• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青少年腰椎峡部裂中峡部裂椎体的节段性脊柱前凸:双侧L5和L4峡部裂之间的差异

Segmental Lordosis of the Spondylolytic Vertebrae in Adolescent Lumbar Spondylolysis: Differences between Bilateral L5 and L4 Spondylolysis.

作者信息

Sugawara Kazuhiro, Iesato Noriyuki, Katayose Masaki

机构信息

Medical Center, Japan Institute of Sports Sciences, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan.

出版信息

Asian Spine J. 2018 Dec;12(6):1037-1042. doi: 10.31616/asj.2018.12.6.1037. Epub 2018 Oct 16.

DOI:10.31616/asj.2018.12.6.1037
PMID:30322253
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6284115/
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate whether segmental lumbar hyperlordosis of the affected vertebra in patients with spondylolysis occurs only at L5 or also occurs at L4.

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

To the best of our knowledge, increase in segmental lordosis of the spondylolytic vertebrae has only been investigated in bilateral L5 spondylolysis; it has not been examined at different levels of bilateral spondylolysis. According to the characteristics of segmental lordosis in bilateral L5 spondylolysis, patients with bilateral L4 spondylolysis may also have increased segmental lordosis of the L4 vertebra.

METHODS

Patients with bilateral spondylolysis of the L5 or L4 vertebra in 2013-2015 were retrospectively identified from the hospital database. Standing lateral lumbar radiographs were assessed for the angle of segmental lordosis of the L5 and L4 vertebra, sacral slope, and lumbar lordosis. The differences in segmental lordosis of the L5 and L4 vertebra, sacral slope, and lumbar lordosis were determined using non-paired Student t-test.

RESULTS

Overall, 15 cases of bilateral L4 spondylolysis and 41 cases of bilateral L5 spondylolysis satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Lordosis of the L4 vertebra was significantly greater in the bilateral L4 spondylolysis group (24.2°±7.0°) than that in the L5 spondylolysis group (20.3°±6.1°, p=0.047). Lordosis of the L5 vertebra was significantly lower in the L4 spondylolysis group (27.7°±8.2°) than that in the L5 spondylolysis group (32.5°±7.3°, p=0.040). The sacral slope and lumbar lordosis did not significantly differ between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Adolescent patients with bilateral spondylolysis have segmental hyperlordosis of the affected vertebra not only at the L5 level but also at the L4 level.

摘要

研究设计

回顾性研究。

目的

本研究旨在调查椎弓根峡部裂患者患椎的节段性腰椎前凸增大是否仅发生在L5,还是也发生在L4。

文献综述

据我们所知,仅对双侧L5椎弓根峡部裂患者椎弓根峡部裂椎体的节段性前凸增加进行了研究;尚未在双侧椎弓根峡部裂的不同节段进行检查。根据双侧L5椎弓根峡部裂节段性前凸的特点,双侧L4椎弓根峡部裂患者的L4椎体节段性前凸也可能增加。

方法

从医院数据库中回顾性识别出2013年至2015年双侧L5或L4椎体椎弓根峡部裂的患者。对站立位腰椎侧位X线片进行评估,测量L5和L4椎体的节段性前凸角度、骶骨倾斜度和腰椎前凸。使用非配对学生t检验确定L5和L4椎体的节段性前凸、骶骨倾斜度和腰椎前凸的差异。

结果

总体而言,15例双侧L4椎弓根峡部裂和41例双侧L5椎弓根峡部裂患者符合纳入和排除标准。双侧L4椎弓根峡部裂组L4椎体的前凸(24.2°±7.0°)显著大于L5椎弓根峡部裂组(20.3°±6.1°,p=0.047)。L4椎弓根峡部裂组L5椎体的前凸(27.7°±8.2°)显著低于L5椎弓根峡部裂组(32.5°±7.3°,p=0.040)。两组之间的骶骨倾斜度和腰椎前凸无显著差异。

