Strijk S P, Boetes C, Rosenbusch G, Ruijs J H
Rofo. 1987 Mar;146(3):312-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1048489.
Lymphography and abdominal CT were performed in 78 patients staged for Hodgkin's disease. In 82% of all patients, both examinations agreed on the presence or absence of lymph node involvement. In the group of 39 patients undergoing lymphography prior to CT, the agreement was 90%. In the group of 39 patients with lymphography following CT, the agreement was 74%. In 50% of the patients with discrepant findings, lymphography revealed abnormal nodes compared with CT. Lymphography was abnormal in 26% of patients with a normal CT scan as the first examination, and in 9% of patients with a normal CT scan as the second examination. It is concluded that lymphography is more reliable than CT in the examination of the abdomen. CT performed after a normal or an abnormal lymphogram adds little additional information. When CT is preferred as the initial investigation in staging Hodgkin's disease, lymphography only adds significant information if the CT scan is normal or equivocal.
对78例霍奇金病分期患者进行了淋巴造影和腹部CT检查。在所有患者中,82%的两种检查结果在有无淋巴结受累方面一致。在CT检查前进行淋巴造影的39例患者中,一致性为90%。在CT检查后进行淋巴造影的39例患者中,一致性为74%。在检查结果不一致的患者中,50%的淋巴造影显示与CT相比有异常淋巴结。在首次检查CT扫描正常的患者中,26%的淋巴造影异常;在第二次检查CT扫描正常的患者中,9%的淋巴造影异常。得出结论,在腹部检查中,淋巴造影比CT更可靠。在正常或异常淋巴造影后进行CT检查几乎不会增加额外信息。当首选CT作为霍奇金病分期的初始检查时,只有在CT扫描正常或不明确时,淋巴造影才会增加重要信息。