Mayer Jamie F, Sandberg Chaleece W, Mozeiko Jennifer, Madden Elizabeth B, Murray Laura L
School of Allied Health and Communicative Disorders, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL, United States.
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Penn State University, University Park, PA, United States.
Front Rehabil Sci. 2021 Dec 24;2:785312. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2021.785312. eCollection 2021.
This systematic review aimed to determine how aerobic exercise affects cognition after stroke, with particular focus on aphasia and language improvement. Methodological quality was assessed with the PEDro+ scale with half of the 27 included studies rated as high quality. Data extraction focused on cognitive effects of aerobic exercise post-stroke, intervention characteristics, outcome measures, and participant characteristics. Whereas attention, memory, and executive functioning measures were common across the included studies, no study included a language-specific, performance-based measure. Seventeen studies reported positive cognitive effects, most frequently in the domains of attention, memory and executive functioning. Variability in outcome measures, intervention characteristics, and participant characteristics made it difficult to identify similarities among studies reporting positive cognitive effects of exercise or among those studies reporting null outcomes. Only three studies provided specific information about the number of individuals with aphasia included or excluded, who comprise approximately one-third of the stroke population. The review identified patent gaps in our understanding of how aerobic exercise may affect not only the cognitive domain of language post-stroke but also the broader cognitive functioning of individuals with post-stroke aphasia. Methodological limitations of the reviewed studies also warrant further examination of the direct impact of aerobic exercise on cognition post-stroke with careful attention to the selection and reporting of population, intervention, and outcomes.
本系统评价旨在确定有氧运动如何影响中风后的认知,尤其关注失语症和语言改善情况。采用PEDro+量表评估方法学质量,纳入的27项研究中有一半被评为高质量。数据提取聚焦于中风后有氧运动的认知效应、干预特征、结局指标和参与者特征。虽然纳入的研究中注意力、记忆和执行功能测量较为常见,但没有一项研究纳入基于表现的特定语言测量。17项研究报告了积极的认知效应,最常见于注意力、记忆和执行功能领域。结局指标、干预特征和参与者特征的差异使得难以确定报告运动积极认知效应的研究之间或报告无效应结果的研究之间的相似之处。只有三项研究提供了关于纳入或排除的失语症个体数量的具体信息,这些个体约占中风人群的三分之一。该评价发现了我们在理解有氧运动如何不仅影响中风后语言的认知领域,而且影响中风后失语症个体更广泛的认知功能方面存在明显差距。所审查研究的方法学局限性也需要进一步研究有氧运动对中风后认知的直接影响,同时要特别注意人群、干预和结局的选择及报告。