• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对于移植肾功能延迟和缓慢的肾移植受者,延迟使用他克莫司是安全有效的。

Delayed Initiation of Tacrolimus Is Safe and Effective in Renal Transplant Recipients With Delayed and Slow Graft Function.

作者信息

Liu Y, Liu H, Shen Y, Chen Y, Cheng Y

机构信息

Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

出版信息

Transplant Proc. 2018 Oct;50(8):2368-2370. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.03.101. Epub 2018 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.03.101
PMID:30316359
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus is widely used in renal transplantation to help prevent acute and chronic rejection, but the nephrotoxicity of tacrolimus may compromise renal function. This study investigates the safety and efficacy in delayed initiation of tacrolimus after antilymphocyte induction therapy in kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort analysis involved data from 68 kidney transplant recipients receiving standard induction therapy (basiliximab [Simulect] or thymoglobulin) combined with tacrolimus. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether the start time of tacrolimus therapy was before or after 24 hours posttransplantation. Acute rejection, common complications of immunosuppression, and graft survival were compared.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) timing of tacrolimus administered in the Delayed group was 4 (1.9) days after transplantation. The Delayed group patients had a higher percentage of slow graft function and delayed graft function than the No-delay group. Compared with the No-delay group, delayed initiation of tacrolimus did not increase risk of biopsy-proven acute rejection, infection, posttransplant diabetes mellitus, graft survival, and patient survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirmed delayed initiation of tacrolimus after antilymphocyte induction therapy is safe and effective in renal transplant recipients with slow or delayed graft function.

摘要

背景

他克莫司广泛用于肾移植以预防急性和慢性排斥反应,但他克莫司的肾毒性可能损害肾功能。本研究调查了肾移植受者在抗淋巴细胞诱导治疗后延迟启动他克莫司的安全性和有效性。

方法

这项回顾性队列分析涉及68例接受标准诱导治疗(巴利昔单抗[舒莱]或抗胸腺细胞球蛋白)联合他克莫司的肾移植受者的数据。根据他克莫司治疗开始时间是在移植后24小时之前还是之后,将患者分为两组。比较急性排斥反应、免疫抑制常见并发症和移植物存活率。

结果

延迟组他克莫司给药的平均(标准差)时间为移植后4(1.9)天。延迟组患者缓慢移植肾功能和延迟移植肾功能的比例高于无延迟组。与无延迟组相比,延迟启动他克莫司并未增加活检证实的急性排斥反应、感染、移植后糖尿病、移植物存活率和患者存活率的风险。

结论

我们的研究证实,在具有缓慢或延迟移植肾功能的肾移植受者中,抗淋巴细胞诱导治疗后延迟启动他克莫司是安全有效的。

相似文献

1
Delayed Initiation of Tacrolimus Is Safe and Effective in Renal Transplant Recipients With Delayed and Slow Graft Function.对于移植肾功能延迟和缓慢的肾移植受者,延迟使用他克莫司是安全有效的。
Transplant Proc. 2018 Oct;50(8):2368-2370. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.03.101. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
2
Induction Therapy in Elderly Kidney Transplant Recipients With Low Immunological Risk.老年低免疫风险肾移植受者的诱导治疗。
Transplantation. 2020 Mar;104(3):613-622. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002804.
3
Efficacy and safety of thymoglobulin and basiliximab in kidney transplant patients at high risk for acute rejection and delayed graft function.胸腺球蛋白和巴利昔单抗在急性排斥反应和移植肾功能延迟高风险肾移植患者中的疗效与安全性。
Exp Clin Transplant. 2013 Aug;11(4):310-4. doi: 10.6002/ect.2012.0103. Epub 2012 Nov 1.
4
Comparison of single bolus ATG and Basiliximab as induction therapy in presensitized renal allograft recipients receiving tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen.在接受以他克莫司为基础的免疫抑制方案的致敏肾移植受者中,单次大剂量抗胸腺细胞球蛋白与巴利昔单抗作为诱导治疗的比较。
Transpl Immunol. 2008 Jan;18(3):281-5. doi: 10.1016/j.trim.2007.08.002. Epub 2007 Aug 28.
5
Usefulness of Delayed Introduction of Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplants Using Type-III Donors After Circulatory Death.心脏死亡后使用III型供体的肾移植中延迟引入他克莫司的效用
Transplant Proc. 2019 Mar;51(2):337-340. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.10.022. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
6
Low-dose Thymoglobulin vs Basiliximab Induction Therapy in Low-Risk Living Related Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Prospective Randomized Trial.低剂量他克莫司与巴利昔单抗诱导治疗低危亲属活体肾移植受者:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Transplant Proc. 2021 Apr;53(3):1005-1009. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.01.054. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
7
Effects of Antithymocyte Globulin, Basiliximab, and Induction-Free Treatment in Living Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients on Tacrolimus-Based Immunosuppression.抗胸腺细胞球蛋白、巴利昔单抗和诱导治疗在活体供肾移植受者中对基于他克莫司的免疫抑制的影响。
Exp Clin Transplant. 2024 Apr;22(4):270-276. doi: 10.6002/ect.2023.0010.
8
Induction Therapy With ATG Compared With Anti-IL2 Basiliximab in Low-Immunologic Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients.低免疫风险肾移植受者中抗胸腺细胞球蛋白诱导治疗与抗白细胞介素-2巴利昔单抗的比较
Transplant Proc. 2019 Dec;51(10):3259-3264. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.07.026. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
9
Immunological risk stratification and tailored minimisation of immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients.肾移植受者的免疫风险分层及免疫抑制的个体化最小化
BMC Nephrol. 2020 Mar 11;21(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12882-020-01739-3.
10
Evaluating safety and efficacy of rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction in elderly kidney transplant recipients.评估兔抗胸腺细胞球蛋白诱导疗法在老年肾移植受者中的安全性和有效性。
Exp Clin Transplant. 2013 Jun;11(3):222-8. doi: 10.6002/ect.2012.0211. Epub 2013 Feb 22.

引用本文的文献

1
AI-Driven Tacrolimus Dosing in Transplant Care: Cohort Study.移植护理中人工智能驱动的他克莫司给药:队列研究
JMIR AI. 2025 Sep 2;4:e67302. doi: 10.2196/67302.
2
Clinically available immunosuppression averts rejection but not systemic inflammation after porcine islet xenotransplant in cynomolgus macaques.在食蟹猕猴中进行猪胰岛异种移植后,临床可用的免疫抑制可避免排斥反应,但无法消除全身炎症。
Am J Transplant. 2022 Mar;22(3):745-760. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16876. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
3
A Comparative Analysis of Once-daily and Twice-daily Formulation of Tacrolimus in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients.
他克莫司每日一次和每日两次剂型在初发肾移植受者中的比较分析
Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2021 Mar 17;55(1):62-67. doi: 10.14744/SEMB.2020.71235. eCollection 2021.