• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新加坡语境下的最佳利益判定。

Best interests determination within the Singapore context.

机构信息

Department of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Centre, Singapore.

出版信息

Nurs Ethics. 2012 Nov;19(6):787-99. doi: 10.1177/0969733011433316. Epub 2012 Apr 30.

DOI:10.1177/0969733011433316
PMID:22547489
Abstract

Familialism is a significant mindset within Singaporean culture. Its effects through the practice of familial determination and filial piety, which calls for a family centric approach to care determination over and above individual autonomy, affect many elements of local care provision. However, given the complex psychosocial, political and cultural elements involved, the applicability and viability of this model as well as that of a physician-led practice is increasingly open to conjecture. This article will investigate some of these concerns before proffering a decision-making process based upon a multidisciplinary team approach. It will be shown that such a multidimensional and multiprofessional approach is more in keeping with the inclusive and patient-centred ethos of palliative care than prevailing practices. It will be shown that such an approach will also be better placed to deliver holistic, coherent and sensitive end-of-life care that palliative care espouses.

摘要

家庭主义是新加坡文化中的一个重要观念。它通过家庭决定和孝道的实践产生影响,这种实践要求以家庭为中心来决定护理,而不是个人自主,这影响了当地护理提供的许多方面。然而,考虑到涉及的复杂心理社会、政治和文化因素,这种模式以及医生主导实践的适用性和可行性越来越受到质疑。本文将探讨其中的一些问题,然后提出一种基于多学科团队方法的决策过程。研究表明,与流行的做法相比,这种多维度和多专业的方法更符合姑息治疗的包容性和以患者为中心的精神。研究还表明,这种方法更能提供姑息治疗所倡导的整体、连贯和敏感的临终关怀。

相似文献

1
Best interests determination within the Singapore context.新加坡语境下的最佳利益判定。
Nurs Ethics. 2012 Nov;19(6):787-99. doi: 10.1177/0969733011433316. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
2
Chinese familial tradition and Western influence: a case study in Singapore on decision making at the end of life.中西方家庭传统与影响:新加坡末期决策案例研究。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010 Dec;40(6):932-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.06.010.
3
Limits to relational autonomy--the Singaporean experience.关系自主性的局限——新加坡的经验
Nurs Ethics. 2015 May;22(3):331-40. doi: 10.1177/0969733014533239. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
4
The influence of the family in conceptions of personhood in the palliative care setting in Singapore and its influence upon decision making.家庭对新加坡姑息治疗环境中人格观念的影响及其对决策的影响。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2014 Sep;31(6):645-54. doi: 10.1177/1049909113500136. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
5
[Multiprofessional cooperation in palliative care].[姑息治疗中的多专业合作]
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2007 Apr;42(4):296-301. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-980033.
6
The relationship between surgery and medicine in palliative care.姑息治疗中外科与内科的关系。
Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2001 Jan;10(1):57-70.
7
Understanding the fluid nature of personhood - the ring theory of personhood.理解人格的流动性本质——人格环理论。
Bioethics. 2015 Mar;29(3):171-81. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12085. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
8
[Ethics and the end of life, what help for the family?].[伦理与生命的终结,如何帮助家庭?]
Soins Gerontol. 2005 Sep-Oct(55):27-30.
9
Preliminary report of the integration of a palliative care team into an intensive care unit.重症监护病房姑息治疗团队整合的初步报告。
Palliat Med. 2010 Mar;24(2):154-65. doi: 10.1177/0269216309346540. Epub 2009 Oct 13.
10
Navigating complex end-of-life decisions in a family-centric society.在以家庭为中心的社会中应对复杂的临终决策。
Nurs Ethics. 2020 Jun;27(4):1003-1011. doi: 10.1177/0969733019876304. Epub 2019 Oct 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the lived experience of Chinese family caregivers caring for end-of-life cancer patients at home: a phenomenological study in Singapore.探索中国家庭照顾者在家中照顾晚期癌症患者的生活经历:新加坡的一项现象学研究
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jan 17;33(2):111. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09166-6.
2
Caring for terminally Ill patients: the impact on oncologists.关怀终末期患者:对肿瘤学家的影响。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Sep 28;23(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01562-9.
3
A systematic scoping review on patients' perceptions of dignity.
系统评价患者尊严感的研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Jul 4;21(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01004-4.
4
Mentoring in palliative medicine in the time of covid-19: a systematic scoping review : Mentoring programs during COVID-19.在新冠疫情期间的姑息医学中的指导:系统范围综述:COVID-19 期间的指导计划。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 May 11;22(1):359. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03409-4.
5
Use of the welfare-based model in the application of palliative sedation.基于福利的模式在姑息性镇静中的应用
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2018 Mar 17;10(1):93-101. doi: 10.1007/s41649-018-0050-3. eCollection 2018 Mar.
6
Stakeholder perspective on barrier to the implementation of Advance Care Planning in a traditionally paternalistic healthcare system.利益相关者对传统家长式医疗体系中实施预立医疗照护计划的障碍的看法。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 10;15(11):e0242085. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242085. eCollection 2020.
7
Perspectives on decision making amongst older people with end-stage renal disease and caregivers in Singapore: A qualitative study.新加坡终末期肾病老年患者及其照顾者决策观点的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2019 Oct;22(5):1100-1110. doi: 10.1111/hex.12943. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
8
Addressing the Concerns Surrounding Continuous Deep Sedation in Singapore and Southeast Asia: A Palliative Care Approach.应对新加坡和东南亚地区围绕持续深度镇静的问题:一种姑息治疗方法。
J Bioeth Inq. 2015 Sep;12(3):461-75. doi: 10.1007/s11673-015-9651-7. Epub 2015 Jul 15.