Martin Molly A, Mosnaim Giselle S, Olson Daniel, Swider Susan, Karavolos Kelly, Rothschild Steven
Department of Pediatrics, University of Illinois at Chicago , Chicago, IL , USA .
J Asthma. 2015 Feb;52(1):59-70. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2014.950426. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
Abstract Objective: Puerto Rican children suffer disproportionately from asthma. Project CURA tested the efficacy of a community health worker (CHW) intervention to improve use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and reduce home asthma triggers in Puerto Rican youth in Chicago.
This study employed a behavioral randomized controlled trial design with a community-based participatory research approach. Medications and technique were visually assessed; adherence was determined using dose counters. Home triggers were assessed via self-report, visual inspection and salivary cotinine. All participants received education on core asthma topics and self-management skills. Participants in the CHW arm were offered home education by the CHW in four visits over four months. The attention control arm received four newsletters covering the same topics.
While most of the participants had uncontrolled persistent asthma, <50% had ICS at baseline. In the CHW arms, 67% of participants received the full four-visit intervention. In the Elementary school cohort (n=51), the CHW arm had lower odds of having an ICS (OR=0.2; p=0.02) at 12-months; no differences were seen in other outcomes between arms at any time point. The only significant treatment arm difference in the high school cohort (n=50) was in inhaler technique where the CHW arm performed 18.0% more steps correct at five months (p<0.01) and 14.2% more steps correct at 12 months (p<0.01).
While this CHW intervention did not increase the number of participants with ICS or reduce home asthma triggers, important lessons were learned including challenges to CHW intervention fidelity and the need for CHWs to partner with clinical providers.
摘要 目的:波多黎各儿童哮喘患病率极高。CURA项目测试了社区卫生工作者(CHW)干预措施在改善芝加哥波多黎各青少年吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)使用情况及减少家庭哮喘诱发因素方面的效果。
本研究采用行为随机对照试验设计,并结合基于社区的参与性研究方法。通过视觉评估药物和使用技巧;使用剂量计数器确定依从性。通过自我报告、视觉检查和唾液可替宁评估家庭诱发因素。所有参与者均接受了哮喘核心主题及自我管理技能方面的教育。CHW组的参与者在四个月内接受了CHW四次家访式的家庭教育。注意力控制组收到了涵盖相同主题的四份时事通讯。
虽然大多数参与者患有未得到控制的持续性哮喘,但基线时<50%的人使用ICS。在CHW组中,67%的参与者接受了完整的四次家访干预。在小学队列(n = 51)中,CHW组在12个月时使用ICS的几率较低(OR = 0.2;p = 0.02);在任何时间点,两组在其他结果方面均未观察到差异。在高中队列(n = 50)中,唯一显著的治疗组差异在于吸入器使用技巧,CHW组在五个月时正确步骤多18.0%(p < 0.01),在12个月时正确步骤多14.2%(p < 0.01)。
虽然这种CHW干预措施并未增加使用ICS的参与者数量或减少家庭哮喘诱发因素,但我们吸取了重要经验教训,包括CHW干预保真度面临的挑战以及CHW与临床提供者合作的必要性。