Movement Science Group, School of Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.
Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Eur J Neurol. 2019 Mar;26(3):435-441. doi: 10.1111/ene.13833. Epub 2018 Nov 25.
The aim was to evaluate the tolerability of, adherence to and efficacy of a community walking training programme with simultaneous cognitive demand (dual-task) compared to a control walking training programme without cognitive distraction.
Adult stroke survivors at least 6 months after stroke with a visibly obvious gait abnormality or reduced 2-min walk distance were included in a two-arm parallel randomized controlled trial of complex intervention with blinded assessments. Participants received a 10 week, bi-weekly, 30 min treadmill programme at an aerobic training intensity (55%-85% heart rate maximum), either with or without simultaneous cognitive demands. Outcome was measured at 0, 11 and 22 weeks. The primary assessment involved 2-min walk tests with and without cognitive distraction to investigate the dual-task effect on walking and cognition; secondary results were the Short Form Health Survey 36, EuroQol-5D-5L, the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) and step activity.
Fifty stroke patients were included; 43 received allocated training and 45 completed all assessments. The experimental group (n = 26) increased their mean (SD) 2-min walking distance from 90.7 (8.2) to 103.5 (8.2) m, compared with 86.7 (8.5) to 92.8 (8.6) m in the control group, and their PASE score from 74.3 (9.1) to 89.9 (9.4), compared with 94.7 (9.4) to 77.3 (9.9) in the control group. Statistically, only the change in the PASE differed between the groups (P = 0.029), with the dual-task group improving more. There were no differences in other measures.
Walking with specific additional cognitive distraction (dual-task training) might increase activity more over 12 weeks, but the data are not conclusive.
本研究旨在评估同时具有认知需求的社区步行训练计划(双重任务)的耐受性、依从性和疗效,与不进行认知分散的对照步行训练计划进行比较。
本研究纳入了至少在卒中后 6 个月且存在明显步态异常或 2 分钟步行距离缩短的成年卒中幸存者,采用盲法评估的两臂平行随机对照试验对复杂干预措施进行了研究。参与者接受了 10 周、每两周进行一次、每次 30 分钟的跑步机训练,强度为有氧训练(心率最大值的 55%-85%),或同时进行或不进行认知需求。在 0、11 和 22 周时进行了评估。主要评估包括在有或无认知分散的情况下进行 2 分钟步行测试,以研究步行和认知的双重任务效应;次要结果是使用短格式健康调查 36 量表、欧洲五维健康量表 5 维度 5 级量表、老年人身体活动量表(PASE)和步数活动进行评估。
共有 50 名卒中患者入选,其中 43 名患者接受了分配的训练,45 名患者完成了所有评估。实验组(n=26)的 2 分钟步行距离从 90.7(8.2)m 增加到 103.5(8.2)m,对照组则从 86.7(8.5)m 增加到 92.8(8.6)m,实验组的 PASE 评分从 74.3(9.1)增加到 89.9(9.4),对照组则从 94.7(9.4)增加到 77.3(9.9)。统计学上,仅 PASE 评分的变化在两组之间存在差异(P=0.029),双重任务组的改善更为明显。其他测量指标无差异。
在 12 周内,进行具有特定认知分散的步行训练(双重任务训练)可能会增加更多的活动量,但数据尚无定论。