Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1097:295-319. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-96445-4_16.
Despite more than 80 years of animal experiments and clinical practice, efficacy of hypothermia in improving treatment outcomes in patients suffering from cell and tissue damage caused by ischemia is still ongoing. This review will first describe the history of utilizing cooling in medical treatment, followed by chemical and biochemical mechanisms of cooling that can lead to neuroprotection often observed in animal studies and some clinical studies. The next sections will be focused on current cooling approaches/devices, as well as cooling parameters recommended by researchers and clinicians. Animal and clinical studies of implementing hypothermia to spinal cord and brain tissue injury patients are presented next. This section will review the latest outcomes of hypothermia in treating patients suffering from traumatic brain injury (TBI), spinal cord injury (SCI), stroke, cardiopulmonary surgery, and cardiac arrest, followed by a summary of available evidence regarding both demonstrated neuroprotection and potential risks of hypothermia. Contributions from bioengineers to the field of hypothermia in medical treatment will be discussed in the last section of this review. Overall, an accumulating body of clinical evidence along with several decades of animal research and mathematical simulations has documented that the efficacy of hypothermia is dependent on achieving a reduced temperature in the target tissue before or soon after the injury-precipitating event. Mild hypothermia with temperature reduction of several degrees Celsius is as effective as modest or deep hypothermia in providing therapeutic benefit without introducing collateral/systemic complications. It is widely demonstrated that the rewarming rate must be controlled to be lower than 0.5 °C/h to avoid mismatch between local blood perfusion and metabolism. In the past several decades, many different cooling methods and devices have been designed, tested, and used in medical treatments with mixed results. Accurately designing treatment protocols to achieve specific cooling outcomes requires collaboration among engineers, researchers, and clinicians. Although this problem is quite challenging, it presents a major opportunity for bioengineers to create methods and devices that quickly and safely produce hypothermia in targeted tissue regions without interfering with routine medical treatment.
尽管已经进行了 80 多年的动物实验和临床实践,但低温在改善因缺血导致的细胞和组织损伤患者治疗效果方面的疗效仍在研究中。本综述首先描述了在医学治疗中利用冷却的历史,然后描述了化学和生化冷却机制,这些机制通常可以在动物研究和一些临床研究中观察到神经保护作用。接下来的部分将集中讨论当前的冷却方法/设备,以及研究人员和临床医生推荐的冷却参数。接下来介绍在脊髓和脑组织损伤患者中实施低温的动物和临床研究。这一节将回顾低温治疗创伤性脑损伤(TBI)、脊髓损伤(SCI)、中风、心肺手术和心脏骤停患者的最新结果,然后总结有关低温神经保护作用和潜在风险的现有证据。在本综述的最后一节中,将讨论生物工程师对医学低温治疗领域的贡献。总的来说,越来越多的临床证据以及几十年来的动物研究和数学模拟表明,低温的疗效取决于在损伤诱发事件之前或之后尽快在目标组织中实现降低的温度。与适度或深度低温相比,几度的轻度低温在提供治疗益处而不引入并发症/全身并发症方面同样有效。广泛证明,为了避免局部血液灌注和代谢之间的不匹配,复温率必须控制在 0.5°C/h 以下。在过去几十年中,已经设计、测试和使用了许多不同的冷却方法和设备,但结果喜忧参半。准确设计治疗方案以实现特定的冷却效果需要工程师、研究人员和临床医生之间的合作。尽管这个问题非常具有挑战性,但它为生物工程师提供了一个重大机会,可以创建方法和设备,以便在不干扰常规医疗治疗的情况下快速、安全地在目标组织区域产生低温。