• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

椎体横截面积的最佳截断点作为预测腰椎峡部裂的形态学参数。

Optimal cutoff point of vertebral body cross-sectional area as a morphological parameter for predicting lumbar spondylolysis.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Catholic Kwandong University of Korea College of Medicine, International ST. Mary`s Hospital, Incheon, Republic of Korea.

Catholic Kwandong University of Korea College of Medicine, Gangneung, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Sep 15;102(37):e35173. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035173.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000035173
PMID:37713872
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10508529/
Abstract

The relationship between vertebral body cross-sectional area (VBCSA) and spinal conditions associated with increased lumbar lordosis, such as lumbar spondylolysis (LSL), is not known. We investigated the morphological parameter, VBCSA, to predict LSL. The VBCSA on MRI has not been studied for its association with LSL. We hypothesized that VBCSA is an important morphological parameter for LSL prediction. We collected VBCSA data from 90 patients (43 males and 47 females) with LSL and 91 control subjects (44 males and 47 females) who underwent lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging (LS-MRI). Axial T2-weighted LS-MRI images were obtained from all participants. Using our picture archiving and communications system, we analyzed the VBCSA at the level of the L5 vertebral body by utilizing MRI. The average VBCSA was 2263.51 ± 306.02 mm2 in the male control group and 1820.92 ± 224.89 mm2 in the male LSL group. LSL patients had significantly lower VBCSAs (P < .001) than did the male controls. The average VBCSA was 1985.21 ± 258.05 mm2 in the female control group and 1553.73 ± 250.02 mm2 in the female LSL group, and the LSL patients also had significantly lower VBCSAs (P < .001) than did the female controls. The optimal VBCSA cutoff value in the male group was 2014.69 mm2 with 76.7% sensitivity, 75.0% specificity, and an area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.82-0.95). In the female group, the optimal cutoff score was 1814.11 mm2 with 76.6% sensitivity, 76.6% specificity, and an AUC of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.82-0.95). VBCSA is a sensitive objective morphological parameter for assessing LSL, and a lower VBCSA is associated with a higher possibility of LSL. We believe that these results will be useful in diagnostic radiology for evaluating patients with LSL.

摘要

椎体横截面积(VBCSA)与增加腰椎前凸相关的脊柱状况(如腰椎峡部裂,LSL)之间的关系尚不清楚。我们研究了形态参数 VBCSA,以预测 LSL。MRI 上的 VBCSA 尚未研究其与 LSL 的关系。我们假设 VBCSA 是预测 LSL 的重要形态学参数。我们收集了 90 例 LSL 患者(43 名男性和 47 名女性)和 91 例对照组(44 名男性和 47 名女性)的 VBCSA 数据,这些患者均接受了腰椎磁共振成像(LS-MRI)检查。所有参与者均接受轴向 T2 加权 LS-MRI 图像检查。使用我们的图片存档和通信系统,通过 MRI 分析 L5 椎体水平的 VBCSA。男性对照组的平均 VBCSA 为 2263.51±306.02mm2,男性 LSL 组的平均 VBCSA 为 1820.92±224.89mm2。LSL 患者的 VBCSA 明显低于男性对照组(P<0.001)。女性对照组的平均 VBCSA 为 1985.21±258.05mm2,女性 LSL 组的平均 VBCSA 为 1553.73±250.02mm2,LSL 患者的 VBCSA 也明显低于女性对照组(P<0.001)。男性组的最佳 VBCSA 截断值为 2014.69mm2,敏感性为 76.7%,特异性为 75.0%,接受者操作特征曲线(AUC)下面积为 0.89(95%CI:0.82-0.95)。在女性组中,最佳截断值为 1814.11mm2,敏感性为 76.6%,特异性为 76.6%,AUC 为 0.88(95%CI:0.82-0.95)。VBCSA 是评估 LSL 的敏感客观形态学参数,较低的 VBCSA 与较高的 LSL 可能性相关。我们相信这些结果将有助于诊断放射学评估 LSL 患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef47/10508529/0779ecd1e822/medi-102-e35173-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef47/10508529/d5a13d80ae5a/medi-102-e35173-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef47/10508529/891ddcf929b1/medi-102-e35173-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef47/10508529/0779ecd1e822/medi-102-e35173-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef47/10508529/d5a13d80ae5a/medi-102-e35173-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef47/10508529/891ddcf929b1/medi-102-e35173-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef47/10508529/0779ecd1e822/medi-102-e35173-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Optimal cutoff point of vertebral body cross-sectional area as a morphological parameter for predicting lumbar spondylolysis.椎体横截面积的最佳截断点作为预测腰椎峡部裂的形态学参数。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Sep 15;102(37):e35173. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035173.
2
Increased Lumbar Lordosis and Smaller Vertebral Cross-Sectional Area Are Associated With Spondylolysis.腰椎前凸增加和更小的椎体横截面积与脊椎裂有关。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Jun 15;43(12):833-838. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002480.
3
The Role of the Ligamentum Flavum Area as a Morphological Parameter of Lumbar Central Spinal Stenosis.黄韧带区域作为腰椎中央椎管狭窄症形态学参数的作用
Pain Physician. 2017 Mar;20(3):E419-E424.
4
Significance of interfacet distance, facet joint orientation, and lumbar lordosis in spondylolysis.峡部裂中界面距离、关节突关节方位和腰椎前凸的意义。
Clin Anat. 2012 Apr;25(3):391-7. doi: 10.1002/ca.21222. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
5
Dural sac area is a more sensitive parameter for evaluating lumbar spinal stenosis than spinal canal area: A retrospective study.与椎管面积相比,硬膜囊面积是评估腰椎管狭窄症更敏感的参数:一项回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Dec;96(49):e9087. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009087.
6
Superior articular process cross-sectional area is a new sensitive parameter for the diagnosis of lumbar central canal spinal stenosis.上关节突横截面积是诊断腰椎中央管狭窄症的一个新的敏感参数。
Clin Interv Aging. 2018 Sep 17;13:1763-1767. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S172355. eCollection 2018.
7
Effect of lumbar lordosis angle on the development of lumbar spondylolysis in adolescent baseball players: A cross-sectional study.腰椎前凸角度对青少年棒球运动员腰椎峡部裂发展的影响:一项横断面研究。
J Orthop Sci. 2024 Sep;29(5):1183-1187. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2023.09.004. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
8
Comparative analysis of morphologival parameters in isolated and fused L5 spondylolysis patients on the basis of CT features.基于CT特征对孤立性和融合性L5椎弓根峡部裂患者形态学参数的对比分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Feb 1;26(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08357-w.
9
Characteristics of Lumbar Pars Interarticularis and Pedicle Stress Injuries by Sport in 902 Pediatric and Adolescent Athletes: A Retrospective Study.902 名儿童和青少年运动员的运动相关性腰椎弓根间和椎弓峡部应力性损伤的特征:一项回顾性研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2024 Nov;52(13):3388-3395. doi: 10.1177/03635465241283054. Epub 2024 Oct 14.
10
Congenital lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective, control-matched, cohort radiographic analysis.先天性腰椎管狭窄症:一项前瞻性、对照匹配队列影像学分析。
Spine J. 2005 Nov-Dec;5(6):615-22. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.05.385.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative analysis of morphologival parameters in isolated and fused L5 spondylolysis patients on the basis of CT features.基于CT特征对孤立性和融合性L5椎弓根峡部裂患者形态学参数的对比分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Feb 1;26(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08357-w.