结论

双侧椎弓根峡部裂的青少年患者不仅在L5水平,而且在L4水平都存在患椎的节段性前凸增大。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1f4/6284115/2d9c5aa69ea9/asj-2018-12-6-1037f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1f4/6284115/8a08776e23d0/asj-2018-12-6-1037f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1f4/6284115/9d526ee86fc1/asj-2018-12-6-1037f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1f4/6284115/41eef7d1d33c/asj-2018-12-6-1037f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1f4/6284115/0a6b2ba231f3/asj-2018-12-6-1037f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1f4/6284115/40be33d7936f/asj-2018-12-6-1037f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1f4/6284115/2d9c5aa69ea9/asj-2018-12-6-1037f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1f4/6284115/8a08776e23d0/asj-2018-12-6-1037f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1f4/6284115/9d526ee86fc1/asj-2018-12-6-1037f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1f4/6284115/41eef7d1d33c/asj-2018-12-6-1037f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1f4/6284115/0a6b2ba231f3/asj-2018-12-6-1037f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1f4/6284115/40be33d7936f/asj-2018-12-6-1037f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1f4/6284115/2d9c5aa69ea9/asj-2018-12-6-1037f6.jpg

相似文献

1
Segmental Lordosis of the Spondylolytic Vertebrae in Adolescent Lumbar Spondylolysis: Differences between Bilateral L5 and L4 Spondylolysis.青少年腰椎峡部裂中峡部裂椎体的节段性脊柱前凸:双侧L5和L4峡部裂之间的差异
Asian Spine J. 2018 Dec;12(6):1037-1042. doi: 10.31616/asj.2018.12.6.1037. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
2
Influence of cage geometry on sagittal alignment in instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion.椎间融合器几何形状对后路腰椎椎间融合内固定矢状面排列的影响。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Aug 1;28(15):1693-9. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000083167.78853.D5.
3
Significance of interfacet distance, facet joint orientation, and lumbar lordosis in spondylolysis.峡部裂中界面距离、关节突关节方位和腰椎前凸的意义。
Clin Anat. 2012 Apr;25(3):391-7. doi: 10.1002/ca.21222. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
4
L4/5 Disc Herniation: Not Unusually Accompanied with L5/S1 Low-Grade Spondylolytic Spondylolisthesis.L4/5 椎间盘突出:并不常伴有 L5/S1 低度峡部裂性腰椎滑脱。
Orthop Surg. 2024 Feb;16(2):444-451. doi: 10.1111/os.13984. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
5
Lumbar lordosis and pars interarticularis fractures: a case-control study.腰椎前凸和关节突间骨折:一项病例对照研究。
Skeletal Radiol. 2012 Jul;41(7):817-22. doi: 10.1007/s00256-011-1296-y. Epub 2011 Oct 19.
6
Correlation of sacropelvic geometry with disc degeneration in spondylolytic cadaver specimens.腰骶部形态与峡部裂脊柱标本椎间盘退变的相关性。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Jan 1;37(1):E10-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182257bb0.
7
Interpedicular kinematics in an in vitro biomechanical assessment of a bilateral lumbar spondylolytic defect.双侧腰椎峡部裂缺损体外生物力学评估中的椎弓根间运动学
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2014 Dec;29(10):1108-15. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.10.002. Epub 2014 Oct 12.
8
Bilateral Pars Defects at the L4 Vertebra Result in Increased Degeneration When Compared With Those at L5: An Anatomic Study.与L5椎体双侧椎弓根峡部裂相比,L4椎体双侧椎弓根峡部裂导致退变增加:一项解剖学研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Feb;474(2):571-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4563-8. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
9
Lumbar spondylolysis: a life long dynamic condition? A cross sectional survey of 4.151 adults.腰椎峡部裂:一种终身动态病症?对4151名成年人的横断面调查。
Eur Spine J. 2007 Jun;16(6):821-8. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0250-5. Epub 2006 Nov 22.
10
Bilateral implantation of low-profile interbody fusion cages: subsidence, lordosis, and fusion analysis.双侧植入低轮廓椎间融合器:下沉、前凸及融合分析。
