• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对于年龄在30至65岁的移位型锁骨中段骨折患者,切开复位钢板内固定术在早期恢复阶段是有益的。

Open reduction and internal fixation with plating is beneficial in the early recovery stage for displaced midshaft clavicular fractures in patients aged 30-65 years old.

作者信息

Chu Jian-Yuan, Yeh Kuang-Ting, Lee Ru-Ping, Yu Tzai-Chiu, Chen Ing-Ho, Peng Cheng-Huan, Liu Kuan-Lin, Wang Jen-Hung, Wu Wen-Tien

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Hualien, Taiwan.

School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.

出版信息

Tzu Chi Med J. 2018 Oct-Dec;30(4):242-246. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_25_18.

DOI:10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_25_18
PMID:30305789
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6172902/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Midshaft clavicular fractures are increasingly treated operatively rather than nonoperatively. Studies have shown mixed results for both types of treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the early-stage functional status associated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with plating and that associated with conservative treatment for displaced midshaft clavicular fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-center retrospective review of the results of 120 cases of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures in patients aged 30-65 years old was conducted. The primary outcome was fracture union status at 6 months. Other outcomes were subjective shoulder value (SSV) scores, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, and radiographic shortening at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. The complication rates in the operative and nonoperative groups were recorded.

RESULTS

The delayed union rate at 6-month postoperatively and VAS scores at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postinjury were significantly higher in the conservative treatment group than in the ORIF group. SSV scores were significantly improved at 6-month postinjury in the ORIF group.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to discuss the importance of early-stage functional restoration after ORIF with plating for displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. This surgery leads to lower pain complications in the earlier stages of bone healing and lower delayed union rates compared with conservative treatment, in patients aged 30-65 years old.

摘要

目的

锁骨中段骨折越来越多地采用手术治疗而非非手术治疗。研究表明,两种治疗方式的结果不一。本研究的目的是比较切开复位钢板内固定术(ORIF)与保守治疗移位型锁骨中段骨折的早期功能状态。

材料与方法

对120例年龄在30 - 65岁的移位型锁骨中段骨折患者的结果进行单中心回顾性研究。主要结局是6个月时的骨折愈合情况。其他结局包括主观肩关节评分(SSV)、视觉模拟评分(VAS)以及伤后6周、3个月和6个月时的影像学缩短情况。记录手术组和非手术组的并发症发生率。

