Olawepo John O, Pharr Jennifer R, Kachen Axenya
a School of Community Health Sciences, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health , University of Nevada , Las Vegas , NV , USA.
AIDS Care. 2019 Feb;31(2):153-162. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2018.1533631. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
Social marketing campaigns have been increasingly used in HIV prevention efforts to address barriers to HIV testing. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the social marketing campaigns in the past ten years (2008-2017) that have targeted HIV testing or intent to test as an outcome, and synthesize the results to determine which campaigns work or do not work. The search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and ABI/Inform. The quality assessment tool for quantitative studies developed by the Effective Public Health Practice Project was used to assess study quality. The search generated 373 articles, of which 13 articles met the inclusion criteria. These articles were from 13 distinct campaigns carried out in 9 countries, twelve of which were in high income countries. Sixty-nine percent ( = 9) of the campaigns targeted MSM, gay men, or MSMW, 23% ( = 3) targeted the general population, while 8% ( = 1) focused on African-American women. The study designs for evaluating the campaigns were predominantly cross-sectional, with 4 of the articles combining two or three study designs to evaluate their campaign. Overall, 38% ( = 5) of the campaigns had an increase in HIV testing outcomes, 23% ( = 3) reported no change in HIV testing outcomes, and the remaining 38% ( = 5) of the studies reported mixed outcomes. The results of the quality rating showed that 69% ( = 9) of the papers had weak global ratings, while 31% ( = 4) had moderate rating. None of the articles had a strong rating. This review displayed that social marketing campaigns intended to increase HIV testing uptake were effective in some context. Social marketing practitioners will need to come up with a standardized way of communicating the results of campaign exposure and impact so as to enhance comparison among the multitude of campaigns.
社会营销活动越来越多地被用于艾滋病病毒预防工作中,以消除艾滋病病毒检测的障碍。本综述的目的是评估过去十年(2008 - 2017年)针对艾滋病病毒检测或以检测意愿为结果的社会营销活动,并综合结果以确定哪些活动有效或无效。检索使用了PubMed、Scopus、PsycINFO、EMBASE和ABI/Inform。采用有效公共卫生实践项目开发的定量研究质量评估工具来评估研究质量。检索共产生373篇文章,其中13篇符合纳入标准。这些文章来自9个国家开展的13项不同活动,其中12项在高收入国家。69%(=9)的活动针对男男性行为者、男同性恋者或男男性行为女性,23%(=3)针对普通人群,而8%(=1)关注非裔美国女性。评估这些活动的研究设计主要是横断面研究,其中4篇文章结合了两种或三种研究设计来评估其活动。总体而言,38%(=5)的活动艾滋病病毒检测结果有所增加,23%(=3)报告艾滋病病毒检测结果无变化,其余38%(=5)的研究报告结果不一。质量评级结果显示,69%(=9)的论文全球评级较弱,而31%(=4)评级中等。没有文章获得强评级。本综述表明,旨在提高艾滋病病毒检测接受度的社会营销活动在某些情况下是有效的。社会营销从业者需要想出一种标准化的方式来传达活动曝光和影响的结果,以加强众多活动之间的比较。