Suppr超能文献

坦桑尼亚将非国家提供者签约提供初级保健服务:利益攸关方的看法。

Contracting Out Non-State Providers to Provide Primary Healthcare Services in Tanzania: Perceptions of Stakeholders.

机构信息

Institute of Development Studies, University of Dar es Salaam, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

出版信息

Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Oct 1;7(10):910-918. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.46.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the attempt to move towards universal health coverage (UHC), many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are actively seeking to contract-out non-state providers (NSPs) to deliver health services to a specified population. Research on contracting-out has focused more on the impact of contracting-out than on the actual processes underlying the intervention and contextual factors that influence its performance. This paper reports on perceptions of stakeholders on contracting-out faith-based hospitals through service agreements (SAs) to provide primary healthcare services in Tanzania.

METHODS

We adopted a qualitative descriptive case study design. Qualitative research tools included document review and in-depth interviews with key informants, and data were analysed using a thematic approach.

RESULTS

Stakeholders reported mixed perceptions on the SA. The government considered the SA as an important mechanism for improving access to primary healthcare services where there were no public hospitals. The faith-based hospitals viewed the SA as a means of overcoming serious budget and human resource constraints as a result of the tightening funding environment. However, constant delays in disbursement of funds, mistrust among partners, and ineffective contract enforcement mechanisms resulted into negative perceptions of the SA.

CONCLUSION

SAs between local governments and faith-based hospitals were perceived to be important by both parties. However, in order to implement SAs effectively, the districts should diversify the sources of financing the contracts. In addition, the government and the faith-based organizations should continually engage in dialogue so as to build more trust between the partners involved in the SA. Furthermore, the central government needs to play a greater role in building the capacity of district and regional level actors in monitoring the implementation of the SA.

摘要

背景

在努力实现全民健康覆盖(UHC)的过程中,许多低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)积极寻求将非国家提供者(NSPs)外包出去,以向特定人群提供卫生服务。关于外包的研究更多地关注外包的影响,而不是干预背后的实际过程和影响其绩效的背景因素。本文报告了坦桑尼亚通过服务协议(SA)将信仰为基础的医院外包出去以提供初级卫生保健服务的利益相关者的看法。

方法

我们采用了定性描述性案例研究设计。定性研究工具包括文件审查和对主要利益攸关方的深入访谈,数据采用主题分析方法进行分析。

结果

利益攸关方对 SA 有不同的看法。政府认为 SA 是改善没有公立医院的地区获得初级卫生保健服务的重要机制。信仰为基础的医院认为 SA 是克服因资金环境收紧而导致的严重预算和人力资源限制的一种手段。然而,资金发放的不断延迟、合作伙伴之间的不信任以及合同执行机制的无效,导致对 SA 的负面看法。

结论

地方政府和信仰为基础的医院之间的 SA 被双方认为是重要的。然而,为了有效地实施 SA,地区应多样化合同的融资来源。此外,政府和信仰组织应不断进行对话,以建立 SA 中涉及的合作伙伴之间更多的信任。此外,中央政府需要在加强地区和区域一级行为体的能力方面发挥更大的作用,以监测 SA 的执行情况。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

6
Contracting out health services in fragile states.在脆弱国家外包医疗服务。
BMJ. 2006 Mar 25;332(7543):718-21. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7543.718.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验