组的主要照顾者报告称,与 MDI 组相比,随访时整体糖尿病负担显著下降(MD 0;95%CI-1-0;P=0.029)。次要 PRO 也有利于 CSII。

结论

CSII 具有显著的心理社会益处。PRO 证明了这些益处。在 clinicaltrials.gov 上注册为 NCT01338922。

相似文献

1
Psychosocial benefits of insulin pump therapy in children with diabetes type 1 and their families: The pumpkin multicenter randomized controlled trial.1 型糖尿病患儿及其家庭应用胰岛素泵治疗的心理社会获益:Pumpkin 多中心随机对照试验。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2018 Dec;19(8):1471-1480. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12777. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
2
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injection regimens in children and young people at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes: pragmatic randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation.初诊 1 型糖尿病患儿和青少年中持续皮下胰岛素输注与多次皮下注射方案的比较:实用随机对照试验和经济评价。
BMJ. 2019 Apr 3;365:l1226. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1226.
3
Quality of life in Danish children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion or multiple daily injections.接受持续皮下胰岛素输注或每日多次注射治疗的丹麦1型糖尿病儿童和青少年的生活质量。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014 Dec;106(3):474-80. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2014.09.028. Epub 2014 Oct 5.
4
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion benefits quality of life in preschool-age children with type 1 diabetes mellitus.持续皮下胰岛素输注对1型糖尿病学龄前儿童的生活质量有益。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2007 Dec;8(6):377-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2007.00283.x.
5
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. A new way to lower risk of severe hypoglycemia, improve metabolic control, and enhance coping in adolescents with type 1 diabetes.持续皮下胰岛素输注。一种降低1型糖尿病青少年严重低血糖风险、改善代谢控制及增强应对能力的新方法。
Diabetes Care. 1999 Nov;22(11):1779-84. doi: 10.2337/diacare.22.11.1779.
6
Clinical Outcome and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of CSII Versus MDI in Children and Adolescent With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus in a Public Health Care System of China.中国公立医疗体系中 CSII 与 MDI 在儿童和青少年 1 型糖尿病患者中的临床结局和成本效益分析。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Mar 30;12:604028. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.604028. eCollection 2021.
7
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion for diabetes: systematic review and economic evaluation.临床有效性和成本效益的连续皮下胰岛素输注治疗糖尿病: 系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Feb;14(11):iii-iv, xi-xvi, 1-181. doi: 10.3310/hta14110.
8
Does insulin pump therapy offer benefits for behaviour, mood, cognition and HbA1c in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes? A randomised controlled trial with observational follow-up.胰岛素泵治疗对 1 型糖尿病儿童和青少年的行为、情绪、认知和 HbA1c 有益吗?一项随机对照试验及观察随访。
Arch Dis Child. 2024 Sep 25;109(10):806-811. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2023-326007.
9
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion therapy: effects on quality of life.持续皮下胰岛素输注治疗:对生活质量的影响。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2007 Aug 25;137(33-34):476-82. doi: 10.4414/smw.2007.11588.
10
Investigation of quality of life and family burden issues during insulin pump therapy in children with Type 1 diabetes mellitus--a large-scale multicentre pilot study.1 型糖尿病患儿胰岛素泵治疗期间生活质量和家庭负担问题的调查——一项大规模多中心试点研究。
Diabet Med. 2009 May;26(5):493-501. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02707.x.

引用本文的文献

1
International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2024: Diabetes Technologies - Insulin Delivery.国际儿童和青少年糖尿病学会2024年临床实践共识指南:糖尿病技术 - 胰岛素输注
Horm Res Paediatr. 2024;97(6):636-662. doi: 10.1159/000543034. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
2
Managing Type 1 Diabetes in an Inpatient Child Psychiatric Care Setting.在儿童住院精神科护理环境中管理1型糖尿病
Diabetes Spectr. 2024 Aug 15;37(3):234-240. doi: 10.2337/dsi24-0008. eCollection 2024 Summer.
3
Humanistic burden of pediatric type 1 diabetes on children and informal caregivers: systematic literature reviews.
1型糖尿病对儿童及非专业照护者的人文负担:系统文献综述
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2024 Mar 21;16(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13098-024-01310-2.
4
Hybrid Closed Loop Systems Improve Glycemic Control and Quality of Life in Historically Minoritized Youth with Diabetes.混合闭环系统改善糖尿病历史少数族裔青年的血糖控制和生活质量。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2024 Mar;26(3):167-175. doi: 10.1089/dia.2023.0450.
5
Insulin Pump Therapy vs Multiple Daily Insulin Injections for Glycemic Control in Children With Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.胰岛素泵治疗与多次每日胰岛素注射对1型糖尿病儿童血糖控制的效果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cureus. 2024 Jan 10;16(1):e52054. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52054. eCollection 2024 Jan.
6
Insulin Pump Utilization in 2017-2021 for More Than 22,000 Children and Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Multicenter Observational Study.2017 - 2021年超过22000名1型糖尿病儿童和成人的胰岛素泵使用情况:一项多中心观察性研究
Clin Diabetes. 2024 Winter;42(1):56-64. doi: 10.2337/cd23-0055. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
7
Diabetes distress in urban Black youth with type 1 diabetes and their caregivers: associations with glycemic control, depression, and health behaviors.城市中黑人青少年 1 型糖尿病患者及其照顾者的糖尿病困扰:与血糖控制、抑郁和健康行为的关联。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2024 Jun 13;49(6):394-404. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsad096.
8
Burden of care and a sense of loneliness in caregivers of children with type 1 diabetes. a cross-sectional study.1型糖尿病患儿照料者的照料负担与孤独感:一项横断面研究。
Biopsychosoc Med. 2023 Oct 6;17(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13030-023-00291-4.
9
Evidence from clinical trials on high-risk medical devices in children: a scoping review.临床研究证据在儿童高风险医疗器械中的应用:范围综述。
Pediatr Res. 2024 Feb;95(3):615-624. doi: 10.1038/s41390-023-02819-4. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
10
Differences in positive expectancy of hybrid closed loop (HCL) insulin delivery systems do not explain racial differences in HCL use.混合闭环(HCL)胰岛素输送系统的积极预期差异并不能解释HCL使用中的种族差异。
J Clin Transl Endocrinol. 2023 May 20;32:100319. doi: 10.1016/j.jcte.2023.100319. eCollection 2023 Jun.