本文引用的文献

1
No more tears from surgical site infections in interventional pain management.介入性疼痛管理中手术部位感染不再引发痛苦
Korean J Pain. 2023 Jan 1;36(1):11-50. doi: 10.3344/kjp.22397.
2
Effectiveness of percutaneous epidural neuroplasty using a balloon catheter in patients with chronic spinal stenosis accompanying mild spondylolisthesis: a longitudinal cohort study.使用球囊导管进行经皮硬膜外神经成形术治疗伴有轻度椎体滑脱的慢性椎管狭窄患者的有效性:一项纵向队列研究。
Korean J Pain. 2023 Apr 1;36(2):184-194. doi: 10.3344/kjp.22289. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
3
Ultrasound-guided epidural block in axial spondyloarthritis patients with limited spine mobility: a randomized controlled trial.
超声引导下对脊柱活动受限的轴性脊柱关节炎患者进行硬膜外阻滞:一项随机对照试验
Korean J Pain. 2021 Jan 1;34(1):114-123. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2021.34.1.114.
4
A prediction model of low back pain risk: a population based cohort study in Korea.腰痛风险预测模型:韩国一项基于人群的队列研究。
Korean J Pain. 2020 Apr 1;33(2):153-165. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2020.33.2.153.
5
The effect of needle tip position on the analgesic efficacy of pulsed radiofrequency treatment in patients with chronic lumbar radicular pain: a retrospective observational study.针尖位置对慢性腰神经根性疼痛患者脉冲射频治疗镇痛效果的影响:一项回顾性观察研究。
Korean J Pain. 2019 Oct 1;32(4):280-285. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2019.32.4.280.
6
Segmental Lordosis of the Spondylolytic Vertebrae in Adolescent Lumbar Spondylolysis: Differences between Bilateral L5 and L4 Spondylolysis.青少年腰椎峡部裂中峡部裂椎体的节段性脊柱前凸:双侧L5和L4峡部裂之间的差异
Asian Spine J. 2018 Dec;12(6):1037-1042. doi: 10.31616/asj.2018.12.6.1037. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
7
Physical features of pediatric patients with lumbar spondylolysis and effectiveness of rehabilitation.腰椎峡部裂患儿的身体特征及康复效果
J Med Invest. 2018;65(3.4):177-183. doi: 10.2152/jmi.65.177.
8
Factors Associated with the Symptoms of Young Adults with L5 Spondylolysis.与L5椎弓根峡部裂青年成人症状相关的因素。
Asian Spine J. 2018 Jun;12(3):476-483. doi: 10.4184/asj.2018.12.3.476. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
9
Radiographic analysis of the listhesis associated with lumbar isthmic spondylolysis.腰椎峡部裂伴滑脱的影像学分析。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 Sep;104(5):569-573. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.02.017. Epub 2018 May 25.
10
Predictive Factors for the Outcome of Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolysis in Young Sporting Individuals.年轻运动人群腰椎峡部裂手术治疗结果的预测因素
Global Spine J. 2018 Apr;8(2):121-128. doi: 10.1177/2192568217713008. Epub 2017 Jun 30.