结果

保守治疗组术后6个月的延迟愈合率以及伤后6周、3个月和6个月时的VAS评分均显著高于ORIF组。ORIF组伤后6个月时SSV评分显著改善。

结论

这是第一项探讨切开复位钢板内固定术治疗移位型锁骨中段骨折后早期功能恢复重要性的研究。与保守治疗相比,该手术在30 - 65岁患者的骨愈合早期导致的疼痛并发症更少,延迟愈合率更低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acf6/6172902/f5048d445e2d/TCMJ-30-242-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acf6/6172902/f075716bd27b/TCMJ-30-242-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acf6/6172902/f5048d445e2d/TCMJ-30-242-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acf6/6172902/f075716bd27b/TCMJ-30-242-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acf6/6172902/f5048d445e2d/TCMJ-30-242-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Open reduction and internal fixation with plating is beneficial in the early recovery stage for displaced midshaft clavicular fractures in patients aged 30-65 years old.对于年龄在30至65岁的移位型锁骨中段骨折患者,切开复位钢板内固定术在早期恢复阶段是有益的。
Tzu Chi Med J. 2018 Oct-Dec;30(4):242-246. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_25_18.
2
Open reduction and plate fixation versus nonoperative treatment for displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.切开复位钢板内固定与非手术治疗移位的锁骨中段骨折的多中心随机对照临床试验。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Sep 4;95(17):1576-84. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00307.
3
[Intramedullary stabilisation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: does the fracture pattern (simple vs. complex) influence the anatomic and functional result].[移位型锁骨中段骨折的髓内固定:骨折类型(简单型与复杂型)是否会影响解剖学和功能结果]
Z Orthop Unfall. 2014 Dec;152(6):588-95. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1383206. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
4
Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. Surgical technique.非手术治疗与移位型锁骨中段骨折钢板固定的比较。手术技术。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Mar;90 Suppl 2 Pt 1:1-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01336.
5
Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. A multicenter, randomized clinical trial.非手术治疗与移位型锁骨中段骨折钢板固定的比较:一项多中心随机临床试验
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Jan;89(1):1-10. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00020.
6
Long-term Functional Outcomes and Complications in Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures in Adolescents: A Retrospective Comparative Study.手术与非手术治疗青少年移位锁骨中段骨折的长期功能结果和并发症:一项回顾性对比研究。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2021;41(5):279-283. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001768.
7
Dual Mini-Fragment Plate Fixation of Midshaft Clavicle Fractures Reduces Risk of Reoperation Compared With Single-Plate Fixation Techniques.双微型锁定接骨板固定治疗锁骨中段骨折与单钢板固定技术相比,降低了再次手术的风险。
Am J Sports Med. 2023 Nov;51(13):3393-3400. doi: 10.1177/03635465231203010. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
8
Minimal Pain Decrease Between 2 and 4 Weeks After Nonoperative Management of a Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fracture Is Associated with a High Risk of Symptomatic Nonunion.非手术治疗移位锁骨中段骨折后 2 至 4 周时疼痛轻微减轻与症状性骨不连的高风险相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Jan 1;479(1):129-138. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001411.
9
Plate Fixation Compared with Nonoperative Treatment for Displaced Midshaft Clavicular Fractures: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.钢板固定与非手术治疗移位型锁骨中段骨折的多中心随机对照试验
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Jan 18;99(2):106-112. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01394.
10
Risk factors for complications and reoperation following operative management of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.移位型锁骨中段骨折手术治疗后并发症及再次手术的危险因素。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Oct;31(10):e498-e506. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.03.016. Epub 2022 Apr 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Functional Outcomes of Displaced Midshaft Clavicular Fractures Treated with Precontoured Locked Plates: A Prospective Study.预塑形锁定钢板治疗移位型锁骨中段骨折的功能结局:一项前瞻性研究
F1000Res. 2025 Aug 28;14:374. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.162891.3. eCollection 2025.
2
Functional outcomes and complications of plate fixation for midshaft clavicle fractures by type and location: a systematic review and meta-analysis.按类型和位置分析锁骨中段骨折钢板固定的功能结局及并发症:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
JSES Int. 2024 Feb 8;8(3):407-422. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.01.007. eCollection 2024 May.
3
An evaluation of treatment options for medial, midshaft, and distal clavicle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Plate Fixation Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Displaced Midshaft Clavicular Fractures: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.钢板固定与非手术治疗移位型锁骨中段骨折:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Jun 21;99(12):1051-1057. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01068.
2
Type 2 Diabetes and Metformin Influence on Fracture Healing in an Experimental Rat Model.2型糖尿病与二甲双胍对实验性大鼠模型骨折愈合的影响
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016 Sep-Oct;55(5):955-60. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2016.04.012. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
3
Figure-of-eight bandage versus arm sling for treating middle-third clavicle fractures in adults: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
锁骨中内1/3、中段及远段骨折治疗方案的评估:一项系统评价与Meta分析
JSES Int. 2020 May 4;4(2):256-271. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.01.010. eCollection 2020 Jun.
4
Corrigendum: Open reduction and internal fixation with plating is beneficial in the early recovery stage for displaced midshaft clavicular fractures in patients aged 30-65 years old.勘误:对于30至65岁的移位型锁骨中段骨折患者,切开复位钢板内固定术在早期恢复阶段是有益的。
Tzu Chi Med J. 2018 Oct-Dec;30(4):257. doi: 10.4103/1016-3190.234515.
8字绷带与手臂吊带治疗成人锁骨中段骨折的比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 May 4;17(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1355-8.
4
Prospective randomized study comparing results of fixation for clavicular shaft fractures with intramedullary nail or locking compression plate.比较髓内钉或锁定加压钢板固定锁骨骨干骨折效果的前瞻性随机研究。
Int Orthop. 2017 Jan;41(1):173-179. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3192-5. Epub 2016 May 2.
5
Surgical interventions for treating acute fractures or non-union of the middle third of the clavicle.治疗锁骨中1/3急性骨折或骨不连的手术干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 7;2015(5):CD007428. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007428.pub3.
6
Open reduction and plate fixation versus nonoperative treatment for displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.切开复位钢板内固定与非手术治疗移位的锁骨中段骨折的多中心随机对照临床试验。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Sep 4;95(17):1576-84. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00307.
7
Early versus delayed operative intervention in displaced clavicle fractures.移位锁骨骨折的早期与延迟手术干预。
J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Mar;28(3):119-23. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182a2968e.
8
Operative versus nonoperative care of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.手术与非手术治疗移位型锁骨中段骨折的疗效比较:一项随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Apr 18;94(8):675-84. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01364.
9
Clavicle fractures: a review of the literature and update on treatment.锁骨骨折:文献复习与治疗更新。
Phys Sportsmed. 2011 Sep;39(3):142-50. doi: 10.3810/psm.2011.09.1930.
10
NSAID exposure and risk of nonunion: a meta-analysis of case-control and cohort studies.非甾体抗炎药暴露与骨折不愈合风险:病例对照和队列研究的荟萃分析。
Calcif Tissue Int. 2010 Sep;87(3):193-202. doi: 10.1007/s00223-010-9379-7. Epub 2010 Jun 15.