Lelorain Sophie, Cortot Alexis, Christophe Véronique, Pinçon Claire, Gidron Yori
University of Lille, CNRS, CHU Lille, UMR 9193-SCALab-Cognitive and Affective Sciences, F-59000 Lille, France.
University of Lille, Department of Thoracic Oncology, Albert Calmette University Hospital, F-59000 Lille, France.
J Clin Med. 2018 Oct 17;7(10):364. doi: 10.3390/jcm7100364.
This study is the first to examine the prognostic role of physician empathy in interaction with the type of consultation (TC) (TC, bad news versus follow-up consultations) in cancer patient survival. Between January 2015 and March 2016, 179 outpatients with thoracic cancer and a Karnofsky performance status ≥60 assessed their oncologist's empathy using the CARE questionnaire, which provides a general score and two sub-dimensions: listening/compassion and active/positive empathy. Survival was recorded until April 2018. Usual medical, social and psychological confounders were included in the Cox regression. The median follow-up time was 3.1 years. There was a statistical interaction between listening/compassion empathy and TC ( = 0.016) such that in bad news consultations, higher listening/compassion predicted a higher risk of death (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.13; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03⁻1.23; = 0.008). In follow-up consultations, listening/compassion did not predict survival (HR = 0.94; 95% CI: 0.85⁻1.05; = 0.30). The same results were found with the general score of empathy, but not with active/positive empathy. In bad news consultations, high patient-perceived physician compassion could worry patients by conveying the idea that there is no longer any hope, which could hasten death. Further studies are warranted to confirm these results and find out the determinants of patient perception of physician empathy.
本研究首次探讨了医生同理心在癌症患者生存中与咨询类型(TC)(TC,坏消息告知咨询与随访咨询)相互作用时的预后作用。在2015年1月至2016年3月期间,179名卡氏功能状态≥60的胸癌门诊患者使用CARE问卷评估了他们肿瘤医生的同理心,该问卷提供一个总体得分和两个子维度:倾听/同情以及积极/正向同理心。记录生存情况直至2018年4月。Cox回归纳入了常见的医学、社会和心理混杂因素。中位随访时间为3.1年。倾听/同情同理心与TC之间存在统计学交互作用(P = 0.016),即在坏消息告知咨询中,较高的倾听/同情预示着较高的死亡风险(风险比(HR)= 1.13;95%置信区间(CI):1.03⁻1.23;P = 0.008)。在随访咨询中,倾听/同情不能预测生存情况(HR = 0.94;95% CI:0.85⁻1.05;P = 0.30)。同理心总体得分也得出了相同结果,但积极/正向同理心未得出此结果。在坏消息告知咨询中,患者感知到医生的高度同情可能会通过传达不再有希望的想法使患者担忧,从而可能加速死亡。有必要进行进一步研究以证实这些结果,并找出患者对医生同理心感知的决定因素。