• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

极早产儿的住院时间及其时间趋势在欧洲各地区存在差异。

Duration and Time Trends in Hospital Stay for Very Preterm Infants Differ Across European Regions.

机构信息

Children's Hospital, University Hospital, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

Inserm UMR 1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (Epopé), Center for Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité, DHU Risks in pregnancy, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.

出版信息

Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018 Dec;19(12):1153-1161. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001756.

DOI:10.1097/PCC.0000000000001756
PMID:30334907
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6282674/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare duration and changes over time in length of hospital stay for very preterm and extremely preterm infants in 10 European regions.

DESIGN

Two area-based cohort studies from the same regions in 2003 and 2011/2012.

SETTING

Ten regions from nine European countries.

PATIENTS

Infants born between 22 + 0 and 31 + 6 weeks of gestational age and surviving to discharge (Models of Organising Access to Intensive Care for Very Preterm Births cohort in 2003, n = 4,011 and Effective Perinatal Intensive Care in Europe cohort in 2011/2012, n = 4,336).

INTERVENTIONS

Observational study, no intervention.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Maternal and infant characteristics were abstracted from medical records using a common protocol and length of stay until discharge was adjusted for case-mix using negative binomial regression. Mean length of stay was 63.6 days in 2003 and varied from 52.4 to 76.5 days across regions. In 2011/2012, mean length of stay was 63.1 days, with a narrower regional range (54.0-70.1). Low gestational age, small for gestational age, low 5-minute Apgar score, surfactant administration, any surgery, and severe neonatal morbidities increased length of stay. Infant characteristics explained some of the differences between regions and over time, but large variations remained after adjustment. In 2011/2012, mean adjusted length of stay ranged from less than 54 days in the Northern region of the United Kingdom and Wielkopolska, Poland to over 67 days in the Ile-de-France region of France and the Eastern region of the Netherlands. No systematic decrease in very preterm length of stay was observed over time after adjustment for patient case-mix.

CONCLUSIONS

A better understanding of the discharge criteria and care practices that contribute to the wide differences in very preterm length of stay across European regions could inform policies to optimize discharge decisions in terms of infant outcomes and health system costs.

摘要

目的

比较欧洲 10 个地区非常早产和极早产婴儿的住院时间长短及其随时间的变化。

设计

来自 2003 年和 2011/2012 年同一地区的两项基于区域的队列研究。

设置

来自 9 个欧洲国家的 10 个地区。

患者

出生胎龄为 22+0 至 31+6 周且存活至出院的婴儿(2003 年的新生儿重症监护组织模式队列,n=4011 和 2011/2012 年的欧洲有效围产期重症监护队列,n=4336)。

干预措施

观察性研究,无干预措施。

测量和主要结果

使用统一方案从病历中提取母婴特征,并使用负二项回归调整病例组合,以调整至出院的住院时间。2003 年平均住院时间为 63.6 天,各地区住院时间从 52.4 天至 76.5 天不等。2011/2012 年,平均住院时间为 63.1 天,地区范围较窄(54.0-70.1)。低胎龄、小于胎龄、5 分钟 Apgar 评分低、表面活性剂给药、任何手术和严重新生儿并发症均会延长住院时间。婴儿特征解释了部分地区间和随时间的差异,但调整后仍存在较大差异。2011/2012 年,在英国北部和波兰大波兰省,平均调整后住院时间不到 54 天,而在法国法兰西岛大区和荷兰东部地区,平均调整后住院时间超过 67 天。调整患者病例组合后,未观察到非常早产住院时间随时间的系统减少。

