• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

纯拖延量表的西班牙语验证:维度结构、内部一致性、时间稳定性、性别不变性以及与人格和生活满意度的关系。

Spanish validation of the pure procrastination scale: dimensional structure, internal consistency, temporal stability, gender invariance, and relationships with personality and satisfaction with life.

作者信息

Guilera Georgina, López-Martínez Maria Dolores, Barrios Maite, Hidalgo María Dolores, Steel Piers, Gómez-Benito Juana

机构信息

Department of Social Psychology and Quantitative Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 17;14:1268855. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1268855. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1268855
PMID:38298367
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10828008/
Abstract

The objective of the current study was to adapt and validate the pure procrastination scale (PPS) for the Spanish adult population. Procrastination can have numerous consequences in daily life, making it essential to have reliable and valid instruments for measuring procrastination. Thus, this study was conducted to address this need. The sample consisted of 596 adults aged 18-83 years (M = 35.25, SD = 13.75). In addition to the PPS, participants completed two procrastination measures, namely the irrational procrastination scale and the decisional procrastination questionnaire, alongside the Big Five inventory and the satisfaction with life scale. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis revealed a three-factor structure of the PPS. The examination of the reliability of scores in terms of internal consistency and temporal stability showed satisfactory results for the PPS scores. Moreover, gender invariance was observed at the scalar level. Finally, the PPS scores correlated with other measures of procrastination, personality traits, and satisfaction with life in the expected direction and magnitude. In conclusion, the Spanish PPS offers valid and reliable scores when administered to adult population.

