Martin Molly A, Lee Helen H, Landa Jazmin, Minier Mark, Avenetti David, Sandoval Anna
1Department of Pediatrics, University of Illinois at Chicago, 840 South Wood Street, Chicago, IL 60612 USA.
2Department of Anesthesiology, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1740 West Taylor Street, Suite 3200, Chicago, IL 60612 USA.
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Oct 4;4:155. doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0344-y. eCollection 2018.
The COordinated Oral health Promotion (CO-OP) Chicago trial will test the efficacy of a community health worker (CHW) intervention to improve oral health behaviors for children at high risk for early childhood caries. Before implementing the cluster-randomized controlled trial, we conducted a formative assessment to determine the final design. We used qualitative methods to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the proposed recruitment, data collection, and intervention plan.
Key informant interviews ( = 37) and site observations were conducted at 10 pediatric primary care clinics and 10 Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women Infant and Children (WIC) centers to gain insight from providers and administrators at the locations where recruitment and intervention will occur. Eight focus groups ( = 68) were conducted with caregivers of children to capture the parent perspective. Conceptual coding methods from grounded theory were applied to organize the data into the final themes.
Families, clinics, and WIC centers were all very interested in additional supports for oral health and were enthusiastic about CHWs. Challenges included competing family priorities that might interfere in study enrollment and intervention efficacy. Physical space for enrollment and intervention delivery was a major barrier for some sites. Home visits for data collection and intervention delivery would be unacceptable for some families. These challenges and barriers prompted us to make major changes in our trial design. We opened the option for data collection to occur in multiple locations. We eliminated the home-only arm of the trial. Clinics and WIC centers that are randomized to the non-intervention arm will now have CHWs available at the study conclusion. Finally, we aligned the CHW oral health topics to the needs of families.
We conducted this comprehensive formative assessment to determine the feasibility and acceptability of the CO-OP Chicago trial. While overall acceptance of the trial was high, the results highlighted specific issues with the proposed trial implementation plan and led to several critical design changes. This type of formative work requires a significant upfront investment but we expect it will translate into savings through better recruitment, retention, intervention implementation and adherence, and result dissemination.
芝加哥口腔健康促进协作(CO-OP)试验将测试社区卫生工作者(CHW)干预措施对改善幼儿龋齿高危儿童口腔健康行为的效果。在实施整群随机对照试验之前,我们进行了一项形成性评估以确定最终设计。我们采用定性方法评估拟议的招募、数据收集和干预计划的可行性和可接受性。
在10家儿科初级保健诊所和10个妇女、婴儿和儿童特别补充营养计划(WIC)中心进行了关键信息访谈(n = 37)和现场观察,以便从招募和干预将开展地点的提供者和管理人员那里获取见解。与儿童看护人进行了8个焦点小组访谈(n = 68),以了解家长的观点。应用扎根理论的概念编码方法将数据整理成最终主题。
家庭、诊所和WIC中心都对口腔健康的额外支持非常感兴趣,并对社区卫生工作者充满热情。挑战包括可能干扰研究招募和干预效果的家庭优先事项竞争。招募和干预实施的物理空间对一些地点来说是一个主要障碍。一些家庭不会接受上门进行数据收集和干预。这些挑战和障碍促使我们对试验设计做出重大改变。我们开放了在多个地点进行数据收集的选项。我们取消了试验中仅上门服务的分组。被随机分配到非干预组的诊所和WIC中心在研究结束时将有社区卫生工作者提供服务。最后,我们使社区卫生工作者的口腔健康主题与家庭需求相匹配。
我们进行了这项全面的形成性评估,以确定芝加哥CO-OP试验的可行性和可接受性。虽然试验的总体接受度很高,但结果突出了拟议的试验实施计划中的具体问题,并导致了几项关键的设计变更。这种类型的形成性工作需要大量的前期投入,但我们预计它将通过更好的招募、保留、干预实施和依从性以及结果传播转化为节省成本。