Legood Alison, Lee Allan, Schwarz Gary, Newman Alexander
Aston Business School Aston University Birmingham UK.
University of Exeter Business School University of Exeter UK.
J Occup Organ Psychol. 2018 Jun;91(2):430-439. doi: 10.1111/joop.12205. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
This research examines the influence of leader procrastination on employee attitudes and behaviours. While previous studies have typically viewed procrastination as a form of self-defeating behaviour, this research explores its effects on others in the workplace. In Study 1, using data collected from 290 employees, we demonstrate the discriminant and relative predictive validity of leader procrastination on leadership effectiveness compared with laissez-faire leadership and directive leadership. In Study 2, based on dyadic data collected in three phases from 250 employees and their 23 supervisors, we found that leader procrastination was associated with follower discretionary behaviour (organizational citizenship behaviour and deviant behaviour). Additionally, job frustration was found to mediate the relationship between leader procrastination and follower outcomes. The quality of the leader-follower relationship, as a boundary condition, was shown to mitigate the detrimental effects of leader procrastination. Together, the findings suggest that leader procrastination is a distinct form of negative leadership behaviour that represents an important source of follower job frustration.
Leader procrastination is different from laissez-faire and directive leadership and can be detrimental to followers.Job frustration mediates the relationship between leader procrastination and follower discretionary behaviour.Organizations should facilitate high-quality LMX relationships as a method for mitigating the negative effects of leader procrastination.
本研究考察领导者拖延对员工态度和行为的影响。以往研究通常将拖延视为一种自我挫败行为的形式,而本研究探讨其在工作场所对他人的影响。在研究1中,我们使用从290名员工收集的数据,证明了与放任型领导和指令型领导相比,领导者拖延在领导有效性方面的区分效度和相对预测效度。在研究2中,基于从250名员工及其23名主管分三个阶段收集的二元数据,我们发现领导者拖延与下属的自主行为(组织公民行为和越轨行为)相关。此外,工作挫折被发现介导了领导者拖延与下属结果之间的关系。作为一个边界条件,领导-下属关系的质量被证明可以减轻领导者拖延的有害影响。总之,研究结果表明领导者拖延是一种独特的负面领导行为形式,是下属工作挫折的一个重要来源。
领导者拖延不同于放任型和指令型领导,可能对下属有害。工作挫折介导了领导者拖延与下属自主行为之间的关系。组织应促进高质量的领导-成员交换关系,作为减轻领导者拖延负面影响的一种方法。