Department of Neurology, Sørlandet Hospital Trust, PO Box 416, 4604, Kristiansand, Norway.
Department of Neurology, Sørlandet Hospital Trust, PO Box 416, 4604, Kristiansand, Norway; The Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Tick-Borne Diseases, Sørlandet Hospital Trust, Arendal, Norway.
Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2019 Jan;10(1):156-161. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2018.09.012. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
It is heavily debated whether tick-borne infections cause chronic subjective health complaints. If the hypothesis of a major causal connection is true, one would expect to find more subjective health complaints in a population with high exposure to ticks than in a population with less exposure. In the current study we aimed to assess somatic symptoms and fatigue in a Norwegian population with high exposure to ticks, compare our findings to normative data, and assess predictors of somatic symptom load.
All individuals aged 18-69 years with residential address in Søgne municipality in southern Norway were in the period June 2015 to June 2016 invited to participate in the study. Somatic symptoms were assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15) and fatigue by the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS). A multivariable regression analysis was performed to assess predictors of somatic symptom load.
Out of 7424 invited individuals, 2971 (40.0%) returned the questionnaire. 85.1% of 2950 responders reported exposure to tick-bite. PHQ-15 mean sum score was 5.3, and 16.5% reported moderate to severe somatic symptom load (i.e. ≥ 10). FSS mean score was 3.2, and 29.8% scored above the cut-off value for fatigue (i.e. ≥ 4.0). All gender and age groups in our study population had equal or lower mean sum score on PHQ-15 than reported in Swedish normative data, and lower mean score on FSS than reported in Norwegian normative data. In multivariable regression the following factors were associated with higher somatic symptom load (listed in order of descending beta coefficient): Anxiety and depression, number of other diseases, female gender, younger age, recruitment when visiting general practitioner's office, ≤ 6 years education after primary school, tick-bite earlier in life, erythema migrans earlier in life, less physical activity, and modern health worries.
The study population reported high exposure to tick-bites, but less or equal level of somatic symptoms and less fatigue than found in normative data. There was a weak association between somatic symptom load and exposure to tick-bite and erythema migrans, possibly related to selection bias. Our findings do not support the hypothesis of a major causal connection between tick-borne infections and subjective health complaints.
关于蜱传感染是否会导致慢性主观健康问题,存在激烈的争论。如果主要因果关系的假设成立,那么在接触蜱的人群中,比在接触较少的人群中,预期会发现更多的主观健康问题。在当前的研究中,我们旨在评估挪威一个接触蜱较多的人群中的躯体症状和疲劳,并将我们的发现与规范数据进行比较,并评估躯体症状负荷的预测因素。
2015 年 6 月至 2016 年 6 月期间,邀请居住在挪威南部索格内市的所有 18-69 岁的个体参加研究。通过患者健康问卷-15(PHQ-15)评估躯体症状,通过疲劳严重程度量表(FSS)评估疲劳。进行多变量回归分析,以评估躯体症状负荷的预测因素。
在 7424 名受邀者中,有 2971 人(40.0%)返回了问卷。2950 名应答者中有 85.1%报告曾被蜱叮咬。PHQ-15 平均总分 5.3,16.5%报告有中度至重度躯体症状负荷(即≥10)。FSS 的平均得分为 3.2,29.8%的得分高于疲劳的临界值(即≥4.0)。我们研究人群中的所有性别和年龄组的 PHQ-15 平均总分均低于瑞典规范数据的报告值,FSS 的平均得分也低于挪威规范数据的报告值。多变量回归分析显示,以下因素与较高的躯体症状负荷相关(按降序排列的β系数列出):焦虑和抑郁、其他疾病数量、女性、年龄较小、在看全科医生时招募、小学后接受的教育≤6 年、年轻时被蜱叮咬、年轻时出现游走性红斑、较少的体力活动和现代健康担忧。
研究人群报告了高蜱叮咬暴露率,但躯体症状和疲劳程度低于规范数据。躯体症状负荷与蜱叮咬和游走性红斑之间存在弱关联,可能与选择偏差有关。我们的研究结果不支持蜱传感染与主观健康问题之间存在主要因果关系的假设。