• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

玩认同政治:20 世纪 80 年代和 90 年代澳大利亚同性恋、双性恋和酷儿青年社会政策的酷儿理论反思。

Playing Recognition Politics: Queer Theoretical Reflections on Lesbian, Gay, and Queer Youth Social Policy in Australia in the 1980s and 1990s.

机构信息

School of Sociology, Research School of Social Sciences Building 22, Haydon Allen Building, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.

Vitalities Lab, Social Policy Research Centre and Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Arch Sex Behav. 2020 Oct;49(7):2341-2352. doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01751-6. Epub 2020 Jul 5.

DOI:10.1007/s10508-020-01751-6
PMID:32623541
Abstract

This article provides a queer theoretical reflection on the emergence of lesbian, gay, and queer (LGQ) youth as subjects of policy attention in Australia in the late twentieth century. In particular, it focuses on the ways in which specific forms of social, bureaucratic, and organizational recognition have given shape to LGQ youth as categorical policy objects. To this end, this article critically interrogates social policy related to the provision of funding for LGQ youth support during the 1980s and 1990s in two Australian states: New South Wales and Western Australia. More specifically, it focuses on some of the ways in which LGQ youth have been discursively shaped and materially supported in three different organizations, two of which continue to be strongly associated with support of LGQ youth in Australia. This study of the emergence of these organizations, resourced by three different sectors-the state, the church, and the LGQ community itself-necessarily draws on ephemeral resources, reflecting the conditions of possibility in which this work was being enacted. We conclude with an analysis of the necessity for situating policy recognitions within specific contexts to examine the implications for LGQ youth as the subjects such recognitions simultaneously seek to constitute and serve.

摘要

本文对同性恋、双性恋和酷儿(LGQ)青年在 20 世纪后期成为澳大利亚政策关注对象的现象进行了同性恋理论反思。具体而言,本文重点关注了特定形式的社会、官僚和组织认可如何将 LGQ 青年塑造为分类政策对象。为此,本文批判性地审视了 20 世纪 80 年代和 90 年代澳大利亚两个州(新南威尔士州和西澳大利亚州)为 LGQ 青年支持提供资金的社会政策。更具体地说,本文重点关注了在三个不同组织中,LGQ 青年在话语和物质方面的塑造和支持方式,其中两个组织在澳大利亚继续强烈支持 LGQ 青年。这项对这些组织的研究,由三个不同的部门(州、教会和 LGQ 社区本身)提供资源,必然需要利用短暂的资源,反映出这项工作得以实施的可能性条件。最后,我们分析了将政策认可置于特定背景下的必要性,以研究这种认可作为同时试图构成和服务的主体对 LGQ 青年的影响。

相似文献

1
Playing Recognition Politics: Queer Theoretical Reflections on Lesbian, Gay, and Queer Youth Social Policy in Australia in the 1980s and 1990s.玩认同政治:20 世纪 80 年代和 90 年代澳大利亚同性恋、双性恋和酷儿青年社会政策的酷儿理论反思。
Arch Sex Behav. 2020 Oct;49(7):2341-2352. doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01751-6. Epub 2020 Jul 5.
2
"It's not my business": Exploring heteronormativity in young people's discourses about lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer issues and their implications for youth health and wellbeing.“这不关我的事”:探讨年轻人在谈论女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和酷儿问题时的异性恋规范及其对青年健康和幸福的影响。
Health (London). 2019 Jan;23(1):39-57. doi: 10.1177/1363459317715776. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
3
Norms and normalisation: understanding lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer youth, suicidality and help-seeking.规范与常态化:理解女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别及酷儿青年、自杀倾向与求助行为。
Cult Health Sex. 2018 Feb;20(2):156-172. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2017.1335435. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
4
Suicidal and Help-Seeking Behaviors Among Youth in an Online Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Questioning Social Network.在线女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者、酷儿及对自身性取向存疑者社交网络中青少年的自杀及求助行为
J Homosex. 2018;65(13):1916-1933. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2017.1391552. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
5
Queer Pedagogies Out of Place and Time: Redrawing the Boundaries of Youth, Sexual and Gender Difference, and Education.不合时宜与不合地点的酷儿教学法:重新划定青年、性与性别差异及教育的边界
J Homosex. 2016;63(3):405-15. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2016.1124697.
6
Older lesbian and gay men's perceptions on lesbian and gay youth in Australia.澳大利亚老年男同性恋和女同性恋者对男同性恋和女同性恋青年的看法。
Cult Health Sex. 2021 Feb;23(2):143-158. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2019.1696984. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
7
Advocacy Beyond Identity: A Dutch Gay/Lesbian Organization's Embrace of a Public Policy Strategy.超越身份认同的倡导:荷兰同性恋组织对公共政策策略的采纳。
J Homosex. 2020;67(1):35-57. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2018.1525944. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
8
Smoking prevalence among lesbian, bisexual and queer women in Sydney remains high: Analysis of trends and correlates.悉尼女同性恋、双性恋和酷儿女性中的吸烟率仍然很高:趋势与相关因素分析。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2017 Jul;36(4):546-554. doi: 10.1111/dar.12477. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
9
Lesbian and gay youth in England.
J Homosex. 1989;17(3-4):195-223. doi: 10.1300/J082v17n03_01.
10
The process of developing a community-based research agenda with lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer youth in the Northwest Territories, Canada.在加拿大西北地区与女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和酷儿青年共同制定基于社区的研究议程的过程。
Int J Circumpolar Health. 2015 Aug 24;74:28188. doi: 10.3402/ijch.v74.28188. eCollection 2015.

本文引用的文献

1
Promoting LGBT health and wellbeing through inclusive policy development.通过制定包容性政策促进 LGBT 健康与福祉。
Int J Equity Health. 2009 May 15;8:18. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-8-18.