Quarta Marco, Cromie Lear Melinda J, Blonigan Justin, Paine Patrick, Chacon Robert, Rando Thomas A
1Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
2Paul F. Glenn Laboratories for the Biology of Aging, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
NPJ Regen Med. 2018 Oct 10;3:18. doi: 10.1038/s41536-018-0057-0. eCollection 2018.
Despite the regenerative capacity of muscle, tissue volume is not restored after volumetric muscle loss (VML), perhaps due to a loss-of-structural extracellular matrix. We recently demonstrated the structural and functional restoration of muscle tissue in a mouse model of VML using an engineered "bioconstruct," comprising an extracellular matrix scaffold (decellularized muscle), muscle stem cells (MuSCs), and muscle-resident cells (MRCs). To test the ability of the cell-based bioconstruct to restore whole-muscle biomechanics, we measured biomechanical parameters in uninjured muscles, muscles injured to produce VML lesions, and in muscles that were injured and then treated by implanting either the scaffolds alone or with bioconstructs containing the scaffolds, MuSCs, and MRCs. We measured the active and passive forces over a range of lengths, viscoelastic force relaxation, optimal length, and twitch dynamics. Injured muscles showed a narrowed length-tension curve or lower force over a narrower range of muscle lengths, and increased passive force. When treated with bioconstructs, but not with scaffolds alone, injured muscles showed active and passive length-tension relationships that were not different from uninjured muscles. Moreover, injured muscles treated with bioconstructs exhibited reduced fibrosis compared to injured muscles either untreated or treated with scaffolds alone. The cell-based bioconstruct is a promising treatment approach for future translational efforts to restore whole-muscle biomechanics in muscles with VML lesions.
尽管肌肉具有再生能力,但在发生大面积肌肉损失(VML)后,组织体积并未恢复,这可能是由于结构性细胞外基质的丧失所致。我们最近在VML小鼠模型中,使用一种工程化的“生物构建体”证明了肌肉组织的结构和功能得以恢复,该构建体由细胞外基质支架(脱细胞肌肉)、肌肉干细胞(MuSCs)和肌肉驻留细胞(MRCs)组成。为了测试基于细胞的生物构建体恢复全肌肉生物力学的能力,我们测量了未受伤肌肉、造成VML损伤的受伤肌肉以及受伤后分别植入单独支架或包含支架、MuSCs和MRCs的生物构建体进行治疗的肌肉的生物力学参数。我们测量了一系列长度范围内的主动和被动力、粘弹性力松弛、最佳长度和抽搐动力学。受伤肌肉在较窄的肌肉长度范围内显示出长度-张力曲线变窄或力量降低,以及被动力增加。当用生物构建体治疗时,而不是仅用支架治疗时,受伤肌肉的主动和被动长度-张力关系与未受伤肌肉无异。此外,与未治疗或仅用支架治疗的受伤肌肉相比,用生物构建体治疗的受伤肌肉纤维化程度降低。基于细胞的生物构建体是一种很有前景的治疗方法,有望用于未来恢复VML损伤肌肉全肌肉生物力学的转化研究。