Clipping versus Coiling for Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND

The treatment strategies of ruptured intracranial aneurysms (RIAs) include surgical clipping and endovascular coiling, and the efficacy and safety of clipping versus coiling are yet controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the available randomized controlled trials to determine the optimal treatment method for patients with RIA.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials published up to September 5, 2017. The summary analysis was performed using a random-effects model. The primary outcomes included poor outcome, mortality, and rebleeding, whereas the secondary outcomes included complete occlusion, incomplete occlusion, severe disability, and vegetative state.

RESULTS

We identified 5 trials with data collected from 2883 patients. The summary results indicated that surgical clipping in patients was associated with a high incidence of poor outcome (relative risk [RR], 1.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-1.51; P < 0.001), whereas no significant effect was observed on mortality (RR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.79-1.49; P = 0.608) and rebleeding (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.20-2.06; P = 0.460) compared with endovascular coiling. Furthermore, we noted that surgical clipping significantly increased the incidence of complete occlusion compared with endovascular coiling (RR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.09 1.55; P = 0.004). Conversely, surgical clipping was associated with a low incidence of incomplete occlusion (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.45-0.99; P = 0.044). No significant differences were noted between surgical clipping and endovascular coiling with respect to the outcomes of severe disability (RR, 1.39; 95% CI, 0.90-2.16; P = 0.140) and vegetative state (RR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.84-2.17; P = 0.213).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis provides moderate evidence that surgical clipping has few benefits than endovascular coiling for the treatment of RIA.