University of Amsterdam, AISSR, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
J Homosex. 2020;67(1):35-57. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2018.1525944. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
The gay/lesbian social movement has primarily been understood as an identity movement. This article contributes to expanding understandings of the gay/lesbian movement by following the advocacy of the Dutch Association for the Integration of Homosexuality COC (COC) as a case of a gay/lesbian movement organization's expansion of its action repertoire to include public policy goals. On the basis of archival and interview data, this article identifies several factors that enabled the COC to see the Dutch government as a potential public policy partner. Previous legal successes and facilitation by the institutionalized wing of the women's movement, coupled with a constitutional change, resulted in the COC's development of a policy strategy. By tracing the history of the COC's strategic interactions, this article demonstrates that, while an identity strategy was constant throughout the COC's advocacy, the organization could combine an identity strategy with strategies of legal change, cultural change, and public policy.
同性恋社会运动主要被理解为一种身份运动。本文通过追随荷兰同性恋融合协会(COC)的倡导,将其作为同性恋运动组织扩大其行动剧目以纳入公共政策目标的一个案例,为拓展对同性恋运动的理解做出了贡献。基于档案和访谈数据,本文确定了使 COC 将荷兰政府视为潜在公共政策伙伴的几个因素。先前的法律成功和妇女运动制度化部门的推动,加上宪法的修改,导致 COC 制定了一项政策战略。通过追溯 COC 战略互动的历史,本文表明,虽然身份策略在 COC 的倡导中始终保持不变,但该组织可以将身份策略与法律变革策略、文化变革策略和公共政策策略相结合。