结论

更好地了解导致欧洲各地区非常早产住院时间差异的出院标准和护理实践,可为优化出院决策提供信息,以改善婴儿结局和卫生系统成本。

相似文献

1
Duration and Time Trends in Hospital Stay for Very Preterm Infants Differ Across European Regions.极早产儿的住院时间及其时间趋势在欧洲各地区存在差异。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018 Dec;19(12):1153-1161. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001756.
2
Changes in neonatology: comparison of two cohorts of very preterm infants (gestational age <32 weeks): the Project On Preterm and Small for Gestational Age Infants 1983 and the Leiden Follow-Up Project on Prematurity 1996-1997.新生儿学的变化:两个极早产儿队列(胎龄<32周)的比较:1983年早产儿和小于胎龄儿项目以及1996 - 1997年莱顿早产随访项目。
Pediatrics. 2005 Feb;115(2):396-405. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1497.
3
Changes in neonatal morbidity, neonatal care practices, and length of hospital stay of surviving infants born very preterm in the Netherlands in the 1980s and in the 2000s: a comparison analysis with identical characteristics definitions.20 世纪 80 年代和 2000 年代荷兰极早产儿的新生儿发病率、新生儿护理实践和存活婴儿住院时间的变化:与相同特征定义的比较分析
BMC Pediatr. 2023 Nov 4;23(1):554. doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-04354-x.
4
Use of evidence based practices to improve survival without severe morbidity for very preterm infants: results from the EPICE population based cohort.运用循证实践改善极早产儿无严重发病情况下的存活率:基于EPICE人群队列研究的结果
BMJ. 2016 Jul 5;354:i2976. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i2976.
5
Wide variation in severe neonatal morbidity among very preterm infants in European regions.欧洲各地区极早产儿严重新生儿发病率存在较大差异。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2019 Jan;104(1):F36-F45. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313697. Epub 2018 Jan 20.
6
Variations in neonatal mortality of preterm infants with intraparenchymal haemorrhage in Europe: the EPICE cohort.欧洲脑室内出血早产儿的新生儿死亡率变化:EPICE 队列。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2024 Aug 16;109(5):488-494. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2023-326038.
7
Differences in rates and short-term outcome of live births before 32 weeks of gestation in Europe in 2003: results from the MOSAIC cohort.2003年欧洲妊娠32周前活产率及短期结局的差异:MOSAIC队列研究结果
Pediatrics. 2008 Apr;121(4):e936-44. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1620. Epub 2008 Mar 31.
8
Morbidity and trends in length of hospitalisation of very and extremely preterm infants born between 2008 and 2021 in the Netherlands: a cohort study.2008 年至 2021 年间荷兰极早早产儿和超早产儿的发病率和住院时间趋势:一项队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 4;14(6):e078842. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078842.
9
Optimising neonatal services for very preterm births between 27 and 31 weeks gestation in England: the OPTI-PREM mixed-methods study.优化英格兰妊娠27至31周极早产新生儿服务:OPTI-PREM混合方法研究
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Apr;13(12):1-126. doi: 10.3310/JYWC6538.
10
[Outcomes and care practices of extremely preterm infants at 22-25 weeks' gestation age from the Chinese Neonatal Network].中国新生儿网络中孕22-25周超早产儿的结局及护理实践
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Jan 2;62(1):22-28. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112140-20231017-00296.

