De Almeida L K S, Pletschke B I, Frost C L
1Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Rhodes University, P.O. Box 94, Grahamstown, 6140 South Africa.
2Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Nelson Mandela University, P.O. Box 77000, Port Elizabeth, 6031 South Africa.
3 Biotech. 2018 Oct;8(10):438. doi: 10.1007/s13205-018-1464-z. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
In vitro studies were conducted to determine the short-term cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of pure glyphosate and two glyphosate formulations (Roundup and Wipeout) at concentrations relevant to human exposure using whole blood (cytotoxicity) and various cancer cell lines (cytotoxicity and genotoxicity). Pure glyphosate (pure glyph) and Roundup (Ro) showed similar non-monotonic toxicological profiles at low dose exposure (from 10 µg/ml), whereas Wipeout (Wo) demonstrated a monotonic reduction in cell viability from a threshold concentration of 50 µg/ml, when tested in whole blood. We evaluated whether using various cancer cells (the estrogen-E2-responsive HEC1A, MCF7 and the estrogen-insensitive MDA-MB-231) exposed to moderate doses (75-500 µg/ml) would indicate varied toxicity and results indicated significant effects in the HEC1A cancer cells. A non-monotonic reduction in cell viability was observed in HEC1A exposed to pure glyph (75-500 µg/ml) and proliferative effects were observed after exposure to Wo (75, 125 and 250 µg/ml). Genotoxicity assessment (test concentration 500 µg/ml) demonstrated DNA damage in the HEC1A and MDA-MB-231 cells. Adjuvants and/or glyphosate impurities were potential contributing factors of toxicity based on the differential toxicities displayed by Ro and Wo in human whole blood and the HEC1A cells. This study contributes to the existing knowledge about in vitro exposure to moderate concentrations of glyphosate or glyphosate formulations at cytotoxic and genotoxic levels. In addition, a suggestion on the relevance of the estrogen receptor status of the cell lines used is provided, leading to the need to further investigate a potential endocrine disruptive role.
进行了体外研究,以确定纯草甘膦和两种草甘膦制剂(农达和灭草剂)在与人类接触相关的浓度下,使用全血(细胞毒性)和各种癌细胞系(细胞毒性和遗传毒性)的短期细胞毒性和遗传毒性作用。纯草甘膦(纯草甘)和农达(Ro)在低剂量暴露(从10μg/ml起)时显示出相似的非单调毒理学特征,而灭草剂(Wo)在全血测试中,从阈值浓度50μg/ml起细胞活力呈单调下降。我们评估了使用暴露于中等剂量(75 - 500μg/ml)的各种癌细胞(雌激素-E2反应性的HEC1A、MCF7和雌激素不敏感的MDA-MB-231)是否会显示出不同的毒性,结果表明在HEC1A癌细胞中有显著影响。在暴露于纯草甘(75 - 500μg/ml)的HEC1A中观察到细胞活力的非单调下降,并且在暴露于灭草剂(75、125和250μg/ml)后观察到增殖效应。遗传毒性评估(测试浓度500μg/ml)显示HEC1A和MDA-MB-231细胞中有DNA损伤。基于Ro和Wo在人全血和HEC1A细胞中显示的不同毒性,佐剂和/或草甘膦杂质是毒性的潜在促成因素。本研究有助于增加关于体外暴露于中等浓度草甘膦或草甘膦制剂时细胞毒性和遗传毒性水平的现有知识。此外,还提供了关于所用细胞系雌激素受体状态相关性的建议,从而有必要进一步研究潜在的内分泌干扰作用。