Department of Cardiology, Medical University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
HCR (Heidelberg Center for Heart Rhythm Disorders), Heidelberg, Germany.
Clin Res Cardiol. 2019 Jun;108(6):577-599. doi: 10.1007/s00392-018-1377-1. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
Cardiac arrhythmias remain a common challenge and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Effective and safe rhythm control strategies are a primary, yet unmet need in everyday clinical practice. Despite significant pharmacological and technological advances, including catheter ablation and device-based therapies, the development of more effective alternatives is of significant interest to increase quality of life and to reduce symptom burden, hospitalizations and mortality. The mechanistic understanding of pathophysiological pathways underlying cardiac arrhythmias has advanced profoundly, opening up novel avenues for mechanism-based therapeutic approaches. Current management of arrhythmias, however, is primarily guided by clinical and demographic characteristics of patient groups as opposed to individual, patient-specific mechanisms and pheno-/genotyping. With this state-of-the-art paper, the Working Group on Cellular Electrophysiology of the German Cardiac Society aims to close the gap between advanced molecular understanding and clinical decision-making in cardiac electrophysiology. The significance of cellular electrophysiological findings for clinical arrhythmia management constitutes the main focus of this document. Clinically relevant knowledge of pathophysiological pathways of arrhythmias and cellular mechanisms of antiarrhythmic interventions are summarized. Furthermore, the specific molecular background for the initiation and perpetuation of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias and mechanism-based strategies for therapeutic interventions are highlighted. Current "hot topics" in atrial fibrillation are critically appraised. Finally, the establishment and support of cellular and translational electrophysiology programs in clinical rhythmology departments is called for to improve basic-science-guided patient management.
心律失常仍然是一个常见的挑战,与显著的发病率和死亡率相关。有效的和安全的节律控制策略是日常临床实践中的主要但未满足的需求。尽管在药理学和技术方面取得了重大进展,包括导管消融和基于器械的治疗,但开发更有效的替代方法对于提高生活质量、减轻症状负担、减少住院和死亡率非常重要。心脏心律失常病理生理途径的机制理解已经有了很大的进展,为基于机制的治疗方法开辟了新的途径。然而,目前心律失常的治疗主要是根据患者群体的临床和人口统计学特征来指导,而不是根据个体、患者特异性机制和表型/基因型来指导。德国心脏病学会细胞电生理学工作组发表了这篇最新论文,旨在弥合先进的分子理解与心脏电生理学临床决策之间的差距。本文主要关注细胞电生理学发现对临床心律失常管理的重要性。总结了心律失常病理生理途径和抗心律失常干预的细胞机制的临床相关知识。此外,还强调了心房和心室心律失常的起始和持续的特定分子背景,以及基于机制的治疗干预策略。本文对心房颤动的当前“热点话题”进行了批判性评估。最后,呼吁在临床心律失常学部门建立和支持细胞和转化电生理学项目,以改善基于基础科学的患者管理。