• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多维临终关怀方法:福利模式。

Multi-dimensional approach to end-of-life care: The Welfare Model.

机构信息

National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Nurs Ethics. 2019 Nov-Dec;26(7-8):1955-1967. doi: 10.1177/0969733018806705. Epub 2018 Oct 14.

DOI:10.1177/0969733018806705
PMID:30318993
Abstract

Appropriate and balanced decision-making is sentinel to goal setting and the provision of appropriate clinical care that are attuned to preserving the best interests of the patient. Current family-led decision-making in family-centric societies such as those in Singapore and other countries in East Asia are believed to compromise these objectives in favor of protecting familial interests. Redressing these skewed clinical practices employing autonomy-based patient-centric approaches however have been found wanting in their failure to contend with wider sociocultural considerations that impact care determinations. Evaluation of a number of alternative decision-making frameworks set out to address the shortcomings of prevailing atomistic and family-centric decision-making models within the confines of end-of-life care prove these alternative frameworks to be little better at protecting the best interests of vulnerable patients. As a result, we propose the Welfare Model that we believe is attentive to the relevant socio-culturally significant considerations of a particular case and better meets the needs of end-of-life care goals of preserving the welfare of patients. Employing a multi-professional team evaluation guided by regnant psychosocial, legal, and clinical standards and the prevailing practical and clinical realities of the particular patient's setting the Welfare Model provides a clinically relevant, culturally sensitive, transparent, and evidence-based approach to care determinations.

摘要

恰当和平衡的决策对于目标设定和提供适当的临床护理至关重要,这有助于维护患者的最佳利益。在新加坡和东亚其他国家等以家庭为中心的社会中,目前以家庭为主导的决策被认为是以牺牲保护家庭利益为代价来实现这些目标的。然而,采用以自主为基础的以患者为中心的方法来纠正这些有偏差的临床实践,已经被发现无法应对影响护理决策的更广泛的社会文化因素。评估了一些替代决策框架,旨在解决生命末期护理中普遍存在的原子论和以家庭为中心的决策模型的缺陷,这些替代框架在保护弱势患者的最佳利益方面并没有更好的效果。因此,我们提出了福利模型,我们认为该模型关注特定情况下相关的社会文化重要因素,并更好地满足了生命末期护理的目标,即保护患者的福利。该模型采用多专业团队评估,以占主导地位的心理社会、法律和临床标准以及特定患者环境中的现行实际和临床现实为指导,为护理决策提供了一种具有临床相关性、文化敏感性、透明度和循证的方法。

相似文献

1
Multi-dimensional approach to end-of-life care: The Welfare Model.多维临终关怀方法:福利模式。
Nurs Ethics. 2019 Nov-Dec;26(7-8):1955-1967. doi: 10.1177/0969733018806705. Epub 2018 Oct 14.
2
Limits to relational autonomy--the Singaporean experience.关系自主性的局限——新加坡的经验
Nurs Ethics. 2015 May;22(3):331-40. doi: 10.1177/0969733014533239. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
3
Navigating complex end-of-life decisions in a family-centric society.在以家庭为中心的社会中应对复杂的临终决策。
Nurs Ethics. 2020 Jun;27(4):1003-1011. doi: 10.1177/0969733019876304. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
4
The influence of the family in conceptions of personhood in the palliative care setting in Singapore and its influence upon decision making.家庭对新加坡姑息治疗环境中人格观念的影响及其对决策的影响。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2014 Sep;31(6):645-54. doi: 10.1177/1049909113500136. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
5
Applying the welfare model to at-own-risk discharges.将福利模式应用于自担风险出院。
Nurs Ethics. 2017 Aug;24(5):525-537. doi: 10.1177/0969733015617340. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
6
Understanding the fluid nature of personhood - the ring theory of personhood.理解人格的流动性本质——人格环理论。
Bioethics. 2015 Mar;29(3):171-81. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12085. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
7
Best interests determination within the Singapore context.新加坡语境下的最佳利益判定。
Nurs Ethics. 2012 Nov;19(6):787-99. doi: 10.1177/0969733011433316. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
8
Chinese familial tradition and Western influence: a case study in Singapore on decision making at the end of life.中西方家庭传统与影响:新加坡末期决策案例研究。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010 Dec;40(6):932-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.06.010.
9
Towards an alternative approach to personhood in the end of life questions.探寻临终问题中关于人格的另一种方法。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2000 Nov;21(6):515-36. doi: 10.1023/a:1026559716715.
10
Concepts of personhood and autonomy as they apply to end-of-life decisions in intensive care.人格与自主性概念在重症监护临终决策中的应用
Med Health Care Philos. 2015 Aug;18(3):309-15. doi: 10.1007/s11019-014-9604-7.