• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

能力建设和政策、系统及环境变革的实施:国家癌症综合防控计划调查结果。

Capacity Building for and Implementation of Policy, Systems, and Environmental Change: Results from a Survey of the National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program.

机构信息

1Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.

2Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, Ohio.

出版信息

Popul Health Manag. 2019 Aug;22(4):330-338. doi: 10.1089/pop.2018.0082. Epub 2018 Oct 17.

DOI:10.1089/pop.2018.0082
PMID:30332328
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6470052/
Abstract

Policy, systems, and environmental (PSE) approaches are commonly used to improve population health. Cancer-related examples include providing data and education to stakeholders about policies that support healthy living, or health systems changes such as universal reminders about recommended cancer screening. The National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program (NCCCP) funds health departments to form cancer coalitions that develop and implement cancer plans. NCCCP initiated a demonstration program in 13 of 65 funded grantees to determine whether skilled, dedicated staffing and using a strategic process to examine data, form a workgroup, and develop an agenda would enhance their capacity to implement PSE approaches, recruit new partners, and provide data and education to stakeholders. The objective of this study was to compare demonstration program grantees to other NCCCP grantees on their ability to develop and implement PSE strategies, and the short-term results that were achieved. Program directors (PDs) from each NCCCP-funded jurisdiction completed web surveys at 2 time points during implementation to assess changes in their capacity for PSE approaches, identify implementation activities, and document short-term outcomes. Responses from demonstration program PDs and other PDs at both time points were compared in a descriptive analysis. Demonstration program grantees experienced greater increases in skills and capacity to address PSE approaches, engaged in necessary implementation activities more often, and achieved greater improvements in stakeholder and decision maker awareness and support for PSE strategies, compared to nonparticipating NCCCP grantees. These findings support continued implementation of PSE approaches for sustainable cancer prevention and control.

摘要

政策、系统和环境(PSE)方法常用于改善人群健康。癌症相关的例子包括向利益攸关方提供支持健康生活的政策数据和教育,或进行卫生系统改革,如普遍提醒建议的癌症筛查。国家综合癌症控制计划(NCCCP)资助卫生部门成立癌症联盟,制定和实施癌症计划。NCCCP 在 65 个受资助的赠款中选择了 13 个,启动了一个示范项目,以确定是否熟练、专注的人员配备以及使用战略性的流程来检查数据、组建工作组和制定议程,将增强其实施 PSE 方法、招募新合作伙伴以及向利益攸关方提供数据和教育的能力。本研究的目的是比较示范项目赠款接受者与 NCCCP 其他赠款接受者在制定和实施 PSE 策略方面的能力,以及取得的短期成果。在实施过程中的两个时间点,每个 NCCCP 资助的司法管辖区的项目主任(PD)都完成了网络调查,以评估他们在 PSE 方法方面的能力变化,确定实施活动,并记录短期结果。在描述性分析中比较了示范项目 PD 和其他 PD 在两个时间点的回复。与未参与的 NCCCP 赠款接受者相比,示范项目赠款接受者在解决 PSE 方法的技能和能力方面经历了更大的增长,更频繁地开展必要的实施活动,并在利益攸关者和决策者对 PSE 策略的认识和支持方面取得了更大的改善。这些发现支持继续实施 PSE 方法,以实现可持续的癌症预防和控制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcbd/6470052/a038706cbba7/nihms-989029-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcbd/6470052/ac2c22e7b61b/nihms-989029-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcbd/6470052/a038706cbba7/nihms-989029-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcbd/6470052/ac2c22e7b61b/nihms-989029-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcbd/6470052/a038706cbba7/nihms-989029-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Capacity Building for and Implementation of Policy, Systems, and Environmental Change: Results from a Survey of the National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program.能力建设和政策、系统及环境变革的实施:国家癌症综合防控计划调查结果。
Popul Health Manag. 2019 Aug;22(4):330-338. doi: 10.1089/pop.2018.0082. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
2
Prioritizing Population Approaches in Cancer Prevention and Control: Results of a Case Study Evaluation of Policy, Systems, and Environmental Change.在癌症预防和控制中优先考虑人群方法:政策、系统和环境变化案例研究评估的结果。
Popul Health Manag. 2019 Jun;22(3):205-212. doi: 10.1089/pop.2018.0081. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
3
An evaluation of cancer survivorship activities across national comprehensive cancer control programs.对全国综合癌症控制项目中的癌症幸存者活动进行评估。
J Cancer Surviv. 2015 Sep;9(3):554-9. doi: 10.1007/s11764-015-0432-4. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
4
What Does a Performance Measurement System Tell Us About the National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program?绩效评估系统能告诉我们关于国家癌症综合控制计划的哪些信息?
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2015 Sep-Oct;21(5):449-58. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000124.
5
Cancer Plan Index: a measure for assessing the quality of cancer plans.癌症计划指数:评估癌症计划质量的指标。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2011 Nov-Dec;17(6):E12-7. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e318215a603.
6
Implementation of an Individual + Policy, System, and Environmental (I + PSE) Technical Assistance Initiative to Increase Capacity of MCH Nutrition Strategic Planning.实施个体+政策、系统和环境(I+PSE)技术援助倡议,以增强妇幼营养战略规划能力。
Matern Child Health J. 2022 Aug;26(Suppl 1):216-228. doi: 10.1007/s10995-022-03435-0. Epub 2022 May 21.
7
Evidence-Based Cancer Survivorship Activities for Comprehensive Cancer Control.基于证据的癌症幸存者综合癌症控制活动。
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Dec;49(6 Suppl 5):S536-42. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.08.011.
8
Physical Activity Policy, Systems, and Environment Change Through Extension SNAP-Ed: A Multistate Perspective.通过推广补充营养援助计划教育实现体育活动政策、系统和环境变化:多州视角
Health Promot Pract. 2025 Jan;26(1):39-45. doi: 10.1177/15248399231221779. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
9
Leveraging the strength of comprehensive cancer control coalitions to support policy, systems, and environmental change.利用综合癌症控制联盟的力量来支持政策、系统和环境的改变。
Cancer Causes Control. 2019 Oct;30(10):1033-1044. doi: 10.1007/s10552-019-01215-w. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
10
Adoption and Implementation of Evidence-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Interventions Among Cancer Control Program Grantees, 2009-2015.2009-2015 年,癌症控制项目受赠者对基于证据的结直肠癌筛查干预措施的采用和实施情况。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 Oct 10;16:E139. doi: 10.5888/pcd16.180682.