摘要

本研究的目的是对西班牙成年人群体改编并验证纯拖延量表(PPS)。拖延在日常生活中可能会产生诸多后果,因此拥有可靠且有效的测量拖延的工具至关重要。故而开展本研究以满足这一需求。样本由596名年龄在18 - 83岁的成年人组成(均值 = 35.25,标准差 = 13.75)。除了PPS,参与者还完成了两项拖延测量工具,即非理性拖延量表和决策拖延问卷,同时还完成了大五人格量表和生活满意度量表。验证性因素分析结果显示PPS具有三因素结构。从内部一致性和时间稳定性方面对分数可靠性进行的检验表明,PPS分数的结果令人满意。此外,在标量水平上观察到了性别不变性。最后,PPS分数与其他拖延测量工具、人格特质以及生活满意度在预期的方向和程度上相关。总之,西班牙版PPS应用于成年人群体时能提供有效且可靠的分数。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64a8/10828008/5f8339291d16/fpsyg-14-1268855-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64a8/10828008/8bb571f51f32/fpsyg-14-1268855-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64a8/10828008/5f8339291d16/fpsyg-14-1268855-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64a8/10828008/8bb571f51f32/fpsyg-14-1268855-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64a8/10828008/5f8339291d16/fpsyg-14-1268855-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Spanish validation of the pure procrastination scale: dimensional structure, internal consistency, temporal stability, gender invariance, and relationships with personality and satisfaction with life.纯拖延量表的西班牙语验证:维度结构、内部一致性、时间稳定性、性别不变性以及与人格和生活满意度的关系。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 17;14:1268855. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1268855. eCollection 2023.
2
Validation of the Spanish version of the Irrational Procrastination Scale (IPS).《非理性拖延量表(IPS)》西班牙语版本的验证
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 5;13(1):e0190806. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190806. eCollection 2018.
3
Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Irrational Procrastination Scale: Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance Across Gender.中文版非理性拖延量表的心理测量特性:跨性别因素结构与测量不变性
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 18;12:768581. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.768581. eCollection 2021.
4
On the Measurement of Procrastination: Comparing Two Scales in Six European Countries.关于拖延的测量:在六个欧洲国家比较两种量表
Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 31;7:1307. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01307. eCollection 2016.
5
Validation of a French version of the pure procrastination scale (PPS).验证纯拖延量表(PPS)的法译本。
Compr Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;55(6):1442-7. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.04.024. Epub 2014 May 9.
6
Psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version of the pure procrastination scale, the irrational procrastination scale, and the susceptibility to temptation scale in a clinical population.纯拖延量表、非理性拖延量表和易受诱惑量表瑞典语版在临床人群中的心理测量评估。
BMC Psychol. 2014 Dec 11;2(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s40359-014-0054-z. eCollection 2014.
7
Irrational Delay Revisited: Examining Five Procrastination Scales in a Global Sample.重新审视非理性拖延:在全球样本中考察五种拖延量表
Front Psychol. 2017 Nov 3;8:1927. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01927. eCollection 2017.
8
Spanish Version of the Bedtime Procrastination Scale: Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation in a Sample of Nursing Students.《睡前拖延量表》西班牙语版:护理专业学生样本中的跨文化适应性和心理测量评估。
Psychol Rep. 2022 Jun;125(3):1765-1779. doi: 10.1177/00332941211005120. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
9
Development and validation of the while-in-bed-smartphone-use-induced sleep procrastination scale (WSPS) in Chinese undergraduates with/without problematic smartphone use.发展并验证了中文版智能手机卧床使用诱导睡眠拖延量表(WSPS),适用于有/无问题性智能手机使用的中国大学生。
Qual Life Res. 2023 Nov;32(11):3085-3098. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03457-3. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
10
Validation of a Latin-American Spanish version of the Body Esteem Scale for Adolescents and Adults (BESAA-LA) in Colombian and Nicaraguan adults.拉丁美洲西班牙语版青少年及成人身体自尊量表(BESAA-LA)在哥伦比亚和尼加拉瓜成年人中的效度验证
J Eat Disord. 2023 Dec 8;11(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s40337-023-00942-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Self-Report Measures of Procrastination Exhibit Inconsistent Concurrent Validity, Predictive Validity, and Psychometric Properties.拖延的自我报告测量在同时效度、预测效度和心理测量特性方面表现出不一致性。
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 24;13:784471. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.784471. eCollection 2022.
2
Gender, Socioeconomic Status, Cultural Differences, Education, Family Size and Procrastination: A Sociodemographic Meta-Analysis.性别、社会经济地位、文化差异、教育程度、家庭规模与拖延:一项社会人口学荟萃分析
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 5;12:719425. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.719425. eCollection 2021.
3
Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Irrational Procrastination Scale: Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance Across Gender.
中文版非理性拖延量表的心理测量特性:跨性别因素结构与测量不变性
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 18;12:768581. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.768581. eCollection 2021.
4
Procrastination at the Core of Physical Activity (PA) and Perceived Quality of Life: A New Approach for Counteracting Lower Levels of PA Practice.核心拖延与身体活动(PA)和感知生活质量:对抗较低 PA 实践水平的新方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 14;17(10):3413. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103413.
5
Young University Students' Academic Self-Regulation Profiles and Their Associated Procrastination: Autonomous Functioning Requires Self-Regulated Operations.青年大学生的学业自我调节概况及其相关的拖延行为:自主运作需要自我调节操作。
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 13;11:354. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00354. eCollection 2020.
6
The role of personality traits and need for cognition in active procrastination.人格特质和认知需求在积极拖延中的作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Aug;199:102883. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102883. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
7
From self-defeating to other defeating: Examining the effects of leader procrastination on follower work outcomes.从自我挫败到他人挫败:探究领导者拖延对下属工作成果的影响。
J Occup Organ Psychol. 2018 Jun;91(2):430-439. doi: 10.1111/joop.12205. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
8
birtr: A Package for "The Basics of Item Response Theory Using R".birtr:一个用于“使用R语言的项目反应理论基础”的软件包。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2018 Jul;42(5):403-404. doi: 10.1177/0146621617748327. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
9
Linking leadership style and workplace procrastination: The role of organizational citizenship behavior and turnover intention.连接领导风格与工作场所拖延:组织公民行为和离职意图的作用。
J Prev Interv Community. 2018 Jul-Sep;46(3):245-262. doi: 10.1080/10852352.2018.1470369.
10
Prediction and job-related outcomes of procrastination in the workplace.工作场所拖延行为的预测及其与工作相关的结果。
J Prev Interv Community. 2018 Jul-Sep;46(3):263-278. doi: 10.1080/10852352.2018.1470418.