Spine J. 2003 Sep-Oct;3(5):377-87. doi: 10.1016/s1529-9430(03)00145-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimal cutoff point of vertebral body cross-sectional area as a morphological parameter for predicting lumbar spondylolysis.椎体横截面积的最佳截断点作为预测腰椎峡部裂的形态学参数。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Sep 15;102(37):e35173. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035173.
2
Impact of Individual Spinopelvic Anatomy on the Localization and Severity of Symptomatic Isthmic Spondylolisthesis.个体脊柱骨盆解剖结构对症状性峡部裂型腰椎滑脱症定位及严重程度的影响
Global Spine J. 2024 Nov;14(8):2311-2316. doi: 10.1177/21925682231178206. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
3
Spine Alignment in Standing and Maximal Upper Limb Elevation in Baseball Players with Lumbar Spondylolysis and Those without Low Back Pain.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of MRI signal changes in the adjacent pedicle of adolescent patients with fresh lumbar spondylolysis.青少年新鲜腰椎峡部裂患者相邻椎弓根的MRI信号变化分析
Eur Spine J. 2014 Sep;23(9):1892-5. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-3109-6. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
2
Conservative treatment for pediatric lumbar spondylolysis to achieve bone healing using a hard brace: what type and how long?: Clinical article.采用硬性支具治疗儿童腰椎峡部裂的保守治疗以实现骨愈合:哪种类型,多长时间?:临床文章。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Jun;16(6):610-4. doi: 10.3171/2012.2.SPINE10914. Epub 2012 Apr 20.
3
Lumbar lordosis and pars interarticularis fractures: a case-control study.
脊柱对线在站立位和最大上肢抬高位时的变化:腰椎峡部裂患者与无下腰痛患者的对比。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 12;20(4):3231. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043231.
4
Comparison of alignment and spondylolysis fracture angle in bilateral and unilateral spondylolysis.双侧和单侧峡部裂的对位对线和峡部裂骨折角度比较。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 18;17(10):e0276337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276337. eCollection 2022.
5
Sacropelvic Parameters and L5 Spondylolysis: Computed Tomography Analysis.骶骨盆参数与L5峡部裂:计算机断层扫描分析
Asian Spine J. 2022 Feb;16(1):66-74. doi: 10.31616/asj.2020.0442. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
腰椎前凸和关节突间骨折:一项病例对照研究。
Skeletal Radiol. 2012 Jul;41(7):817-22. doi: 10.1007/s00256-011-1296-y. Epub 2011 Oct 19.
4
Significance of interfacet distance, facet joint orientation, and lumbar lordosis in spondylolysis.峡部裂中界面距离、关节突关节方位和腰椎前凸的意义。
Clin Anat. 2012 Apr;25(3):391-7. doi: 10.1002/ca.21222. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
5
Incidence of lumbar spondylolysis in the general population in Japan based on multidetector computed tomography scans from two thousand subjects.基于两千例受试者的多层螺旋 CT 扫描,日本普通人群腰椎峡部裂的发生率。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Oct 1;34(21):2346-50. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b4abbe.
6
Conservative treatment of lumbar spondylolysis in childhood and adolescence: the radiological signs which predict healing.儿童及青少年腰椎峡部裂的保守治疗:预测愈合的放射学征象
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Feb;91(2):206-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B2.21256.
7
Computed tomography evaluation of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in asymptomatic patients.无症状患者椎弓根峡部裂和腰椎滑脱的计算机断层扫描评估
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Nov 15;31(24):E907-10. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000245947.31473.0a.
8
Sagittal alignment of the spine and pelvis in the presence of L5-s1 isthmic lysis and low-grade spondylolisthesis.存在L5-S1峡部裂和低度椎体滑脱时脊柱与骨盆的矢状位排列
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Oct 1;31(21):2484-90. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000239155.37261.69.
9
Lumbar spondylolysis in pediatric and adolescent soccer players.青少年足球运动员的腰椎峡部裂
Am J Sports Med. 2005 Nov;33(11):1688-93. doi: 10.1177/0363546505275645. Epub 2005 Aug 10.
10
Radiographic analysis of the sagittal alignment and balance of the spine in asymptomatic subjects.无症状受试者脊柱矢状位排列及平衡的影像学分析。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Feb;87(2):260-7. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02043.