引用本文的文献

1
Rapid identification of a Serratia marcescens outbreak in a neonatal intensive care unit by third-generation long-read nanopore sequencing.通过第三代长读长纳米孔测序快速鉴定新生儿重症监护病房中的粘质沙雷氏菌暴发。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2025 Jun 4;14(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13756-025-01582-x.
2
The Global Burden of Periodontal Disease: A Narrative Review on Unveiling Socioeconomic and Health Challenges.牙周病的全球负担:关于揭示社会经济和健康挑战的叙述性综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Apr 16;22(4):624. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22040624.
3
Clinical sequelae of gut microbiome development and disruption in hospitalized preterm infants.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Collaborative Versus Single-Site Quality Improvement to Reduce NICU Length of Stay.比较协作式与单站点质量改进以缩短 NICU 住院时间。
Pediatrics. 2018 Jul;142(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-1395. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
2
Wide variation in severe neonatal morbidity among very preterm infants in European regions.欧洲各地区极早产儿严重新生儿发病率存在较大差异。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2019 Jan;104(1):F36-F45. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313697. Epub 2018 Jan 20.
3
Variability in Very Preterm Stillbirth and In-Hospital Mortality Across Europe.
住院早产儿肠道微生物组发育和失调的临床后果。
Cell Host Microbe. 2024 Oct 9;32(10):1822-1837.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2024.07.027. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
4
Morbidity and trends in length of hospitalisation of very and extremely preterm infants born between 2008 and 2021 in the Netherlands: a cohort study.2008 年至 2021 年间荷兰极早早产儿和超早产儿的发病率和住院时间趋势:一项队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 4;14(6):e078842. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078842.
5
When should a premature neonate (24-35 weeks) be discharged? five-year experience from a single-center neonatal intensive care unit in Türkiye.早产儿(24-35 周)何时出院?来自土耳其某单中心新生儿重症监护病房的 5 年经验。
Turk J Med Sci. 2023 May 3;53(5):1244-1253. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5690. eCollection 2023.
6
Length of hospital stay and factors associated with very-low-birth-weight preterm neonates surviving to discharge a cross-sectional study, 2022.2022 年一项关于极低出生体重早产儿存活至出院的住院时间及相关因素的横断面研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2024 Jan 26;24(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-04532-5.
7
Changes in neonatal morbidity, neonatal care practices, and length of hospital stay of surviving infants born very preterm in the Netherlands in the 1980s and in the 2000s: a comparison analysis with identical characteristics definitions.20 世纪 80 年代和 2000 年代荷兰极早产儿的新生儿发病率、新生儿护理实践和存活婴儿住院时间的变化:与相同特征定义的比较分析
BMC Pediatr. 2023 Nov 4;23(1):554. doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-04354-x.
8
Impact of Technology on Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Admissions and Length of Stay: A Retrospective Study.技术对新生儿重症监护病房收治情况及住院时长的影响:一项回顾性研究
Cureus. 2023 Jun 22;15(6):e40813. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40813. eCollection 2023 Jun.
9
Length of stay and influencing factors of NICU in the Western Hunan, an underdeveloped area of China: A 9-year retrospective study.中国欠发达地区湘西州 NICU 住院时间及影响因素的 9 年回顾性研究
J Int Med Res. 2022 Jun;50(6):3000605221100753. doi: 10.1177/03000605221100753.
10
Association Between NT-proBNP and Prolonged Length of Stay in Hospital Among Preterm Infants Born at 28-31 Weeks' Gestation.28至31周胎龄早产婴儿中NT-proBNP与住院时间延长之间的关联
Front Pediatr. 2022 Jan 24;9:783900. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.783900. eCollection 2021.
欧洲极早产儿的死产和院内死亡率的差异。
Pediatrics. 2017 Apr;139(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-1990.
4
Changes in management policies for extremely preterm births and neonatal outcomes from 2003 to 2012: two population-based studies in ten European regions.2003 年至 2012 年极早产儿分娩和新生儿结局管理政策的变化:十个欧洲地区的两项基于人群的研究。
BJOG. 2017 Sep;124(10):1595-1604. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14639. Epub 2017 May 5.
5
Early Initiation of Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program (NIDCAP) Reduces Length of Stay: A Quality Improvement Project.新生儿个体化发育照护与评估项目(NIDCAP)的早期启动可缩短住院时间:一项质量改进项目。
J Pediatr Nurs. 2017 Jan-Feb;32:59-63. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2016.11.001. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
6
What factors predict length of stay in a neonatal unit: a systematic review.哪些因素可预测新生儿病房的住院时间:一项系统综述。
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 18;6(10):e010466. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010466.
7
Demonstrating the relationships of length of stay, cost and clinical outcomes in a simulated NICU.在模拟新生儿重症监护病房中展示住院时间、成本和临床结果之间的关系。
J Perinatol. 2016 Dec;36(12):1128-1131. doi: 10.1038/jp.2016.128. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
8
Use of evidence based practices to improve survival without severe morbidity for very preterm infants: results from the EPICE population based cohort.运用循证实践改善极早产儿无严重发病情况下的存活率:基于EPICE人群队列研究的结果
BMJ. 2016 Jul 5;354:i2976. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i2976.
9
Hospital-assisted home care after early discharge from a Swedish neonatal intensive care unit was safe and readmissions were rare.瑞典新生儿重症监护病房早期出院后,医院辅助的居家护理是安全的,再入院情况很少见。
Acta Paediatr. 2016 Aug;105(8):895-901. doi: 10.1111/apa.13393. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
10
Estimating Length of Stay by Patient Type in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.按患者类型估算新生儿重症监护病房的住院时间
Am J Perinatol. 2016 Jul;33(8):751-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1572433. Epub 2016 Feb 18.