外周线和中央线相关血流感染的流行病学和微生物学比较。
Comparison of the epidemiology and microbiology of peripheral line- and central line-associated bloodstream infections.
机构信息
Disease Control and Prevention Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Microbiology Laboratory, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
出版信息
Am J Infect Control. 2019 Feb;47(2):208-210. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2018.08.016. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
We retrospectively studied the epidemiology and microbiology of peripheral line-associated bloodstream infection (PLABSI) in comparison with central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI). Among 2,208 bacteremia episodes, 106 (4.8%) PLABSI and 229 (10.4%) CLABSI were identified. In PLABSI, gram-negative rods, especially Enterobacteriaceae, were more frequently identified than in CLABSI, and infectious disease consultation was more frequently involved. The 7-day mortality rate was similar between the 2 groups, suggesting similar adverse effects of PLABSI and CLABSI on patient outcomes.
我们回顾性研究了外周线相关血流感染（PLABSI）与中央线相关血流感染（CLABSI）的流行病学和微生物学。在 2208 例菌血症中，发现 106 例（4.8%）PLABSI 和 229 例（10.4%）CLABSI。在 PLABSI 中，革兰氏阴性杆菌，尤其是肠杆菌科，比 CLABSI 更常被鉴定出来，而且更常涉及传染病会诊。两组的 7 天死亡率相似，表明 PLABSI 和 CLABSI 对患者结局的不良影响相似。
Zotero 插件