Zeng JianPing, Qin LiPing, Wang DuanBu, Gong JiangBiao, Pan JianWei, Zhu Yu, Sun TianFu, Xu KangLi, Zhan RenYa
Department of Neurosurgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People's Republic of China.
Institute of Aging Research, School of Medicine, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People's Republic of China.
World Neurosurg. 2019 Jan;121:e731-e738. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.09.207. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the risk of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus among patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with either coil placement or clipping.
A systematic literature search of Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was performed to confirm relevant studies. The scientific literature was screened in accordance with the predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. After quality assessment and data extraction from the eligible studies, a meta-analysis was conducted using the STATA 12.0 software (Stata corporation, College Station, Texas, USA).
Thirteen studies met all inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. In total, these studies included 13,751 patients. Of the patients, 8444 of them underwent neurosurgical clipping, and 5307 underwent endovascular coiling. The overall result of a pooled estimate revealed there was no statistically significant risk of shunt dependency difference between the clipping and coiling groups (11.4% vs. 12.0%, respectively; relative risk [RR], 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84-1.01). Six prospective studies (n = 1373) reported shunt-dependent hydrocephalus revealed no significant difference between clipping and coiling (23.3% vs. 20.1%, respectively; RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.91-1.38). Seven retrospective studies (n = 12,378) reported shunt-dependent hydrocephalus found statistical significance between the surgical and endovascular treatment groups (10.0% vs. 11.1%, respectively; RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.79-0.98).
Microsurgical clipping and endovascular coiling of ruptured cerebral aneurysms are associated with similar incidences of ventricular shunt placement for hydrocephalus. The risk of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus is not higher after coiling than after clipping of ruptured intracranial aneurysms.
本荟萃分析旨在评估颅内动脉瘤破裂患者接受弹簧圈栓塞或夹闭治疗后发生分流依赖型脑积水的风险。
对Embase、PubMed、Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆进行系统文献检索,以确认相关研究。按照预先设定的纳入和排除标准对科学文献进行筛选。在对符合条件的研究进行质量评估和数据提取后,使用STATA 12.0软件(美国德克萨斯州大学城Stata公司)进行荟萃分析。
13项研究符合所有纳入标准并纳入分析。这些研究共纳入13751例患者。其中,8444例接受了神经外科夹闭,5307例接受了血管内栓塞。汇总估计的总体结果显示,夹闭组和栓塞组之间分流依赖风险无统计学显著差异(分别为11.4%和12.0%;相对风险[RR],0.92;95%置信区间[CI],0.84 - 1.01)。六项前瞻性研究(n = 1373)报告的分流依赖型脑积水显示夹闭和栓塞之间无显著差异(分别为23.3%和20.1%;RR,1.12;95% CI,0.91 - 1.38)。七项回顾性研究(n = 12378)报告的分流依赖型脑积水发现手术治疗组和血管内治疗组之间有统计学差异(分别为10.0%和11.1%;RR,0.88;95% CI,0.79 - 0.98)。
破裂脑动脉瘤的显微外科夹闭和血管内栓塞与脑积水脑室分流置入的发生率相似。颅内动脉瘤破裂后,弹簧圈栓塞后分流依赖型脑积水的风险并不高于夹闭术后。