引用本文的文献

1
The Key to Pivoting and Adapting: Networked Partnerships, Long-Standing Relationships, and Functioning Program Infrastructure.转型与适应的关键:网络合作伙伴关系、长期关系及有效的项目基础设施。
Health Promot Pract. 2023 May;24(1_suppl):5S-9S. doi: 10.1177/15248399221150781. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
2
Still Lost in Transition? Perspectives of Ongoing Cancer Survivorship Care Needs from Comprehensive Cancer Control Programs, Survivors, and Health Care Providers.仍处于转型之中?综合癌症控制项目、癌症幸存者和医疗保健提供者对持续癌症生存者护理需求的观点。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 4;19(5):3037. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19053037.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Prioritizing Population Approaches in Cancer Prevention and Control: Results of a Case Study Evaluation of Policy, Systems, and Environmental Change.在癌症预防和控制中优先考虑人群方法:政策、系统和环境变化案例研究评估的结果。
Popul Health Manag. 2019 Jun;22(3):205-212. doi: 10.1089/pop.2018.0081. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
2
Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975-2014, Featuring Survival.《1975 - 2014年美国癌症现状年度报告:聚焦生存率》
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017 Sep 1;109(9). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx030.
3
Changes in the Leading Cause of Death: Recent Patterns in Heart Disease and Cancer Mortality.
Promoting congregant health in faith-based organizations across Los Angeles County, 2013-2016.
2013 - 2016年在洛杉矶县各宗教组织中促进信众健康
Prev Med Rep. 2019 Aug 1;16:100963. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100963. eCollection 2019 Dec.
4
Leveraging the strength of comprehensive cancer control coalitions to support policy, systems, and environmental change.利用综合癌症控制联盟的力量来支持政策、系统和环境的改变。
Cancer Causes Control. 2019 Oct;30(10):1033-1044. doi: 10.1007/s10552-019-01215-w. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
主要死因的变化:心脏病和癌症死亡率的近期模式
NCHS Data Brief. 2016 Aug(254):1-8.
4
Pathways to Program Success: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) of Communities Putting Prevention to Work Case Study Programs.项目成功之路:对“让预防工作发挥作用”社区案例研究项目的定性比较分析(QCA)
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2017 Mar/Apr;23(2):104-111. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000449.
5
American Cancer Society Head and Neck Cancer Survivorship Care Guideline.美国癌症协会头颈部癌症生存者护理指南。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 May;66(3):203-39. doi: 10.3322/caac.21343. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
6
American Cancer Society/American Society of Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Survivorship Care Guideline.美国癌症协会/美国临床肿瘤学会乳腺癌生存者护理指南。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jan-Feb;66(1):43-73. doi: 10.3322/caac.21319. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
7
American Cancer Society Colorectal Cancer Survivorship Care Guidelines.美国癌症协会结直肠癌生存护理指南。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Nov-Dec;65(6):428-55. doi: 10.3322/caac.21286. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
8
Promoting Policy, Systems, and Environment Change to Prevent Chronic Disease: Lessons Learned From the King County Communities Putting Prevention to Work Initiative.促进政策、系统和环境变革以预防慢性病:从金县“让预防发挥作用”倡议社区汲取的经验教训。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2016 Jul-Aug;22(4):348-59. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000313.
9
What strategies are used to build practitioners' capacity to implement community-based interventions and are they effective?: a systematic review.为增强从业者实施社区干预措施的能力采用了哪些策略,这些策略是否有效?一项系统综述
Implement Sci. 2015 May 29;10:80. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0272-7.
10
Policy, systems, and environmental change in the Mississippi Delta: considerations for evaluation design.密西西比三角洲的政策、系统与环境变化:评估设计考量
Health Educ Behav. 2015 Apr;42(1 Suppl):57S-66S. doi: 10.1177/1090198114568428.